NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02581-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC memorandum attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02595-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 June 2001. 1034 you may request the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) consider an application for correction of your military records. 3 a 1 September 1999. timely review of this case is requested.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02600-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02616-00
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Since you have been treated no differently than others discharged for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02621-00
Y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BJG Docket No: 2621-00 27 June 2fKKl From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: Encl: : USMCR (RET (a) Title 10 U.S.C. the Marine Corps Reserve There is no indication July-l b. Petitioner retired from the IRR effective 1 January 2000. this Headquarters informally opined' that In March 2000, Petitioner was promoted to colonel effective 1 July...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02632-00
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ensley, Schultz, and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner ’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 August 2000, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. C. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC Promotion Branch (MMPR) has advised that had Petitioner been selected by the FY 2000 Captain Selection Board, he would have been assigned a date of rank and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02641-00
The following comments concerning the page 11 entry dated 960112 4. are provided: a. The following comments concerning the page 11 entry dated 980326 5. are provided:' a. he was he statement would be filed acknowledged the counseling " to" make a statement in Again, it is noted that a copy of the rebuttal statement Sergean furthe b. Sergean does not provide documented evidence to support his claim that the page 11 entry is in error or unjust.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02643-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 2ooO. You The Board was not persuaded that you were unfit by reason of physical disability at the time of your discharge from the Marine Corps. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02646-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02649-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 June 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02664-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02666-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations opinion furnished by the Navy 2oo0, a copy of which is Personnel Command dated 19 June attached. ” c. The reporting senior has submitted, and we have accepted and filed the supplemental report. The fact that the revision is a better report should have no bearing on whether the original is retained or removed: W e make provisions for the submission of supplementary material concerning fitness reports so that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02672-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 June 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02675-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Subsistence (BAS)-COMMRATS. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Chapman, and Ms. Schnittman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 May regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02681-01
On 22 April 1984 you received a second NJP for use of marijuana. Board concluded that these factors and contentions were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of two you were well aware of the Navy's drug policy and the adverse consequences that would result if you violated that policy. Board also noted the aggravating factor that you waived the right to present your case to an ADB, show why you should be retained or discharged under honorable conditions.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02684-01
2684-01 21 August 2001 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that the reason for discharge and his reenlistment code be changed. Thereafter, the discharge authority directed that Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02685-01
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. no differently than others discharged under similar circum- stances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02687-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. AC) uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what IAW reference leave is charged when a member takes leave.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02689-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone MA rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02692-01
~ 3 / 19 June 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy S 110; : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject liereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure ( 1 ) with this Board requesting, in eflkct, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the reenlistment of 4 December 2000 is in the rate1gr:ide of AME3lE4. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McF'artlin, Milner,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02695-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. bv the Board for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02697-01
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former warrant officer in the Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 1 January 2001 but he requests removal of a failure of selection to CW04 and missed pay and/or retirement points from 19 December 2000 to the present. The advisory opinion points out that if the corrected request...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02698-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 2698-01 8 May 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy End: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Series of Documents (3) Subject’s naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02700-99
You request, in effect, that you record be corrected to show that you were discharged by reason of physical disability because of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02706-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the Docket No: 2706-01 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that the enlistment of 10 October 2000 is in paygrade E2. Correction of Naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02707-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Zsalman, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 April 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02708-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Zsalman, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 April 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02709-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory 334/06368 of 18 June 2001, a After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference Members who b. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02710-01
--- -/ L .- J .- c-_ _- 7-2 > ‘-II .- _ -7 RECOMh4EtiDATION: I>ocket No: 2710-01 Pursumt to Section 4. Records present at record of Code 6(c) Fukral (32 the Board ’s review the Board ’s proceedings in 1~isc0 ot‘ licguldioll~, mtl the tlic of’ Ih)itrtl for Correction of Naval certii ‘ietl that quorum was foregoing is a true and complete l~~uct~l~~~-tzs Suction 723.6(c)) it is IIW 01‘ clclilm-;~tions, ~~ritl that drove entitled the m;~ttt ’r. ROBERT Recode1 I).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02712-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 PERS-604 dated 4 June 2001, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02717-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 July 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02721-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found the incident cited, described by your service record page 11 counseling entry, the reporting senior and the third sighting officer as “minor,” was nevertheless important enough to warrant mention in the contested fitness report. Reference fitness report for the period 971101...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02722-01
Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code because of your misconduct, and since you were not recommended for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02723-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 Lf’:dci_j .I I)ocket No: 2723-O 1 Novenltm 200 1 20 Ref: (a) Title IO I1.S.C:. IS52 the RECOMMENDATION : JIocket No: 2723-01 That Petitioner ’s naval record the Delayed Entry rating, Program 042 MSG BIJf’EKS Ix co~mmctl, (l>lZl’) IOc)% \\81icre appropriate, provisirm rhe anwun . Pursuant to Section 6(c) Records (32 Code of Federal present at the Board ’s review record of the Board ’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02724-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. petitioner furnishes a letter from Master Gunnery Sergeant a copy of the challenged fitness report, and his own...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02727-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-5. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Exnicios, and Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02730-01
the minimum standards for enlistment due to your mental condition, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. The Board thus concluded that the Since you do not meet In this regard, the Board noted Regulations authorize You are advised that personal granted by the Board and only determines that a case cannot individual's presence, or the some useful purpose. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02732-01
You were advised of your procedural rights, The discharge The Board Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of erroneous entry. Your doctor provides no evidence of his qualifi- cations or a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation to support his The Board noted contention or to refute the Navy's diagnosis. 2 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02737-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he was assigned an earlier date of rank when he enlisted on 23 July 1999. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Chapman, and Ms. Schnittman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 May 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02737-01
filed enclosure ( 1 ) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of major he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 Major Selection Board, vice the FY 2002 Major Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Adams and Harrison and Ms. Moidel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 31 May...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02740-01
2740-01 24 August 2001 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF #.&,a Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the discharge under other than honorable conditions and RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02742-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board 29 March 2001, a copy of which is attached. In its proceedings, the PERB concluded that the error was in 3. the "from" dates on the petitioner's fitness reports for the periods...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02747-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ,Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of application on 13 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Given the circumstances of your case, the Board concluded your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02752-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 2000.. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02756-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 4050.1K LFT-3-WC of 21 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. A service member cannot plan the shipment of personal property based on future promotions, nor can a change or cancellation of an assignment be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02762-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 November 2001. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge totalled nearly a due to the fact that your unauthorized absences year. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02764-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 CRS Docket No: 2764-01 15 January 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Subj: Secretary of the Navy OF2 ECORD .-, (a) 10 U.S.C. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants partial In this regard it is clear that Petitioner was not relief. That any material or entries inconsistent...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02768-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Lightle, and allegations of error and injustice on 17 July that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02773-01
The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner ’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action, CONCLUSION Upon review and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02775-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Goldsmith, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 April 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...