Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02672-00
Original file (02672-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

TRG
Docket No:   2672-00
9  June  200 0

Dear 

v

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on   7 June  2000.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
of this
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Documentation submitted with your application and filed in your
service record reveals that the Military Awards Branch,
Headquarters Marine Corps and the Marine Corps Historical Center
have not been able to establish your entitlement to any campaign
or unit awards for your participation in Operation Teamwork in
Further, the National Archives has reviewed the deck logs
1955.
of the ship you claim to have been aboard but could find no
Therefore, Headquarters Marine Corps
evidence of such service.
has concluded that you are only entitled to the Good Conduct
Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, and the Rifle
Sharpshooter and Pistol Marksman Badge.

Campaign and unit awards cannot be issued unless there is
evidence to support them.
effect, the Board concluded that the actions taken by
Headquarters Marine Corps in this matter are correct. In
addition, the absence of any records means that there is no basis
for favorable action by this Board.
The names and votes of the members
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

Since there is no evidence to this

Accordingly, your

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10020-06

    Original file (10020-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the letter furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC), dated 13 December 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04062-02

    Original file (04062-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record.and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the letter to and policies. including the Bronze Star Medal, However, Subtitle C, Section 526 of the National Defense provides for the consideration of award Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996, which was enacted into law on February 10, 1996, recommendations, you be able to locate your former commanding officer or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05890-01

    Original file (05890-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory and policies. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 2 October 2001, a copy of which is attached. evidence in your records that you were engaged in actions that would entitle you to this award.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06369-01

    Original file (06369-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory In this connection, the Board substantially You are entitled to have the Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01074-01

    Original file (01074-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 2001, a copy of which is attached. they were not present and cannot attest Statements from which would qualify him for the Purple Since there is no indication in the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11028-08

    Original file (11028-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions from HQMC dated 10 December 2008 with references (b) and (c), 22 January 2009 with enclosures, and 26 February 2009 with enclosure (DD Form 215), copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05347-06

    Original file (05347-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Additionally, the Bureau of Naval Personnel informed you on June 24, 1992, and March 8, 1995, that there was no evidence in your records that you were ever injured under conditions which would qualify for the Purple Heart Medal.During the period that you served in the Marine Corps, the Purple...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03975-01

    Original file (03975-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) concurred with the board of generals and denied the recommendation of your former CO. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found no evidence that would warrant rcV1l. Subsequently, the Commandant determined, after reviewing the Consequently, no further action can be taken. the awarding authority, reviews, including those as provided for by Subtitle C, Section 526 of the National Defense Authorization Act for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01001-02

    Original file (01001-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As required by regulations, in order for you to be considered for the award of a personal decoration, Bronze Star Medal, having personal knowledge of your actions must have submitted a recommendation for the award. your case that a recommendation was ever submitted, no further action can be taken. Combat Action Ribbon 3

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07949-99

    Original file (07949-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 June 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by the Military Awards Branch, Headquarters, Marine Corps, dated 27 April 2000, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support Your allegations of...