Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08765-98
Original file (08765-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

CRS
Docket No:
27 May 1999

8765-98

This is in reference to your
naval record pursuant to the
States Code, Section 1552.

application for correction of your
provisions of Title 10, United

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 27 April 1999.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The offenses included unauthorized absences

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 25 June 1997 at
age 19.
Your record reflects that you received four nonjudicial
punishments.
totalling at least 18 days,
stealing candy from a vending machine, assault, breaking
restriction, possession of alcohol in the barracks, consuming
alcohol in a restricted status,
a restricted status,
quarterdeck.

underage drinking on two occasions,

-and urinating in the area of the

wearing civilian clothes while in

While your record does not contain the separation processing
documents, it appears that the commanding officer recommended
that you be separated with an other than honorable discharge by
reason of misconduct and,
authority, the commanding officer's recommendation for separation
discharsed
was approved.
on 
28-May 1998 with an other
of misconduct due to pattern
were assigned a reenlistment

than honorable discharge by reason
of misconduct.
code of RE-4.

The record clearly shows that you were  

after review by the discharge

At that time you

.

Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
when an individual is discharged due to misconduct,
have been treated no differently than others in your situation,
the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment
of your reenlistment code.
been denied.
will be furnished upon request.

Accordingly, your application has
The names and votes of the members of the panel

Since you

The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service should be changed,
since you did not ask for such
consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative
remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
You may apply to NDRB by submitting the attached DD Form 293.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02526-01

    Original file (02526-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01135-09

    Original file (01135-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07727-11

    Original file (07727-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considere@a your -application on 2 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge or a change of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00679-99

    Original file (00679-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and you were discharged with an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug At that time you were assigned a abuse on 13 November 1997. reenlistment code of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07453-01

    Original file (07453-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,.considered your application on 6 February 2002. injustice were reviewed regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. differently than others discharged for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07937-02

    Original file (07937-02.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03882-01

    Original file (03882-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommendation, you elected to waive the right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01379-01

    Original file (01379-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB essentially found that given the nature Discharge Review Board of your offenses and your excellent post service conduct, a discharge under other than honorable conditions was no longer appropriate. such as your youth and desire for However, the Board Concerning your request for a change in the reenlistment code, the Board noted that regulations require the assignment of an 4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08119-02

    Original file (08119-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. after review by the discharge Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged because of alcohol rehabilitation failure. Consequently, when applying for a correction...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06102-07

    Original file (06102-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 December 1993, the separation authority approved the separation recommendation and directed a UD by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. On 4 January 1994, you were so discharged and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are discharged by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...