DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NA/AL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
ELP
Docket No. 6717-00
14 June 2001
Dear
‘,
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
fo:r Correction of Navy
A three-member panel for the Board
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 12 June 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
together with all material submitted in support
al:Legations of error and
Your
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the
error or injustice.
existenise of probable material
The record reflects that you enlisted in the Navy on 21 July 1992
for four years at age 17.
active duty and transferred to the Naval Reserve on 20 July 1996
and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment
hlonorably released from
You were
cod'a.
You allege that you were told the reason for assignment of an
RE-4 reenlistment code was due to a page 13 entry in your record
agreeing to extend or reenlist for
claim in May 1996, you received a humanitarian transfer to the
SC rather than a discharge
Naval Reserve Center in Columbia,
since your enlistment was to expire in July 1996.
orlders to the USS WASP.
You
On 27 March 2000 you were advised by letter that the microfiche
records made available for the Board's review contain little or
no evidence of your service history,
agreeing to extend or reenlist for orders, or evidence that you
received a humanitarian reassignment prior to the expiration of
such as a page 13 entry
IForm 214 that you provided
your enlistment, or a copy of the DD
You were requested to provide copies of
with your application.
the enlisted performance evaluations that are normally given to
You have not responded to that
an individual upon separation.
letter or called the staff member listed in the letter.
Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
to individuals who fail to acquire sufficient obligated service
Absent further facts surrounding
to complete a minimum tour.
your orders to the USS WASP and corroborating evidence regarding
the claimed humanitarian reassignment,
the assigned reenlistment code was
warranted.
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The
a presumption exists that
pr'oper and no change is
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02447-00
discharged on 24 February 1997 and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. 4 reenlistment code to individuals who are not recommended for reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03945-98
I do not have a (SSAN) and I have never had a (SSAN). On 5 March 1997 you submitted a request through the chain of command to extend your enlistment in accordance with the agreement.of 6 December 1996. later.- Officer-in-Charge (OIC) of the servicing personnel support detachment (PSD) which reads, in part, as follows: that the SSAN will be printed at but further states that However, on 12 March 1997 you submitted a letter to the That request was approved one day B90102d of Section A,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05311-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. clear that you had to significantly improve both your performance of duty and conduct before you could be removed from petty officer quality control and receive a better reenlistment code. performance evaluation and the NJP, were sufficient to support the improvement in your performance, The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07872-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00270
ND04-00270 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031204. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to “completion of required active service.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. Specification 5: Wrongfully possess illegal substances on 020825, to wit: approximately 5 grams of anabolic steroid material, liquid...
NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00653
ND04-00653 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040309. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record review.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02339-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the performance evaluation for the period from 16 March to 17 November 2000 states, in part, that you were not recommended for retention because you did not complete your obligated service requirements as stipulated in | — your 10 July 1997 agreement. Nevertheless, the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05563-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. During the period 16 March 1996 to 13 May 1998, you You reenlisted in the Navy on 13 April 1990 for five years and subsequently extended that enlistment on three occasions totaling 39 months. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02470-01
2470-01 17 August 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 15 August 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Further facts and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06065-02
provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a ber in the Navy, filed an application with ng that her reenlistment code be changed to . The Board excellent service, RE-4 reenlistment reenlistment due t Board believes tha reenlistment code less restrictive R recruiters that he reenlistment is au The Board further should be filed in undl reviewers will reenlistment code. Given the circumstances, the ncludes that this Report of Proceedings 'etitioner's naval record so that all future stand the...