NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Jan 29 15_32_48 CST 2001
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Concerning the request for a medical discharge the On 29 March 1996, the commanding officer recommended to the discharge authority that the findings and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Jan 29 16_00_17 CST 2001
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAWANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 1304-99 21 September 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy ~ T~REVIEWOF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Sep 25 09_11_22 CDT 2000
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your late husband’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. received the BCD. He was sentenced to forfeitures totalling $234 and a About a month later, on 25 June 1945, he received CM On 23 October 1945 he At this The Board also considered your The Board, in its review of your late husband’s entire record and your application,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Sep 25 09_16_10 CDT 2000
You requested replacement of the “2.8” mark in “military appearance” in your enlisted performance evaluation report ending 16 April 1967. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 1999. A review of the member’s record revealed the member was an E—4 at the time of the report.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Sep 25 09_32_57 CDT 2000
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The career planner noted that although you were recommended for reenlistment in June You were recommended for reenlistment. the current CO recommended you for reenlistment and assignment of a RE-3C reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Sep 25 09_39_27 CDT 2000
Administrative separation was again The You were honorably discharged on 30 April 1986 by reason of “Other Physical/Mental Condition-Personality Disorder” and assigned an RE—4 reenlistment code. The discharge processing However, no The fact that The Board noted You In its review of your application, the Board conducted a careful search of your record for any mitigating factors which might warrant a change in the reason for your discharge. reenlistment code to individuals discharged by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Sep 25 10_02_16 CDT 2000
On 31 January 1995, the Record Review Panel of the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) made preliminary findings that Petitioner was unfit for duty because of left foot pain, which it rated at 20 under VA code 5272, for ankylosis of the subastragalar (subtalar) or tarsal joint in poor weight-bearing position. Captain L’s opinion, after reviewing four medical board reports (there were actually five medical boards, dated March 1993, 8 December 1993, 26 August 1994, 22 November 1994 and 5 April...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Sep 25 10_08_50 CDT 2000
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 1999. The officials who rated your condition were required to choose one of the three options under finding (9) in order to establish your basic eligibility for disability benefits administered by the Department of the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Sep 25 11_34_27 CDT 2000
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has modified the contested report by changing the mark in item 14a (“endurance”) from “above average” to “not observed.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 1999. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Sep 25 11_43_12 CDT 2000
In addition to challenging Report C based on perceived violations of reference (c), the petitioner also believes the report reflects more of Lieutenant Co1one1-~~’s bias against him than actual performance. In addition, Lieutenant ColoneElLllIIIIJwas the 2 Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF MAJOR ___ USMC petitioner’s Reporting Senior for the prior three month report, and was the Reviewing Officer on two other...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Dec 28 08_34_06 CST 2000
Petitioner’s application which requests that the entry reflecting his nonjudicial punishment (NJP) of 30 August 1996 be removed from his official records. He received two adverse fitness reports during this period, from two different Reporting Seniors and Reviewing Officers. Petitioner’s Regimental Commander also Petitioner was found guilty of that offense b. Petitioner provides no basis for removal of the record of NJP.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Dec 28 08_47_42 CST 2000
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. and approved, the BCD was ordered executed. Given all the circumstances of your case the The Board further considered However, the Board found the evidence and The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Dec 28 09_38_41 CST 2000
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The record shows that you received Because of leg pain caused by the residuals of a gun shot wound you received prior to entering the Marine Corps, you were processed for a medical discharge. contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Dec 28 11_21_26 CST 2000
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner, Mazza, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Feb 01 10_26_14 CST 2001
1552 End: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Series of Documents (3) Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to show he reenlisted for two (2) years under the Prise III Program. Flood, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 September 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Feb 01 10_59_55 CST 2001
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 September 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Feb 01 11_59_57 CST 2001
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 September 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Feb 01 13_04_27 CST 2001
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 September 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Feb 01 14_03_11 CST 2001
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a 47 month extension. The Board, consisting of Mr. Mimer, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 October 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Feb 01 14_50_25 CST 2001
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In a letter dated 3 July 1999, you were notified by the The Board concluded that the finding of fitness made in your case by the Physical Evaluation Board was warranted, given the absence of unfitting residuals of your stomach surgery at the time of your final periodic examination, and your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Feb 01 14_50_26 CST 2001
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Evaluation Branch DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL 5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 IN REPLY REFER TO 1611 Ser...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Feb 01 15_44_31 CST 2001
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a retired Naval Reserve CDR (0-5), filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that that he be paid for drills performed on 29- 30 December 1993. The advisory opinion at enclosure (2) states that He missed the regularly scheduled Petitioner was authorized 12 paid drills during the period 1 October to 31 December 1993. drills of 4-5 December 1993 but instead drilled on 29-30 December 1993. Therefore, the Board agrees with the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Feb 01 15_47_41 CST 2001
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 913 of 13 August 1999, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Feb 15 15_22_41 CST 2001
