D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E NAVY
B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S
2 N A V Y A N N E X
W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0
TRG
Docket No: 6699-01
17 April 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
16 April 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and
procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary
material considered by the Board consisted of your application,
together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval
record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In
addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by
the Chief of Naval Operations, a copy of which is enclosed.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes
of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In
this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
D E P A R T M E N T OF T H E NAVY
O F F I C E O F T H E C H I E F O F NAVAL O P E R A T I O N S
2 0 0 0 NAVY P E N T A G O N
W A S H I N G T O N . D.C. 2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0
IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO
Ser 09131 3i2US15365
15 February 2002
l~-l-onl :
7 3 ) .
Subj :
Chiei of Naval Oper dtlons (N09B13)
ih,a I r~mdn. Hoard for. Correct ion of Nava 1 14ecords
1:EC)UFST FOli COMMENTS AN,) RI-COMMENDATIONS 1 N THE CASF: OF PHMIC Tdl[PIIIYb
USNII, C
lief:
(a) RCNK ltr AEG:jdh Llocket No: 6699-01 of 31 Ilec 01
( b ) I n u.s C . 15s:
( 1 ) LWNH File
( 2 ) Service Record Medica 1 Hecor-d
As r-equested by reference ( a ) anci in dccorddnce with reference ( b ) , the c'hjef of
1
N.;' .:.! in the :i- j 1.:.;1 ;l;- a-;.-ir! .-r:. It is not one of the medals
created for sale by private vendors in commemoration of the 5oth Anniversary of World
War 11. To obtain this medal, Mr.
De'Barquement et Bataille de Normandle 4)* 944, Abbaye-dux-Dames, place Mathilde, BP 311-
should write directly to the Association
14015 Caen Cedez France. He must provide proof of his service/participation in the
Normandy campaign. From information provided by Mr.
Battle of Normandy Foundation, an estimated 40,000
there are no plans to produce more. Requests for the medals are being handled on the
first come, first service basis.
Executive Director,
als were minted and
6 . Enclosures (1) and (2) are returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07733-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. A review of his service and medical records, and the records at this Headquarters fails to reveal any documentation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07438-01
DEPARTMENT OF T H E NAVY T JR Docket No: 7483-01 24 April 2002 From : To : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD - (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the characterization of her...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04163-01
However, given the circumstances, especially his fine performance of duty, the Board concludes that an RE-1 reenlistment code should be assigned in this case as an exception to policy. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 24 July 2000 he was assigned an RE-1 reenlistment code vice the RE-4 reenlistment code now of record. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03355-99
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. However, petitioner d i ; l not initia1l.y reenlist under the STAR program, because at the ti!r!,: of r=.enlistrnent, the STS rate was not. T h i s i s a n a d v i s o r y memorandum t o r e f e r e n c e ( a ) f o r t h e u s e by t h e Board f o r C o r r e c t i o n of Naval Records ( P N R ) o n p .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08338-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A recruit performance record entry reflects that on 13 March 1998, you failed battle stations for the third time.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00017
Information was extracted from the Legal Review) LOR, LOR, LOC, 21 JAN 04 - 08 SEP 03 - 22 FEB 02 - LOR, LOR, LOR, LOC, LOC, 05 NOV 01 - 21 AUG 01 - 21 AUG 01 - 18 JUN 01 - 14 FEB 01 - Financial irresponsibility. On 5 Jan 04, an investigation revealed L11dAnn i ~&shunurabiy fdcd iv pay iis Military Star Card debt, for which he wj3 given a Lettor 6Fiiphand (LOR), dated 2 1 Jan 04, which was filed in his Personnel Information File (PIF). Direct that the respondent bo discharged from the Air...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06757-01
Documentary material consitleretl by the Boartl consisted of your application, together with all ~ilaterial suh~nittctl in support thereat', your niiviil record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Boartl considered the advisory I3 Noveliilw 2001. a copy of After careful and conscientioirs consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probahle material error or In this connection,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04637-01
In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were unfit for duty at the time of your discharge, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 0 2 M A Y 1 9 9 6 DATE MEMBER'S STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING: I UNDERSTAND THAT THE RECOMMENDED F I N D I N G OF F I T FOR DUTY I S S U B J E C T...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07754-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion" furnished by the Awards and Special Projects Branch in the Office of the Chief of Na-1 February 2002, a copy of which is attached Operations (OP09B13), dated 19 After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 I N R E P L Y R E F E R TO Ser 09B 131A2U5 1548 1 19 February...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00839-02
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 BJG Docket No: 839-02 25 February 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD - - Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. As indicated in enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) has directed the requested correction of Petitioner's...