S

HD:hd
Docket No: 03187-01
17 August 2001

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OFNAVAL RECORD

 
2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

L
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

u s

(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

(1) DD Form 149 dtd 19 Apr 01 w/attachments
(2) PERS-3 11 memo dtd 9 Aug 01
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the original fitness report for 1 February to 14 August 1998, a copy
of which is at Tab A, and filing in its place the supplemental report for the same period
dated 14 August 1998, a copy of which is with Petitioner’s application at enclosure (1).

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Schultz and Zsalman and Ms. Moidel, reviewed
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 August 2001, and pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

In correspondence attached as enclosure 

(2), the Navy Personnel Command office
having cognizance over fitness report matters has commented to the effect that Petitioner’s
request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
contents of enclosure 
following corrective action.

(2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by removing therefrom the following

original fitness report:

Date of Report

Reporting Senior

98Sep23

Period of Report
From
To

98FebOl

98Aug14

b. That the supplemental fitness report dated 14 August 1998, to be forwarded by this
Board, be filed in place of the original report for the same period to be removed pursuant to
recommendation a above.

c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board

recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner
that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.

’s

’s record and

d. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner

’s naval record be returned

to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of
Petitioner ’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board ’s review  ‘and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

JONATHAN S. 
Acting Recorder

RUSKIN

2

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

m W. DEAN PFEIFFER

Executive Director

3

nd under

C

roviding mentorship, instruction and s

INSTRUCTOR

29. 

Primaly/collataal/Watl%tanding  duties. (Enter primary duty abbreviation in box.)

ASSTPNS

Assistant Professor of Naval Science-7, PAO-7, Management

I
Control/Command Evaluation Officer-7, Sailing Officer-7, Medical Officer-7, Surface
Warfare Advisor-7,
and advising all 2nd and 3rd class midshipmen in Navigation and Shipboard Operations.
For 
Mid-tam  
entcr3Omd31  
PERFORMANCETRAITS:
standards, 4.0 

Rifle Team Coach-7, AISSO-7.

l.O-Belowstandards!notprogreasingor  
 

2.0-Doer  
standards for 5.0. 

- Exceeds most 3.0 standards, 5.0 

- 
Meeta  overall criteria and most 

Standards are not all inclusive.

NOT REQ

UNSATinany  

onestandard;  

hmccxmselirrg~  

C-ting  Use. (When 

colnpleting  
sign32.)

ofthe specific 

Chmselcd

Colmseloi

Sim  

30. Date 

FlTREP,

32. 

31. 

Primary duties consist of instructing

ofhiivi~  

Counseled

notyetmeetalI3.0standards;3.0-MeetsaU  3.0

1.0,
Standards

Below 

-Lacks  basic professional knowledge
to 
Caunot apply basic skills.
- 

effectivelY.

paform 

-Fails to develop 
achieve timely 

prof~ionally  or
quali&atious.

2.0
Fm-

pressin&

-

3.0

Me&  Standards

4.0

Abovt
standard!

5.P

CblilyExotedsSt.5ll~

bowledge.

prof~sional  

thomu&  

-Has 
-= &?=a both 
-Steadily improves skills, achieves
timely 

qual~cations.

mutiue

ditlkult problems.

-Recqqixd  expert, sought after to
solve 
-Exceptionally skilled, develops and
executes 
-Achieves early/highly 
qualitications.

innovative ideas.

advanced

c0 

c

c

zi &y bias or 
- 

engages

-Tolaxtesbii&aimessor
harassmentinmboKlkW
-LacksmspectforEOobje&ves.  

-Inte+es~orderauddiscipline  
by~rightsofothers.

cl 

 

. .
. .cafflstentlYmJ=talJ!===.
 
uuaWkWydemeanorfconduct.
~Unabletomeetoneormore
ph+calmadinexstandards  
-Fai.lstoiiveuptooneomore  
Navy Core Values: HONOR,
COURAGE, COMMITMENT.

-

-

-

-
-

-
-

fairness

-Always treats others with 
and respect
-Doesnotcomionebiasorharassment
in or outside of workplace.
-Supports Navy EO objectives.

