Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06660-01
Original file (06660-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT  OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JRE
Docket No: 6660-01
16 October 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 4 October 
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

2001. Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

The Board did not accept your evidence and contention to the effect that the symptoms of
anxiety which resulted in your discharge were caused by nicotine withdrawal, and that your
discharge is unjust for that reason.
In this regard, it noted that you were discharged after
seeking medical treatment for anxiety, and admitting a previously concealed history of
anxiety, for which you had taken anxiolytic medication for about three years prior to
enlisting in the Navy. The Board concluded that had you disclosed that history during the
course of your pre-enlistment processing, it is unlikely that you would have been found
qualified for enlistment. Given that history, and your inability to withstand the rigors of
recruit training, it does not appear that you are a suitable candidate for military service.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished  upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07172-01

    Original file (07172-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 December 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. That diagnosis was confirmed by a board of medical survey The Board found that you were inducted into the Marine Corps on 19 September 1950.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01332-01

    Original file (01332-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 June 2000. You denied a history of psychiatric symptoms or treatment on the front side of the form, and disclosed a history of counseling for “normal teenage rebellion” on the reverse side. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04437-01

    Original file (04437-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    discharged on 20 July 1999 by reason of erroneous entry and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. court- Thereafter, the discharge authority You were so The doctor's statement does not challenge Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to an individual separation by reason of a erroneous enlistment. situational anxiety suggests that the unique stresses of military service could easily exacerbate this problem.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09198-02

    Original file (09198-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You enlisted in the Navy on 28 June 1975. The report of an aptitude board, dated 28 July 1975, indicates that you had a history of emotional instability, and that you quit school at age 17 because you "got into trouble, had to join the Navy". The Board noted from records obtained from Departlxent of Veterans Affairs (VA) that you received psychiatric care for a period of six months at age 10.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00306-07

    Original file (00306-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you underwent a pre-enlistment physical examination on 30 November 1967, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04596-01

    Original file (04596-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2001. In this connection, the Board rejected your contentions to the effect that you suffered from post traumatic stress disorder at the time of your release from active duty in 1971, and that you were unfit by reason of physical disability at that time. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08316-08

    Original file (08316-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2009. On 16 May 1997, a medical board gave you diagnoses of incapacitating movements of the face, neck and eyes, obsessive compulsive disorder, and possible Tourette’e syndrome, and recommended that your case be referred to the Physical Evaluation Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04070-01

    Original file (04070-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 January 2002. Your personal statement and the report of the psychologist who evaluated you following your discharge were carefully evaluated, and found insufficient to warrant any corrective action in In this regard, it noted that your post-service denial of experiencing symptoms of your case. a panic disorder at any time was not accepted by the Board, as it...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07559-08

    Original file (07559-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 September 2008. In a letter dated 29 November 1999, a psychiatrist with a Louisiana State University student health center stated that you had an organic mental disorder with depression and a personality disorder, both secondary to a severe head injury you suffered as a teenager. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08740-01

    Original file (08740-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 April 2002. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.