NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03056-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Exnicios, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03057-01
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed that the contested fitness report be amended by changing the beginning date from 27 February to 13 April 1996. They found the reviewing officer had no duty to direct the reporting senior to revise or remove those of his comments which rendered the report adverse, but he correctly ensured that you were afforded your rights regarding adverse fitness reports. This includes, but is certainly not limited to, Had there been...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03062-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 3062-01 5 September 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03063-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2001. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03064-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the by the Board consisted of your proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03066-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that when Petitioner entered active duty he was given a thirty-six (36) month Active Duty Service Obligation (ADSO). Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03068-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. discharge authority directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct, and on 23 July 1981 you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03069-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Exnicios, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03070-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. discrepancy between the ranking (of "Must Promote") and the written portion of the which states, "Lieutenant Commander as my strongest possible recommendation for early ) there does appear to be some In addition, there...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03072-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Taylor, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 1 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03078-01
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence probable material error or In this regard, it is important iriSjustice. The following is provided in response to reference (a): Recommend the Board deny ENS 'request to enroll t:e Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). closure of VEAP was given the widest dissemination via NAVOP messages, Leave and Earnings Statements of all active duty members...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03081-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he signed his Officer Appointment Acceptance and Oath of Office for an appointment into the Naval Reserves on the date following his release from active duty. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2001 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03083-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive Your allegations of error and injustice session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 815 of 26 June is attached. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use recommend the petitioner's record In view of the above, only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03084-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. the record does not reflect what, if any, disciplinary action taken for this offense. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03086-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N DC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 LCC:e!Cb Docket No: 3086-01 25 April 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy - Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD - Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03093-01
3093-01 15 October 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 11 October 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The fact...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03094-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 3094-01 24 July 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment. The Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03102-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Neuschafer, and Ms. Davies, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03103-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in of college credit hours. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 17 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. and especially in light...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03104-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, effec:, that the applicable naval record be filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03117-01
Petitioner's claim that his NJP of 28 April 1987 should be expunged because he was subsequently tried by SPCM for the same offense is without merit. Petitioner's disobedience constituted a d. Petitioner's claim that his SPCM conviction should be Petitioner's Petitioner erroneously Neither his NJP on 28 April With respect to the NJP of 28 April 1987, expunged because it is the result of his refusing the punishment of an unjust NJP is without merit. Accordingly, we recommend that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03119-01
1 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: SE OF STAFF SERGEAN Staff Sergeant 1. has been reviewed concerning his request for removal of the Administrative Remarks (1070) NAVMC 000714 and CMC letter of selection from the 2000 Gunnery Sergeant Selection Board, from his service records. 118(11) page 11 entry dated 1450/5 MMPR-2 dated 22 Aug 2000, revocation application with supporting documents MC0 authorizes commanders to make entries on page...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03126-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to per diem and Temporary Additional Duty (TAD) benefits for a period of TAD in excess of 180 days. d. The special orders dated 24 April 2001 issued by the 4th Marine Division, Twin Cities, MN which reassigned Petitioner to Okinawa, Japan were revoked immediately...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03130-01
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed amendment of the contested fitness report by changing the entry in item 17b (whether the Marine has been the subject of an adverse report from outside the reporting chain) from “Yes” to “No.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2001. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03131-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 26 September 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge, given your record of two conviction in 22 months of service. factor that you waived an ADB, the one opportunity you had to show why you should be retained or discharged under honorable conditions.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03136-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board show that he was assigned a reenlistment (RE) code received on 19 May 2000. retquesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to more favorable than the RE-4 he 2. That Petitioner ’s naval recolrd be corrected to show that on 19 May 2000, he was discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment, and assigned a reenlistment code of RE-3P in lieu of the code of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03138-01
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed amendment of the contested fitness report to reflect you were the subject of a meritorious mast. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 18 April 2001, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03139-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be “B” Selective Reenlistment corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for the AG rating (NEC 74 12). The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Exnicios, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03140-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 18 April 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03142-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 December 2001. With regard to the ear condition which resulted in your administrative separation from the Navy, the Board noted that you accepted the findings of a medical board which evaluated you on 16 September 1968, and determined that you suffered from chronic, bilateral otitis media, with perforation of the left tympanic membrane, which existed prior to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03143-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03145-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 13 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03147-00
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary -_- From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Naval Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show an honorable discharge vice the good discharge issued on 3 December 1943. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, regulations and policies. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03156-01
You also made new requests to remove your relief for cause from recruiting duty, which was requested on 5 April 1999; your nonjudicial punishment of 29 March 1999; and your service record page 11 counseling entries dated 17 and 24 February 1999. We are asked to provide an advisory opinion on Petitioner's request for the removal from his Service Record Book (SRB) and his official military personnel file (OMPF) of all references to his nonjudicial punishment (NJP) of 29 March 1999 and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03163-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) released on 10 Reference (c) released on 02 d. The petitioner requests to backdated the 15 February 2001 to 13 January 2001 and receive the zone "B" SRB...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03165-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 June 2001. Although you were diagnosed a suffering from several mental disorder at that time, the only condition considered disabling was a psychotic disorder, not otherwise specified, which the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) determined existed prior to service (EPTS), and was not service aggravated. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03167-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03168-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. to the Navy from civilian confinement on 27 September 1960. authority directed an undesirable discharge and you were so discharged on 31 October 1960.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03180-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in of college credit hours. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Neuschafer, Frankfurt, and Ms. Davis, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 May 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03181-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 8 January 1984. However, the Board is aware that Headquarters Marine Corps has routinely recommended corrective action in similar cases when an individual is qualified for reserve retirement and there is no explanation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03182-01
On 2 November 1979 the Naval Discharge Review Board denied your request for an upgrade of your discharge. The Board concluded that the foregoing factors were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the fact that you accepted discharge rather than face trial by court- martial. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03184-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,' sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, you went UA before this corrective action could be implemented, and remained UA for nearly four years. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03186-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 200 1 reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNP...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03187-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the original fitness report for 1 February to 14 August 1998, a copy of which is at Tab A, and filing in its place the supplemental report for the same period dated 14 August 1998, a copy of which is with Petitioner’s application at enclosure (1). ’s ’s record and d. That any material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03191-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JRE Docket No: 3191-01 3 July 2001 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy ’ Subj: Ref: Encl: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD GO (1) (2) (3) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03193-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that naval record be corrected to show that he was discharged by reason of physical disability, vice unsatisfactory performance. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Adams, Goldsmith and Schultz, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 May 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03198-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2001. demonstrated that you were unfit for duty on 30 January 1976, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03199-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, Board requesting, in effect, to show that he was transferred to the Fleet Reserve under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) vice being discharged on 22 January 2001. that his naval record be corrected filed enclosure (1) with this 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Kastner, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03200-01
factors are present in this case. Department to cite Petitioner with breach of peace does not limit the Marine Corps' Additionally, both offenses alleged. Jurisdiction under Article 2 is not e. Petitioner's claim that his NJP was unjust because he had already paid a fine for the civilian offense is without merit.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03201-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Taylor, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...