DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No:
19 May 1999
8574-98
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 5 May 1999.
Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 21 February 1996
at age 20.
Your record reflects that you were an unauthorized
absentee from 5 to 9 December 1996.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
such as the contention that you
were not an unauthorized absentee.
submitted included a memorandum, dated 19 February 1997, from the
administrative officer to the legal officer stating that you were
working in the galley during the period of unauthorized absence.
You also presented a page from a log book that supposedly
confirmed this.
However, no evidence was submitted pertaining to
the response from the legal office or to show that you were
authorized or directed to work in the galley during the period at
issue.
Therefore, the Board concluded that no change to the
unauthorized absence is warranted.
Accordingly, your application
has been denied.
The names and votes of the-members of-the panel
will be furnished
upon request.
The documents that you
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00625-98
The psychiatrist found that you were On 10 January 1997 the ADB found that you had committed a pattern of misconduct and recommended a general discharge. You contend, in effect, The Board requested the nonjudicial punishment evidence from your The Board was aware that command, but no response was received. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03796-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. A review In this military bearing/character, and Your record further reflects that you received an adverse special enlisted performance evaluation for the period of 16 June to 12 November 2001 to document the removal...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00387-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 19 February 1976. Although the request...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9805509
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your late brother's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00008-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12360-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2011. Your request was granted but before you could be discharged you again became an unauthorized absentee. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09325-02
The record appears to indicate that you were confined during the period of 6 to 30 December 1999. Therefore it appears that although you were not an unauthorized absentee during this period, time lost since you were serving the confinement adjudged at the The names SCM. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05078-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08299-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction Of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 26 May 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. considerable clemency was extended to you when your request to avoid trial by court-martial was approved since by this action, you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02684-99
on 2 February 1970 10 April 1970 you 1970 you plead in the county you were processed with this your case July 1970 the Based on your conviction by civil for an administrative discharge. The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your period of unauthprized absence and especially your conviction by civil author$ties of theft. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...