Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02685-01
Original file (02685-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

ELP
Docket No. 2685-01
17 August 2001

Dear'

This is in reference to your
naval record pursuant to the
States Code, Section 1552.

application for correction of your
provisions of Title 10, United

considered your application on
Your allegations of error and injustice were

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records,
sitting in executive session,
15 August 2001.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and
procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 26 July
1995 for eight years at age 18.
You were ordered to active duty
for four years on 22 January 1996.

The medical record reflects that on 24 January 1996 you disclosed
behavior problems, alcohol abuse,
April 1994 to May 1995.
failed to advise recruiting personnel about any of the foregoing.
You also stated that you had been treated prior to enlistment for
substance abuse and dependence.
diagnosed you as alcohol dependent.

Thereafter, a medical officer

and psychiatric counseling from

The record also indicates that you

On 27 January 1996 you were notified of administrative separation
action that could result in your release from the custody and
control of the Armed Forces by reason of defective enlistment
due to erroneous entry as evidenced by the diagnosed alcohol
dependence.
to consult with legal counsel or submit a statement in your own

You were advised of your procedural rights, declined

behalf, and waived the right to have your case reviewed by the
general court-martial convening authority.
discharge directed that your enlistment be voided.
1996 you were separated by reason of
abuse" and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.

"erroneous entry-alcohol

Thereafter, the

On 5 February

Federal law requires that an enlistment be voided if an
individual is determined to be drug or alcohol dependent within
72 hours of reporting for an initial period of active duty.
Regulations also require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment
code to individuals separated by reason of "erroneous  
entry-
Your contention that an officer told you in
alcohol abuse."
recruit training that you could come back in after a year is
neither supported by the evidence of record nor by any evidence
submitted in support of your application.
no differently than others discharged under similar circum-
stances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your
assigned reenlistment code.
reenlistment code was proper and no change is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The Board thus concluded that the

Since you were treated

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06707-97

    Original file (06707-97.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 12 January 1996. Such a code is required under these An RE-4 reenlistment code is Absent a Accordingly, In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. That Petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08432-01

    Original file (08432-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. Petitioner was then advised that administrative separation action was being initiated by reasons of erroneous enlistment as evidenced by the diagnosis of alcohol dependence. Additionally, the applicable regulation requires the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of "erroneous entry-alcohol abuse. " That Petitioner's naval record be corrected'by issuing him a new DD Form 214 which reflects that he served on active duty from 8 February to 8 March...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02684-01

    Original file (02684-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2684-01 21 August 2001 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that the reason for discharge and his reenlistment code be changed. Thereafter, the discharge authority directed that Petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03411-01

    Original file (03411-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Therefore, the Board Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated by reason of erroneous enlistment, and such a code is normally assigned when the underlying reason...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03437-01

    Original file (03437-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The psychiatrist anti- On 24 September 1996 you were notified of separation processing by reason of personality disorder, fraudulent enlistment, erroneous enlistment and alcohol rehabilitation failure. that you would be an outstanding member of the military and recommended that your record...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04858-09

    Original file (04858-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2010. As a result of this action, you failed the alcohol abuse rehabilitation program. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01087-01

    Original file (01087-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in considered your application on Documentary regulations and policies. You were so discharged on 27 November 1995 and assigned and waived the right to Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of erroneous...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02119-01

    Original file (02119-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. than others separated for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06556-00

    Original file (06556-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 February 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Based on this evaluation, you were processed for an administrative separation.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02243-08

    Original file (02243-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Given your diagnoses that resulted in discharge after about three months of active service and since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the entry level separation or assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. ...