DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JRE
Docket No: 6714-01
7 September 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 August 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you served on active duty from 1 February 1990 to 21 August 1991,
when you were discharged due to your disqualification from officer candidate training. The
discharge was based in part on your disclosure that you were suicidal, the resulting
psychiatric evaluation, and the determination that you suffered from a personality disorder.
The Board carefully considered the statement of your psychologist, but found it insufficient
to demonstrate that the diagnosis which resulted in your discharge was erroneous or unjust.
The Board would not have been inclined to delete the diagnosis from your record even if you
had demonstrated that it was erroneous, because doing so would serve to reward your for the
In this regard, the Board noted
fraudulent claim you made in order to effect your discharge.
that the diagnosis was based, in part, on your false claim of suicidal ideation, which you
made as a ploy to gain your release from the Navy. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board did not consider your request for correcting your name, as that is an
administrative matter under the cognizance of the Commander, Naval Personnel Command.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
In this
Sincerely,
.
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02732-01
You were advised of your procedural rights, The discharge The Board Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of erroneous entry. Your doctor provides no evidence of his qualifi- cations or a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation to support his The Board noted contention or to refute the Navy's diagnosis. 2 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01372-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 July 2001. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that the diagnosed made in your case and your discharge from the Marine Corps were erroneous, and that you were unfit by reason of physical disability incurred in or aggravated by your service, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06002-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the discharge authority directed an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05913-01
Your reported history suggested a You were diagnosed with an mala- self- On 25 February 1999 you received a general discharge by reason of the diagnosed personality disorder, reenlistment code. The discharge processing documentation is not and were assigned an RE-4 The Board also noted that the Navy views The Board noted the statement in support of your Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11189-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03886-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the discharge authority Thereafter, You did not You were The fact that you did not receive The Board noted your contention to the effect that you During classification interviews in recruit it is determined whether an individual is qualified for "A" school, even though you had and as a result...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00441-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 April 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03990-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board found no evidence that the diagnosis of adjustment disorder was incorrect. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01908-01
1908-01 19 July 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. contend that you became worried while in recruit training that you would not be able to pay your bills after you learned...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01863-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were so discharged on 15 May 2000 and assigned and waived the right to Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment. Since you have been treated no differently than others discharged under similar...