DEPARTMENT OF THE
’NAVY
CORRECTI& OF NAVAL RECORD
BOARD FOR
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
S
TRG
Docket No: 1104-01
10 July 2001
Dear
m
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
Correction,of Naval
A three-member panel of the Board for
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 10 July 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted
insufficient to establish the existence of probable
error or injustice.
was
material
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 30
On 26 May 1999 you requested a hardship
at age 22.
because of your wife's mental illness and attempted
17 June 1999 the discharge authority directed an honorable
discharged by reason of hardship and you were so discharged on 18
At that time you were assigned an RE-3H reenlistment
June 1999.
code.
December 1997
discharge
suicide. On
You are requesting a change in the reenlistment code because it
You
could have an impact on your future service in the Army.
contend that your wife's depression has been resolved and the
However, regulations require the
hardship no longer exists.
assignment of an RE-3H or an RE-4 reenlistment code when an
individual is discharged due to a hardship.
reenlistment code might be waived by recruiting officials if you
Since you
can demonstrate that the hardship no longer exists.
have the best reenlistment code authorized by regulations, and
have been treated no differently than others discharged by reason
of hardship, the Board could not find an error or injustice in
the assignment of the
RX-3H reenlistment code.
REI-3H
An
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08490-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06802-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TJR Docket No: 6802-02 23 April 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed. g. An RE-3H reenlistment code may be assigned...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06619-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03198-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00326-06
2 The Board consisting of Mr Mr Msreviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. This code will alert recruiters that there is a problem that must be resolved before enlistment should be authorized.The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner’s naval record so that all future...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0458 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You submitted a request for a hardship discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05964-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX ‘ WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 05964-07 15 April 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD OF %& Ref: (a) 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in her RE-4 reenlistment code. The reenlistment code of RE-4 means...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09527-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting a change in his reenlistment code.2 The Board, consisting of Mr Mr reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 29 August 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by issuing a DD Form 215...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03210-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive Your allegations of error and session, considered your application on 22 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in applicable to the proceedings of this Board. accordance’ivith administrative regulations and procedures Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10180-08
DEPARTMENT GF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN , Docket No: 10180-08 24 September 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD iia aie Ref: (a) 10 U.8.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with thig Board requesting a change in his RE-4 reenlistment code, 2. Se, and Mr —emerceviewed...