NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06647-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous entry due to the diagnosed personality disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06648-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06653-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 28 May 2001 you were separated from the Navy with an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06658-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2001. injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06660-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 October injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it noted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06662-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC: ddj Docket No: 6662-00 16 October 200 1 : From To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl : (1) (2) 0) DD Form 149 w/attachments Series of Documents Subject’s naval record (1) with this Board requesting, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06663-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable'to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. On 19 December 1974 you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial Prior to submitting for an unauthorized...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06664-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 October 2000. On 31 August 1999, the VA increased the rating for the gynecological condition to 3096, effective from 1 September 1996, based, in large part, on the deterioration of your condition which occurred following your release from active duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06665-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better characterization of service than the general discharge issued on 31 March 1994 and to change the reason for discharge to physical disability. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 31 March 1994 he was issued an honorable discharge by reason of erroneous enlistment vice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06665-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 November 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. and it is Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06670-01
Your military record shows that on 23 April 1971 you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for this 239 day period of unauthorized absence. requesting that original DD Form 214 issued on 2 June 1971 and the information on the SDRP 214 be corrected by removing all entries showing that you originally received an undesirable discharge. were not sufficient to warrant further recharacterization of your discharge or a confirmation of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06671-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval corrected to show promoted when first eligible. Petitioner, record be 3 The Board, consisting of Messrs Schnittman, reviewed Fetitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 November 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06684-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2001. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. A year later, on 12 April 1968, you were convicted by special court-martial (SPCM) of three periods of unauthorized absence (UA) totalling 62 days and breaking...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06686-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation reports for 16 November 1996 to 15 November 1997 and 16 November 1997 to 9 April 1998 and related material. ’s request to CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board finds the existence of an injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06687-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. In his petition, Seaman-claims that an EB was erroneously left out of his contract and requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB. Seaman s processing electronic archived record reveals no offered EB quota.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06688-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the reviewing officer’s second and third sentences from section K.4 of the fitness report for 20 May 1999 to 30 April 2000, a copy of which is in enclosure (1) at Tab A. As indicated in enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) has...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06690-01
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed that the contested fitness report for 1 August to 8 December 1991 be modified by removing all but the first sentence of the reporting senior’s comments in section C. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2001. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06690-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 May 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06691-01
The Board found the reviewing officer permissibly referred to matters outside the reporting period in question, in order to reply to issues you raised in your rebuttal to the contested fitness report. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. As an adverse fitness report, the petitioner was afforded his rightful opportunity to acknowledge and respond...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06693-01
At the outset, the board observes that Colone was the proper Reporting Senior for Report A (so acknow when the petitioner si that Lieutenant Colone Section B marks and Section C comments has absolutely no grounding in fact. Report B was completed a little over two months after the end of ased his observation PI he still had daily 2 Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF MAJOR USMC the reporting period is not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06699-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06700-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 25 February 1993 you received your fourth NJP for absence from your appointed place of duty and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06702-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06713-01
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 4 June 1997. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06714-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06716-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memorandum of 19 October 2001 (3) Subject ’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject 1. to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 January...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06717-00
6717-00 14 June 2001 Dear ‘, This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. fo:r Correction of Navy A three-member panel for the Board Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You allege that you were told the reason...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06717-01
Ihcket No: 67 17-O 1 ROBERT Recorder I). %SAI>MAN L. ADAMS (;. Acting Recorder Executive I>irect
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06723-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Continuous Submarine Pay (CONSUB) when first eligible 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pauling, Taylor, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06725-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Mimer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 September 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06726-01
