DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
S
CRS
Docket No: 6735-01
10 September 2001
.
_
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 September 2001.
Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 12 March 1991
after more than seven years of prior active service.
The record
reflects that you were an unauthorized absentee from 13 to 16 May
On 2 June 1994 you
1994 while at sea on an aircraft carrier.
received nonjudicial punishment for an unauthorized absence of
Subsequently, on 2
about seven hours from 31 May to 1 June 1994.
August 1994 your unauthorized absence from 13 to 16 May 1994 was
charged as lost time.
discharged by reason of expiration of term of service.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
could not be an unauthorized absentee if the ship was at sea.
However, the Board concluded that these factors were not
In this regard, the Board believed
sufficient to warrant relief.
that it was possible to be an unauthorized absentee on an
aircraft carrier and for that absence to be charged as lost time.
Based on the foregoing, the Board concluded that no change to
your record is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been
On 16 December 1994 you were honorably
such as the contention that you
a
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
denied.
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9803817
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repeated misconduct,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07666-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2001. unauthorized absence of about seven days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03229-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 03817-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repeated misconduct,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09145-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 1 June 1972. On 11 October 1974 you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01873-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Further, you were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00387-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 19 February 1976. Although the request...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07430-97
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 April 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03978-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04432-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. continued your periods of unauthorized absence which resulted in the discharge being executed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...