-Contributestounitc&siveness
and morale.

c

r

c

-Admired  for fairness and human
-~aciimateoffaimessand
rekpect 
-Pr+active  
concrete EO objectives.
-L.eaderaudmodelcontributoftounit
cohesiveuess  and morale.

EQ leader, achieves

for human  

WOIth.

witfi  

-Excelleutpemonal~.
-Excekntdemeanororcu~&uct.
-complies  
plvgmu&withinallsta&rds.
-AlwaYs lives up to Navy Core
Values: 
HONOl&COURAGE,
COMMITMENT.

physical  

readiness

I

133.
PROPBSSIONAL,
EWERTISE:
Professional
pficieocy,and
qualiications.

NOB 

1

NOB 

[z

CHARACTER

cI 

~Createaam5ict_mkllingtowork  
withathers,plltsselfllbovekUlL
~Failstoumkataudteamgoalsor  
teamworktechniquai.
Doesnottakedirectionswell.  

-

-

-

-Lacks 

kdtiative.

.Unable  to plan or prioritize.

~Doesllatm&tailllWJdiIleas.

~Failstogetthejobdone.

AC

&ION  
COMPLISHMENT
ANDINITIATIW
Taking 

initiative,

Imission,

NAVPWS  

NOB 
161M  

c
(7%)

cl 

c

-Takeainit&ivetomeetgc&.

-

q 

-Pkals @ iW 
-

. .

Mamtamshighstateofreadincss.

efktively.

-AlwaYsgetsthejobdone.

c

2

-E=@=Y  
VP-==.
-Exemplary representative 
-Aleaderiuphysicalmadmass.

personal

 

ofNavy.

-Exemplifies Navy Core 
COURAGE.
HONOR, 
CO -.

Valuea:

imp&es 

cooperation

-Team  builder, 
audprogress
-Talented 
technique.5 for 
.Th&bestestatleptiIlgandoffkriug

meator, focuses goals and

team_

c

c

waYs  to

inuovative 

-Develops 
accomplishmissioa
-Pla&prioritkawithexceptioual
skillandfoKsight.
-h+int+ssupuiareadiacaqeven

-~,~~fald~
bett @hcltpeded

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

NAVY 

PERSONNEL  
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

CoMMAND

MILLINGTON TN  

38055-0000

Y

1610
PERS-3 11
9 August 2001

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Via: 

PERSBCNR Coordinator (PERS-OOZCB)

Subj 

:

Ref: (a) BUPERSINST 16 10.10 EVAL Manual

_

Encl: (1) BCNR File

1. Enclosure (1) is returned. The member request the removal of his fitness report for the period
1 February 1998 to 14 August 1998 and replace it with a supplemental report for the same
period.

2. Based on our review of the material provided, we find the following:

a. A review of the member

’s headquarters record revealed the report in question to be on file.

It is not signed by the member; however, block-46 is annotated with 

“Certified Copy Provided

”.

b. The report in question is a Detachment of Individual/Regular report. The member alleges

the report was incorrectly submitted through administrative error.

c. Upon further review of the member

’s headquarters record it revealed the fitness report for

the period 22 August 1997 to 3 1 January 1998 to be identical to the report in question except for
the period of the report, blocks- 14  and 15  and block-42 his promotion recommendation.

d. The reporting senior submitted a supplemental fitness report dated 14 August 1998 with
the required cover letter dated 30 March 2001. The reporting senior stated the reason for
submitting the supplemental report was the original report was submitted through administrative
error. The member
on both reports. The member signed the supplemental report acknowledging the contents of the
report and his right to submit a statement. The member did not desire to submit a statement.

’s performance trait marks and his promotion recommendation are the same

e. Although the supplemental report was submitted beyond the two-year time limit, it is
apparent an administrative error occurred in the preparation and submission of the original
report.

f. The member proves the report to be unjust or in error.

3. We recommend removal of the fitness report in the member ’s record and replace it with a
copy provided with the member ’s petition.

Performance
Evaluation Branch