Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02764-01
Original file (02764-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

CRS
Docket No: 2764-01
15 January 2002

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:
Subj:

Secretary of the Navy

OF2

ECORD 
.-,

(a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Ref:
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments

(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's naval record

filed enclosure (1) with this

that his reenlistment code be

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Navy,
Board requesting, in effect,
changed.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ivins, Hogue, and McBride,'
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9
January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

Documentary material considered by

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.
C . Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 27 August 1998.

September 1998 he was diagnosed as being alcohol and drug
dependent.

On 25

d. On 30 September 1998 the commanding officer directed a void

enlistment by reason of erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse.
Petitioner was separated on 5 October 1998.
At that time he was
assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.

e. Title 10 U.S.C. 978 states that an enlistment may be voided

only if an individual is diagnosed as drug or alcohol dependent

within 72 hours of reporting to active duty.
an individual so diagnosed may be
this time limit is not met,
separted with an entry level separation by reason of erroneous
Additionally, regulations require
enlistment due to drug abuse.
the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an enlistment is
voided or if an individual is separated by reason.of erroneous
enlistment due to drug abuse.

However, even if

f. In his application, Petitioner states that he lied about
his drug abuse and alcohol dependence in order to be separated
from the Navy because he was homesick.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants partial
In this regard it is clear that Petitioner was not
relief.
diagnosed as drug and alcohol dependent within 72 hours of his
entry on to active duty.
record should be corrected wherever necessary to show that he was
separated with an entry level separation.
Concerning the RE-4 reenlistment code, the Board notes that an
RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual receives an
entry level separation resulting from an erroneous enlistment due
Further, even if Petitioner's current version of
to drug use.
events is correct, it is well settled in the law that an
individual who commits a fraud in order to be discharged should
not be able to benefit from that fraud when it is discovered.
Therefore, the Board concludes that the RE-4 reenlistment code is
correct and should not be changed.
RECOMMENDATION:

Therefore, the Board concludes that the

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he

received an entry level separation on 5 October 1998 vice the
void enlistment now of record.

b. That Petitioner's request for a change in the reenlistment

code be denied.

C . That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

d. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's
together with this Report

naval record be returned to the Board,
of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file maintained
for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of
Petitioner's naval record.

2

d. That no further relief be granted.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Acting Recorder

?

KLl~dg

.

3



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01830-99

    Original file (01830-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1830-99 13 August 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To : Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF 0 Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record t I i 1. The regulation requires the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of "erroneous enlistment-alcohol abuse. l1 i. Petitioner states that he did not erroneously enlist nor does he have an alcohol problem.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02684-01

    Original file (02684-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2684-01 21 August 2001 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that the reason for discharge and his reenlistment code be changed. Thereafter, the discharge authority directed that Petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08432-01

    Original file (08432-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. Petitioner was then advised that administrative separation action was being initiated by reasons of erroneous enlistment as evidenced by the diagnosis of alcohol dependence. Additionally, the applicable regulation requires the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of "erroneous entry-alcohol abuse. " That Petitioner's naval record be corrected'by issuing him a new DD Form 214 which reflects that he served on active duty from 8 February to 8 March...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06759-01

    Original file (06759-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an enlistment is voided or if an individual is separated by reason of erroneous enlistment due to alcohol abuse. Concerning Petitioner's request for a change in his reenlistment code, an RE-4 reenlistment code is appropriate in Petitioner's case since he was separated prior to completing recruit training by reason of erroneous enlistment due to alcohol dependency. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he received...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06707-97

    Original file (06707-97.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 12 January 1996. Such a code is required under these An RE-4 reenlistment code is Absent a Accordingly, In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. That Petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9805169

    Original file (NC9805169.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ivins, Rothlein, and Taylor, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 July 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Therefore, the Board concludes that the record should be corrected to show that he was discharged with an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment. That Petitioner's naval record be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03281-08

    Original file (03281-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TUR Docket No: 3281-08 5 February 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF SQ, Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he was separated on 24...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05187-01

    Original file (05187-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, Board requesting, in effect, by changing the reenlistment code assigned on 29 June 1993. that his naval record be corrected filed enclosure (1) with this 2. the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05561-06

    Original file (05561-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs.reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the availabl& evidence of record. On 20 February 1999 Petitioner was issued a void enlistment due to alcohol dependence and was assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.e. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that he was separated on 20 February 1999 with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03047-01

    Original file (03047-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Schnittman, Mr. Mazza, and Mr. Novello, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. within that time frame, Petitioner should have been processed for an entry...