DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Y
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No: 1187-99
22 June 2000
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
Your allegations of error and
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
together with all material submitted in support
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 June 2000.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 25 August,
1 September, 21 October and 8 November 1999, copies of which are
enclosed.
The Board also considered your rebuttal to the first
two advisory opinions, which was received by the Board on 29
September 1999.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board noted that you have been returned to active duty to
earn active duty retirement.
contention that you did not waive your sanctuary zone protection
and had over 18 years of active duty has been resolved in your
favor.
Therefore, it appears that your
(MOS) are promoted, and in several recent
Concerning your request for promotion, it is clear from the
advisory opinions that very few individuals in your Military
Occupational Specialty
years, no one was promoted.
allocations for your MOS in 1994 and 1995 is unknown, but even if
there were, the promotions were apparently extremely limited.
However, HQMC has indicated that you were not eligible for
promotion in those years because you had not been recommended by
the Marine Corps Reserve Support Center.
Therefore, the Board
substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinions.
Accordingly, your application has been
Whether or not there were
c
denied.
furnished upon request.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosures
2
’
Pbl
++29- 1999 3 : 0 1
10:41
UiJ/Zti/YY
r
‘&“f
;
BN FINANCE OFF
FROM MCSF
UY
yasr
OLPARfMENt OF THE UAW
t)LRK
757
445 9471
Y--i
,
XW_ ‘*~t=~S
3280
._C’
QUANTICO. VIRGINIA
‘U,,lT’ED STATES
HARIRL ’WRPB
RUU8ELL
no*0
.-__
22134-5103
,N
REFER
To!
RCPLT
100 0
RAM-7
25
Aug YY
MEMORANDUM FOR THE
EXE;CUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR THE CORRECTION
OF NAVAL, RECORDS
Subjz
BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE
0
Ref:
(a) Honorable Jesse Helms
ltr 5730
OL&-5S of
23 March 1999
(b) CMC msg 0405412 Aug 97
CMC msg 2305432 Sep 98
(c)
(d) CMC msg 2605432
Jul 99
Per reference (a),
1.
issued orders
active duty which will qualify him for retirement.
authoriz
s been
344 days of
became eligible for promotion to
Selected Marine Corps Reserve
(SMCR) promotion board however, was not selected due to keen
1993 selection message.
competition. Reference
Reference
indicating there are no allocations for Master Sergeant.
1938 and 1999 CMC messages, each
(d) are the
(b) is the
(c) and
3.
Point of contact is
Captai
at
(703)
7e4-9133134.
H&id, Reserve Affairs
personnel Management Branch
Reserve Affairs Division
Ey direction
'q-29- 1999
O&28/99
3:02PM
10:41
FR OM MCSF BN FINANCE
HWK
3167
‘CT’lb3 6
OFF
757
Ad5 9471
,.
P. 3
qjuuu
EkhRTMENT
OFTHE NAVY
,,&j&~ftS
MAH~WER
UNITE0 STATES MARINE CORPS
DEPAR?MENf
ANO RESERVE AFFAIRS
MARRY LEE HALL; I7 LEJEUNE ROAD
QUANTICO.
VIR(;lNIA
22lM-SIM
.-'
To:
~$&fJyn
MMPR-2
1 Sep 99
MEMORANDUM
FOR
THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,
NAVAL RECORDS
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
Subj:
.
No)rcommission.ned (SNCO)
He was also considered by the 1997 and 1998
was considered for selection to
rve Staff
1.
mas
Selection Board.
selection boards. for selection to first sergeant.
selected for promotion by any of the boards who considered his
record.
in his Military Occupational Specialty
should be noted that there are no allocations for selection to master
-in his MOS for the upcoming 1999 Reserve Staff
Noncom&ssioned Officer (SNCO) Selection Board which will convene on
13 October 1999.
There were no allocations for promotions to
(MOS) of 3432
He was not
in.1998. It
m
2.
Point of contact is Mr.
Assist-ant Head, Enlisted Promotions
Promotion Branch
By direction of
the Commandant of the Marine Corps
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROA
D
PUANTICO, VIRGINIA
22134-510
3
IN
REPLY REFER TO:
1000
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,
OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF
BOARD FOR THE CORRECTION
Ref:
(a) BCNR ltr 1187-99 dtd 5
(b) Gunnery Sergeant
Ott
99
ltr undtd
In response to references (a) and
1.
once again reviewed
Unfortunately, the
response dtd 25 Aug 99.
