DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JRE
Docket No: 3142-01
28 December 2001
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 6 December 2001. After careful consideration of
your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it
would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a
timely manner. The Board noted that you became aware of the alleged error or injustice in
your record in 1968. The fact that you were unable to contact members of your former
platoon until recently was considered insufficient to warrant the waiver of the statute of
limitations in your case.
The Board was unable to conclude that you were unfit for service by reason of a physical
disability which was incurred in or aggravated by your brief period of naval service.
In this
regard, it noted that the available records do not demonstrate that you suffered from post
traumatic stress disorder or other significant mental disorder prior to your discharge, or that
you were unfit for duty because of a testicular injury. With regard to the ear condition
which resulted in your administrative separation from the Navy, the Board noted that you
accepted the findings of a medical board which evaluated you on 16 September 1968, and
determined that you suffered from chronic, bilateral otitis media, with perforation of the left
tympanic membrane, which existed prior to your enlistment, and was not aggravated by your
naval service.
board, and you requested that you be administratively discharged from the Naval service as
soon as possible.
In addition, you waived your right to appear before a physical evaluation
You may request reconsideration of this decision.
discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted
your application. The evidence may pertain to the timeliness of your application or to its
merits. Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application is not possible.
It is regretted that a more favorable reply cannot be made.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03165-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 June 2001. Although you were diagnosed a suffering from several mental disorder at that time, the only condition considered disabling was a psychotic disorder, not otherwise specified, which the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) determined existed prior to service (EPTS), and was not service aggravated. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05283-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, -when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 00759-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07101-00
The diagnosis of Delusional Disorder, Paranoid Type, was thus established at this evaluation. The petitioner's psychological evaluations consistently reported that no delusions were present. However, this does not SUBJ: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN CASE OF mean the condition was also present at the time they were diagnosed solely as Personality Disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02938-00
The Board concluded that even it were to be assumed, for the sake of argument, that you did suffer from schizophrenia during your enlistment, you would not be entitled to disability benefits administered by the Department of the Navy, because that condition was quiescent at the time of your release from active duty. You have not demonstrated that you were unfit for duty on 7 November 1958. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00101-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03333-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05066-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, it is Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00216-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2001. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, limited portions of your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board was not persuaded that you suffered from post traumatic stress disorder in 1945 that you were unfit for duty in 1950 because of a disability which was incurred...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 09388-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 2 July 2001. You were discharged by reason of a...