NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08501-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. "A" SRB entitlement for NEC 3353 Petitioner's - Reference (c), released 20 Nov 1998 with an effective date Dee 1998 carried the zone "A" SRB entitlement for NEC 3353 of 01 at an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08530-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations .and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. On 24 July 1973, you requested discharge under other than honorable conditions for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial for the foregoing two...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08550-98
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Y 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 12 May 1999 8550-98 From: To: Subj : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08559-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. On 7 July 1989, you missed ship's movement and were placed in an unauthorized absence (UA) status until you surrendered on board on 2 August 1989. were being...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08561-98
_( A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Board concluded that the assigned reenlistment code in this case Accordingly, was harmless error and does not warrant removal. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08574-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 1999. submitted included a memorandum, dated 19 February 1997, from the administrative officer to the legal officer stating that you were working in the galley during the period of unauthorized absence. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08587-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged in pay grades E-l and E-2 for failure to meet professional growth criteria. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08615-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The offenses included an unauthorized On 5 February 1957 the commanding officer recommended that you be separated with an undesirable discharge by reason of unfitness based on the civil conviction. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08626-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 2 June 1998, the Record Review Panel of the Physical Evaluation Board found you fit for duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08638-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 1999. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you suffered from a mental disorder which rendered you unfit for duty at the time of your discharge in 1964, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08641-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlisted under the Prise III Program for two (2) years. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Goldsmith, Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08659-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Goldsmith, Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08662-98
Y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:mh Docket No: 8662-98 2 June 1999 From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy HM2 REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD USN, (4 (1) (2) (3) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Goldsmith, and Ivins, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 2 June 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08663-98
The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. Madison, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 March 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. and especially in light of the injustice warranting the Docket No: 8663-98 RECOMMENDATION: That Subject ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Pursuant to the delegation of authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08670-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08713-98
The drug laboratory reported on 23 December received.nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on 9 February 1998 for You use of cocaine. However, the commanding officer denied your request, noting that the reduction was the result of NJP and the action of the ADB did not overturn a judicial proceeding. 2 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08716-98
Subsequently, the suspended undesirable discharge was ordered executed and you were discharged on 14 August 1967. these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization However, the Board concluded that such as your youth and immaturity . Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08726-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was authorized an extension of the 180 day period in which to move his household goods 31 January 1998. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner, Mazza, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08728-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing his failure of selection for promotion before the Fiscal Year 99 Line Lieutenant Commander Selection Board, so as to be considered by the selection board next convened to consider officers of his category for promotion to lieutenant commander as an officer who has not failed of selection for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08749-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1448(f) SBP participants with spouse coverage who become divorced and desire to maintain...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08765-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Accordingly, your application has The names and votes of the members of the panel Since you The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy by applying to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08784-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the allotment to the Delta Dental Plan (DDP) was stopped when Petitioner reported to Okinawa. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, allegations of error and injustice on 30 March 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08787-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to void a reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Kastner, Mr. Mazza, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08804-98
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, and the contentions you made in the attachment to your application. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08842-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1780 SER of which is attached. Reference (c) provided the opportunity for VEAP participants to enroll in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program provided they were on active duty and had contributions in a VEAP Unfortunately, account on 9 October 1996...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08843-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. Hare, Madison, and Mr. Cali, reviewed Petitioner ’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08845-97
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WAW PERSONNEL COMMAND INTEORITY...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08881-97
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 37, authority exists for U.S.C., Section 305a) and no...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 0899-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be filed enclosure corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Goldsmith, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 April 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 09013-97