(b)
, Reserve Affairs has
ase.
erve Affairs
As previously stated,
2 .
eligible for promotion to
was not
In order to
3 .
already authorized
days of Active Duty
reservist, he would
ta
Special Work
qualify for an active duty retirement.
so that,
-(ADSW)
although a
e Affairs has
n additional 344
4. I can be reached
at
703-784-9105/06.
Head, Reserve Affairs
Personnel Management Branch
Reserve Affairs Division
By direction
r
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
HARRY LEE HALL,
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
I7 LEJEUNE ROAD
22134-5104
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1400/3
MMPR-2
8 Nov 99
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD 'FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
ADVISORY OPINION
IN
Ref:
(a) Gunnery Sergeant
(b) CMC ltr
(c) Head,
RA ltr 1000
1400/3 MMPR-2 of
1 Sep 99
RAMA of 21
Ott 99
ltr undtd
to reference (a), recommend that
request for remedial consideration is denied.. As stated
-
he was considered for selection to first/master
Staff Noncommissioned (SNCO)
in reference (b),
sergeant by the 1997 and 1998 Reserve
Selection Board and was not selected.
Extended research of our records indicate that he was also
2 .
considered In Zone (SMCR) for first/master sergeant by the 1996
Selection Board and was not selected.
as a member of the Individual Ready Res
. An IRR Marine must be recommended by
name was
administrative1
) to be considered by a selection board.
‘"name was not listed on the
sidered for
oards.
deleted fr
romotion for the
1994 to
Selection Board due to his separation
he Special Separation Benefits Program.
Per reference (c),
3.
an additional 344 days of A
an active duty retirement.
to be considered for promotion
by the 1999 Reserve SNCO Promotion Board,
allocations for his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) of 3432.
however,
C
there are no
lify him for
s eligible
.
in MOS 3432
as been awarded
Assistant Head,
Promotion Branch
By direction of
the Commandant of the Marine Corps
Enlisted Promotions
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01685-06
In the alternative, you now request new enlisted remedial selection boards (ERSB’s) for the Calendar Year (CY) 1999, 2000 and 2001 master sergeant and first sergeant selection boards.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. The Board found the ~Th’IPR-2 advisory opinion dated 2 August 2006 was correct as to the number of Marines with whom you were compared, despite the indications, in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05425-01
Records indicate that b. Board for Correction of Naval Records for remedial consideration for promotion. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner will be given remedial consideration for paygrade E-8 for CY 98 and CY 99 by the Active promotion to Reserve Staff Noncommissioned Officer Selection Board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08059-01
He feels that since his command did not notify CMC to delay his promotion until after his name appeared on the MARADMIN for Staff Noncommissioned Officer promotions for November, he should have been promoted. Following the conviction, his commanding officer recommended revocation of his promotion to gunnery sergeant per reference (a). That same month, Subj: BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS CASE OF STAFF SERGEANT (BCNR) APPLICATION IN THE SMC Petitioner's command recommended that CMC...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04454-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06881-99
They were unable to find how, if at all, his report influenced your nonjudicial punishment or your removal from the 1998 staff sergeant selection list, nor could they find how he changed his opinions following the review of his report by the CO. We reviewed Sergeant documents concerning his Administrative Remarks page 11 entries dated 980804 and 981125, Offenses and Punishment page 12 entry dated 990311 and CMC letter 1450/3 MMPR-2 dated 2. In view of the above, it is recommended...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08183-00
Your request to change your sergeant date of rank to 9 October 1998 was not considered, as the Marine Corps Total Force System already reflects that date. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, they sa 9 his date of rank is MCRC; that MCRC set his date of rank as 1 Jan 95; and that unless BCNR rules otherwise, MMPR-2...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03401-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC: ddj Docket No: 3401-02 10 September 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07033-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Additionally, an individual cannot be promoted if he is not within the Marine Corps height and weight standards. P1400.32B, Marine Corps Promotion Manual, Volume 2, Enlisted Promotions, provides that Marines assigned RE-3P...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03326-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1400/3 MMPR-2, 12 October 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00603-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...