DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TJR
Docket No: 2722-01
26 July 2001
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
Your allegations of error and
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 17 July 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
Board was unable to obtain your complete service record and
conducted its review based on your partial service record,
information extracted from your unit diary book, and the
documentation submitted with your application.
The
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 4 November
1986 at the age of 18.
entries
13 September 1991 you received nonjudicial punishment
record does not, however,
received these
(NJP).
indicate the offenses for which you
(UDE) which indicate that on 3 October 1990 and again on
Your record contains two unit diary
NJPs.
The
Your record reflects that on 5 November 1992 you were convicted
by special court-martial (SPCM) of disrespect and were sentenced
to reduction to
1992, you were honorably released from active duty and
transferred to the Marine Corps Reserve.
not recommended for reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4
reenlistment code.
obligation, you were issued an honorable discharge certificate.
At the expiration of your military
Shortly thereafter, on 13 November
paygrade E-3.
At that time you were
Your record also contains a letter from Headquarters, Marine
Corps, which indicates that the RE-4 reenlistment code was
properly assigned.
of your UDE, it was revealed that you were unsuitable for
reenlistment because you were not recommended for promotion on
several occasions, failed your physical fitness test, had a check
returned due to insufficient funds, and committed misconduct
which resulted in two
This letter also indicates that, after review
NJPs.
to be restricted from serving in the military
The Board, in its review of your entire application, carefully
weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth
and immaturity and your contention that you believe it is an
injustice for you
because of some disciplinary problems that occurred during your
six year enlistment in the Marine Corps.
However, the Board
concluded these factors and contention were not sufficient to
warrant a change in your reenlistment code because of your
misconduct, and since you were not recommended for reenlistment.
An RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is
separated at the expiration of his term of active obligated
service and is not recommended for reenlistment.
circumstances of your case,
code was proper and no change is warranted.
application has been denied.
Given all the
the Board concluded your reenlistment
Accordingly, your
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Executive D
2
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101190
Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04575-01
of the report. 1070 JAM8 A& 2 7 ‘LUJi MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL IN THE CASE OF STAFF SERGEANT SMC LICATION We are asked to provide an opinion on Petitioner's request 1. for the removal from his service record book (SRB) and official military personnel file (OMPF) of all entries related to the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) he received on 16 November 1999. the Petitioner admit receiving NJP, but other command...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00471-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board believed that a record which includes two nonjudicial punishments, several counseling entries, and an alcohol related incident after...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10717-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 15 January 2002 you were honorably discharged by reason of expiration of enlistment and assigned an RE-30 reenlistment code, as directed by CMC. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06100-01
considered your application on After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. That form shows The statement of service also shows that you continued to serve in the Air Force Reserve until you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 22 April 1996. Although an Air Force separation document states that your military obligation termination date was 30...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05514-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 27 January 1989, you enlisted in the Na~ at age 18. On 30 October 1992, you began another UA and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06836-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings -of this Board. in the Marine Corps without prior approval of the Commandant of You were I the Marine Corps. composite score 0 1993 promotion 1992 in his PM0 promotion to co not have the re service record indicates that he had a or the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04938 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04807-01
1552 (1) (2) (3) (4) DD Form 149 w/attachments & Earnings Statement Leave Para 2, Marine Corps Promotion Manual CMC memorandum 1400/3 MMPR-2, 14 Aug 01 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), subject, 1. hereinafter, referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, paygrade record be corrected to show Petitioner was promoted to E-3 effective 1 March 1989 prior to receiving office hours and to be promoted to 1992. paygrade E-4 prior being discharged...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05958-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 18 December 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 3 February 1996 you were You were Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are not recommended for reenlistment or who fail to meet the professional growth criteria for...