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 code assigned on 28 December 1995. Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6 November 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06732-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC: ddj Docket No: 6732-01 27 November 2001 From: To: Chairmn, ti)r Secretary of the Navy hard (hrrection of Naval Records Ref: (a) Encl : (I) (2) (3) Pursuant to 1. filed enclosure corrected to show that pro\,isions the (1) with this 01‘ reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be I~oartl requesting, Pctitioncr was transferred...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06734-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting in effect, that the DD Form 214 and associated service record pages be corrected to show her current name and sex. The Statement of Service for In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. That a copy of the foregoing Statement of Service be placed in Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06735-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 September 2001. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not In this regard, the Board believed sufficient to warrant relief. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06746-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to payment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the (2), the Docket No: 6746-01 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06747-01
1552 Encl : (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments Series of Documents Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to show he is entitled to full separation pay. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Pfeiffer, and Whitener, reviewed Petitioner I and, pursuant to its regulations, allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06751-00
C. Petitioner reenlisted in the Navy on 31 August 1991 for six years as an EN3 (E-4). MAJORITY CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the majority, consisting of Messrs. Lightle and Geisler, concludes In this that Petitioner's request warrants favorable action. MINORITY CONCLUSION: The minority member, Mr. Taylor, agrees with Petitioner's request should be granted by changing his reenlistment code from RE-4 to RE-6.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06752-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the reenlistment executed on or about 30 July 1999 is for a term of 2 years, vice 4 years. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06754-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06756-99
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No: 6756-99 28 August 2000 From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy FORMER REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (9 (1) (2) 10 U.S.C. The psychiatrists noted that “[t]he patient may benefit from pharmacologic intervention; however, at present, he has declined to do ’ On 30 May 1996, the Record Review Panel (RRP) of the Physical Evaluation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06757-01
Documentary material consitleretl by the Boartl consisted of your application, together with all ~ilaterial suh~nittctl in support thereat', your niiviil record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Boartl considered the advisory I3 Noveliilw 2001. a copy of After careful and conscientioirs consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probahle material error or In this connection,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06761-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 CRS Docket No: 6761-01 10 December 2001 From: To: Subj: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary-of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: Encl: (a) 10 U.S.C. The board recommended discharge. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06762-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 6762-01 2 October 2001 : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records From To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: Em1 : (a) (1) (2) (3) Title 10 U.S.C. (I) with this Board requesting, Sul>_ject‘s widow, hereinafter referred to as in effect, that the applicable naval The Board, consisting of Messrs. 2. allegations of error and injustice on 2 October 2001 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06763-00
were so separated on 21 July 2000. assigned an RE-3P reenlistment code. The Board noted that the evidence in your Marine Corps record was sufficient to refute the conclusion of your psychologist that you are qualified to serve in the military. the evidence-f your poor adjustment in recruit training and your admission to a fraudulent enlistment were sufficient to support separation from the Marine Corps.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06764-01
[hat the applicable naval record be filed enclosure (1) with this Hoard requesting, corrected to show that the Home of Record (HOR) was shown as Cameron Park, CA 95682. in effect, 2. of record, (2), the Board finds the existence of an and especially in light of ill_justice warranting the the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner’s HOR as sho Docket No: 6764-01 b. of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06770-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TRG Docket No: 18 July 2001 6770-00 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy RECORD OF (a) Title 10 U.S.C. However, Petitioner will have to meet weight standards before reenlistment will be authorized. they cannot be used in the Accordingly, the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that a. he was not discharged on 21 February 1997...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06773-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 6773-01 26 March 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject's former spouse, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06776-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 6776-00 3 I October 2001 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Ref: Encl: (a) Title 10 IJ.S.(l. 1552 (1) DD Form 149 (2) Series of Doc~~inents (3) Subject ’s naval record w/attachmnts Pursuant to the provisions 1. filed enclosure corrected to show Enlistment (1) with this of‘ reference (a), Board requesting, Sul!iect hereinafter...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06785-00
Pursuant to the provisions of filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reenlistment in rl:ference (a), ABH3/E4 paygrade Messs. The Board, consisting of Petitioner’s allegations of error regulations, determined that the available evidence of record. (2), the ,111 the evidence of record, and especially in light of the Boarli finds the existence of an injustice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: Docket No: 4l@%@D That...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06786-01
At the time of your reenlistment, you had completed The record reflects that you were authorized the Vietnam Service Medal for service on board the USS MEREDITH (DD 890). On 8 October 1971 you requested for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial for those two periods of UA totaling about 113 days. insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of an NJP, and the fact that you accepted discharge rather than face trial by court-martial for a UA of more...