DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 203704100
LCC: ddj
Docket No: 2737-00
1 June 2000
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:
Secretary of the Navy
Ref: (a)
Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl:
(1)
(2)
(3)
DD Form 149 w/attachments
CMC memorandum
Subject’s naval record
1400/4A MMPR-2 of 16 March 2000
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show he was assigned an earlier date of rank when he enlisted on 23 July 1999.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Chapman, and Ms. Schnittman, reviewed
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 May 2000 and, pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies
available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.
In correspondence attached as enclosure
(2), the office having cognizance over the
subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
contents of enclosure
following corrective action.
(2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the
Docket No:
2737-O
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a. When Petitioner reenlisted on 23 July 1999 in
of rank of “27 April 1999”.
paygrade E-2 he was assigned a date
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
GLw-5
G. L. ADAMS
Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
1 June 2000
Executive
Direc
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05104-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that on his enlistment he was assigned a date of rank based on his prior service. Hardbower, Madison, and Mr. Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 June 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08742-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be filed enclosure (1) corrected to show his original date of rank was assigned when the administrative reduction in grade was set aside and entitled to back pay for the period of the administrative reduction. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Geisler, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04697-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Y 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON, D.C. 203704100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 4697-00 12 October 2000 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy From: To: S&j : Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04970-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Basic Allowance for Subsistence Ration in Kind (BAS-RIK) not available. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Harrison, Morgan, and Whitener, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 October 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06002-00
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and McCulloch, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: Docket No: 6002-00 That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that the enlistment of 23 December...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06707-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Dunn, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner 2. allegations of error and injustice on 8 February 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, ‘determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04447-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Y 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON, D.C. 20370-5100 : ddj MEH Docket No: 4447-00 11 October 2ooO From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy S&j: AMH REV1 Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07701-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that when placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL), his disability was classified as combat related. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Carlsen, Pfeiffer and Tew, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06837-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reenlistment code more favorable than the code of RE-4 he received on 23 June 2000. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Shy and Goldsmith, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 27 September 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07190-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Enlistment Bonus (EB) entitlement.. 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Milner, and Ms. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 03 April 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...