Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03165-01
Original file (03165-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

JRE
Docket No: 3165-01
3 July 2001

 

Dearéiplili,

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 21 June 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, it considered the comments of your
counsel.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the

evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

The Board found that you underwent a pre-enlistment physical examination on 28 May 1999.
You did not disclose any significant medical history in the Standard Form 93, Report of
Medical History, you completed on that date. You specifically denied a history of suicide
attempt, alcohol abuse, depression or excessive worry, and nervous trouble of any sort. You
enlisted on 22 June 1999. It appears that your enlistment was fraudulent, because after you
enlisted you disclosed significant evidence of pre-service psychopathology, such as an
attempted suicide at age 12; abuse of alcohol beginning at age 14; and auditory
hallucinations beginning at age 17. You were discharged by reason of physical disability on
15 January 2001, without entitlement to disability benefits administered by the Department of
the Navy. Although you were diagnosed a suffering from several mental disorder at that
time, the only condition considered disabling was a psychotic disorder, not otherwise
specified, which the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) determined existed prior to service
(EPTS), and was not service aggravated. You apparently agreed with that determination, as
you accepted the findings of the PEB.
The fact that you were found fit for enlistment, that you did not seek treatment for a mental
disorder for almost seven months after you enlisted, and that you suffered from mental
disorders other than the psychotic disorder were not considered probative of the existence of
error or injustice in your record. The Board noted that psychiatric diagnoses are generally
based on information disclosed by the person being evaluated. With the possible exception
of those cases where a florid psychosis is present, it is very unlikely that a physician
conducting a pre-enlistment physical examination will diagnose a significant psychiatric
disorder when the person being evaluated denies a history of psychiatric symptoms. Had you
disclosed your pre-service history of suicide attempt, alcohol abuse, and auditory
hallucinations, you would have been referred for psychiatric evaluation, and most likely been
disqualified from enlisting. As you have not proved that your psychotic disorder was
improperly classified as EPTS, that it was aggravated beyond natural progression during your
enlistment, or that you suffered from another condition which rendered you unfit for duty,
and was incurred in or aggravated by your brief period of military service, the Board was
unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Accordingly, your application has

been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the

burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00529

    Original file (PD2010-00529.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the seven months since the previous C&P exam, the CI had been hospitalized once for command hallucinations and suicidal ideation. Subsequent VA records indicate the CI was hospitalized at least four more times in 2006-2008 with hallucinations and suicidal ideation, with GAFs ranging from 20 to 58. The Board determined, therefore, that none of the stated conditions were subject to Service disability rating.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01732-02

    Original file (01732-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, and the record of the two previous reviews of your application by the Board. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by the Director, Naval Council of Personnel Boards dated 1 May 2002, a copy of which is attached. An SNMHAS record entry dated 12 August 1987 indicates...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01338

    Original file (PD-2013-01338.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On admission the CI reported worsening depression and anxiety symptoms, auditory hallucinations of people calling her name and anger episodes involving hurting herself, though she denied SI or homicidal ideation (HI). BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00117

    Original file (PD2010-00117.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Mental Condition/Major Depressive Disorder/Anxiety Disorder. The Board noted the recommendation made by the AFBCMR medical consultant for the contributions of the pre-existing component of her condition, the presence of the paranoid personality disorder and the examiners implication that the CI failed to disclose her psychiatric issues prior to enlistment; however, there was no evidence whatsoever in the record that the CI ever received medical treatment for a psychiatric condition prior to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01301

    Original file (ND02-01301.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01301 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20020911, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. As the representative, we ask that consideration be given to equitable relief, as this is a matter that involves a determination whether a discharge should be changed under the equity standards, to include any issue upon which the applicant submits to the Board’s discretionary authority,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04334-01

    Original file (04334-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board your After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) made preliminary findings that you were unfit for duty because of post traumatic stress disorder and major depression, which existed prior to your enlistment, and were not aggravated by your service. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01572

    Original file (PD2012 01572.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The examiner further opined that the CI had severe military and civilian impairment and that without therapy or medication, the probability for his continued mental deterioration was “extremely high” and that even with ongoing treatment theprognosis was “still guarded.” He also stated the CI’s mental illness was severe, chronic, and unfitting and he highly recommended the CI initiate psychotherapy and medication at the VA.The C&P examination approximately 4 monthsafter permanent separation...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2006-055

    Original file (2006-055.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon the applicant’s discharge from the hospital on July 30, 2002, Dr. N, a psy- chiatrist, diagnosed him with an Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood, as well as a Personality Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, but with Cluster B Traits.3 Dr. N reported that the applicant had no mental disease, defect, or derangement and was “capable of distinguishing right from wrong and adhering to the right. Upon admission to the hospital on July 24, 2002, a psychologist interviewed the applicant and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00880

    Original file (PD2010-00880.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    VA psychiatric outpatient notes proximate to separation indicate the CI’s condition deteriorated significantly at that time, and he was diagnosed with PTSD in addition to bipolar disorder four days prior to separation. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows: TDRL at 50% for six months following CI’s prior medical separation (minimum of 50% IAW §4.129) and then a permanent 50% disability retirement as below. Absent the requirement for...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00415

    Original file (PD2010-00415.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The medical bases for separation were posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) associated with panic disorder and social phobia, both designated as EPTS (existed prior to service) and alcohol abuse. However, clear evidence within the VA clinic notes and the 15-month examination that covered the CI’s condition within the six-month TDRL timeframe had to be considered. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.