DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 1091-01
22 May 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States
Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May
2001. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 85 of 21
February 2001, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish, the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
5420
Pers 85
21 Feb 01
MEMORANDUM FOR BCNR
Via: BUPERS/BCNR Coordinator
End: (1) BCNR File
1. Enclosure (1) is returned, recommending disapproval.
2. Due to the unfortunate timing of graduation from USUHS and the
April copvening of the FY-99 A tive Duty Lieutenant Commander Medical
Corps Promotion Sele tion Board the member was not eligible -before the
board. The pr motion selection board schedule was adjusted due to the
ove to Millington, TN, yet the selection board schedule is very
flexible and adjusted yearly. The member’s delay in promotion was not
considered an injustice or an error, but merely a product of timing.
Although unfortunate, this does not warrant an adjustment to the
member’s date of rank.
3. Recommend disapproval of XXXXXXX BCNR request.
BCNR Liaison, Officer Promotions
And Enlisted Advancements
Division
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07117-00
Your allegations of error and Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. as a Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve since the date of his commission and therefore was never eligible for a date of rank adjustment. e Active Status List erved continuously activ Reserve...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05153-01
You requested, in effect, that the date of rank and effective date of your promotion to lieutenant be adjusted from 1 October, 2001 to 28 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07431-00
In addition, the Board considered the Navy Personnel Command the memorandum for the record dated 5 March 2001, and the NPC opinion dated 6 March 2001 with enclosure, copies of which are attached. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the PERS-85 advisory opinion dated 6 March 2001 in finding that your date of rank should not be adjusted because you would not have rated an adjustment when you came on active duty, had you requested one. r October 1996 of rank adjustment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04838-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 85 of 8 August 2001, a copy of which is,attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04456-00
(MSC) Captain Selection Boards; special selection board Naval Reserve MSC Captain Selection Board, by which you You requested, in effect, removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 through 2003 Medical Service consideration for the FY 2000 were not considered; and amendment of the remedial memorandum now in your naval record, stating you have served on active duty continuously since your discharge from the Regular Navy on 31 January 1990, to show you are “USN” (United...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05512-00
Your request for promotion to commander was not considered, as you have not been selected to that grade by a duly constituted officer promotion selection board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The board had the official record on which to base their decisions.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08448-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Dis 21th aes was to be commissioned on 01 Jun 00, he did not meet physical qualification standards until 14 Jul 00.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07093-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Ott 1 to 98 that his fitness report for the period of Ott 31 is in error because his mid-term board on the grounds 97 counselina was not term counsel disadvantage. The member requests correction to his fitness report for the period 1 October 1997 to 3 1 October 1998.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01524-01
reques:ed removal of your failure of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session? opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 23 April attached. Enclosure (1) is returned, recommending disapproval of request to backdate his date of rank.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06189-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command, dated 22 November 2000, 15 February and 11 June 2001, and the Medical Corps Officer Community Manager dated 26 April 2001, copies of which are attached.The Board also considered your counsel’s letters dated 17 April and 18 September 2001. evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. However, this evidence, by itself, did not establish...