The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 29 January 1994 and reported to active duty on 13 April 1994. record shows that you received nonjudicial punishment February 1996 for three specifications of failure to obey an order or regulation. "1 was never told about having to day," or words to that statement, to wit: work a half day after our duty effect, which statement was false in that (she) was told by Boatswain's Mate First Class . the punishment was considered to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 09083-97
In light of the information contained in the advisory opinion dated 16 April 1998, that the fitness report in question was forwarded for file on 26 August 1954, the Board found this report was probably in your In view of the above, your application has record for at least the been denied. The second gap identified by BUPERS was for the period of 6 April 1949 to 30 June 1949 and on 29 March 1954 BUPERS requested a fitness report from the member's reporting senior. was Subj: CD USNR(RET) We...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 09321-97
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Y 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 203704100 TRG Docket No: 22 April 1999 9321-97 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. executive,'session, considered your A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in application on 20 April 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 09391-97
The record also shows that during the period from 1 April 1986 to 30 November 1987 you received two consecutive adverse performance In the second evaluation for the period 1 April to evaluations. You were honorably discharged on 1 May 1990 However, you were assigned duties outside At that time you In reaching its decision the Board noted your disciplinary record, adverse performance evaluations and the fact that you elected separation prior to removal from quality control. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 09459-97
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The marks, comments and recommendations contained in the report are the responsibility of the reporting senior.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Case File (PDF Searchable)
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 134-00 8 February 2000 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 February 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Fri Feb 16 10_49_51 CST 2001
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant he would have been assigned had he been promoted in due course. His current date of rank, 24 November 1999, is the date given to him as though he was selected by the FY-99 Active-Duty Lieutenant Line...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Fri Jan 26 13_54_43 CST 2001
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. DC 20350-2000 N REPLY REFER TO 5420 Ser N13OD/159—99 9 Sep 99 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters (NPC—OOZCB) NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF?~~~~M End: (1) BCNR File #03425-99 with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Fri Jan 26 14_11_29 CST 2001
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVYANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD:hd Docket No: 04702-98 19 October 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: ~ REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Fri Jan 26 14_34_26 CST 2001
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your record shows that you served a year without The Board found you enlisted in the Navy on 24 October 1989 at the age of 18. disciplinary incident, but on 7 September 1990 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for two incidents of dishonorable failure to pay just debts. The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Fri Nov 03 10_20_27 CST 2000
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has added your rebuttal statement to your contested adverse fitness report for 2 July to 28 September 1992, and removed references to your not having submitted a rebuttal. the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 3 November 1998, a copy of which is attached. in the report of the PERB in finding that your fitness report at issue should stand.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Fri Nov 03 12_39_20 CST 2000
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 12 April 1999, a copy of which is attached. ~z7-q~v Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure d DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER TO~ 1400...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Fri Sep 22 13_09_06 CDT 2000
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The member b. the member did not achieve the minimum standards as set forth in reference (b), he still received a favorable promotion recommendation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Fri Sep 22 14_00_29 CDT 2000
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 21 May 1999, and a memorandum for the record dated 28 June and 7 July 1999, copies of which are attached. A review of the member’s digitized record revealed the The member signed the report report in question to be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Feb 05 13_50_44 CST 2001
My defense counsel did not question During the (ADB) I was upset that the (ADB) any witness and myself doing (sic) the (ADB) about (0’s) behavior. Naval Military Personnel Manual (MILPERSMAN) make this guarantee applicable to an ADB respondent by stating that such an individual is entitled to “qualified counsel,” and defining that term as “counsel qualified under Article 27(b) of the UCMJ.” Articles 3640200.7 and 3620200.lv of the United States v. Marshall, 45 Strickland, at 687. Article...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Feb 26 10_25_29 CST 2001
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Dunn, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 February 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Feb 26 16_48_04 CST 2001
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Dunn, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 February 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Jan 29 12_45_37 CST 2001
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVYANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:lc Docket No: 4638-99 5 October 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW 0 - - kVAL REC( Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Jan 29 13_00_43 CST 2001
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, flied enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he executed a qualifying extension to establish Continuous Submarine Pay (CONSUB) entitlement when first eligible. Flood, Ms. Taylor, and Ms. Newman , reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 September 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Jan 29 14_14_25 CST 2001
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Concerning the request for a medical discharge the On 29 March 1996, the commanding officer recommended to the discharge authority that the findings and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Jan 29 15_32_38 CST 2001
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.