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 296-00 8 February 2000 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade.. 2. The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Jan 11 14_02_10 CST 2001
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:tj Docket No: 1687-99 29 June 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: f~$i$ujpL~~ REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 End: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) BUPERS Memorandum 1160 PERS-815 of 3 June 1999 (3) Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Jan 25 09_58_26 CST 2001
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. At the outset, the Board stresses that the petitioner has References (b) not MCO P1610.7E as the argued the provisions of the incorrect directive. Succinctly stated, Lieutenant Colonej~~j& His limited To this end, the board discerns c. While the petitioner argues that the Reviewing...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Jan 25 11_00_10 CST 2001
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to your two disciplinary actions, one of which was a special court-martial for absences However, the Board concluded totalling...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Jan 25 11_15_52 CST 2001
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Jan 25 11_20_10 CST 2001
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Nov 02 10_48_35 CST 2000
in the report of the PERB. Reference (b) is the performance evaluation directive Removal of The petitioner contends that the “outstanding” comments 2. contained in the Section C narrative are inconsistent with the “excellent” ratings in Section B. that reference in Section C to his duties as the Hazardous Material/Waste NCO warranted an observed mark in Item 13b (additional duties) . In his letter appended to reference (a), the Reporting Senior states that the Section C comments reflect a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Oct 12 10_38_11 CDT 2000
considered the advisory opinions furnished by HQMC, dated 24 May 1999, and the Marine Corps Recruiting Command, dated 12 July 1999, copies of which are attached. although Petitioner’s conviction was set aside, the underlying facts may nevertheless support Petitioner’s relief for cause. Once Petitioner’s record is cleansed of all references to his summary court—martial conviction, we conclude it would be appropriate for the Commandant of the Marine Corps to review the cleansed record to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Oct 12 14_04_06 CDT 2000
considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 25 April 1999, a copy of which is attached. Reference (b) governs a totally separate program from the Counseling Program established by reference (c). The two should be applied The Board also offers its Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF GUNNERY SERGEA~’~ ~ USMC c. Contrary to the petitioner’s argument, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Sep 21 09_16_49 CDT 2000
c. age 20. doctor notes that “this condition was not correctable to meet Navy standards” and recommended administrative separation. Therefore, the Board concludes that the RE-4 Additionally, there is no However, the Board This code will alert recruiters that 2 The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner’s naval record so that all future reviewers will be aware of the diagnosis of asthma and understand the reason for the change in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Sep 21 09_17_36 CDT 2000
Further, other individuals stated that you did not notify the command until the third duty day after the arrest. You contend that the arrest was reported on the first day back to work; you were directed not to have any contact with anyone on board the submarine, and therefore could not obtain any witnesses; the executive officer threatened further adverse action if you appealed the NJP; and you were told that you would receive additional alcohol rehabilitation prior to discharge. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Sep 21 09_17_53 CDT 2000
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your record reflects that you received four The offenses included unauthorized While the discharge processing documents are not available, it appears that the commanding officer then recommended that you be separated with a general discharge by reason of misconduct due to commission of a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Sep 21 09_24_46 CDT 2000
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were sentenced to reduction to confinement at hard labor for four months, forfeitures totalling $200, and a bad conduct discharge (BCD). these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of your frequent misconduct and your request...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Sep 21 09_26_32 CDT 2000
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was given a separation code reflecting involuntary separation so he is not indebted for separation pay received. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Mathews, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 July 1999 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Sep 21 09_48_01 CDT 2000
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were ordered The following day you signed a statement that The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 10 December 1993 for eight years at age 23. active duty as an AN (E-3) for a period of 36 months...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Sep 21 09_48_54 CDT 2000
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:tj Docket No: 4406-99 27 August 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: End: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Sep 21 13_06_57 CDT 2000
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 10 August 1998 you received an You were advised of You declined to consult with counsel and Thereafter, the discharge authority Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE—4 reenlistment code to individuals separated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Sep 28 10_56_09 CDT 2000
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVYANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:tj Docket No: 8671-98 22 June 1999 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: J11IL~ REVIEWOF NAVAL REC~D Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Cali, and Ms. Madison, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 08 June 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Feb 13 10_07_59 CST 2001
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER 852/303 of 13 September 1999, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Feb 13 10_53_41 CST 2001
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 October 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Given all the circumstances of your case, the Board concluded your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Feb 13 11_01_31 CST 2001
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to backdate enro1~mentin the Dependent Dental Plan (DDP). The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 October 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Feb 13 14_00_31 CST 2001
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Flood, and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 October 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Feb 13 15_32_58 CST 2001
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered your letter dated 15 June 1999 with enclosures. For us to recommend relief, the petitioner has to show that either there is no rational support for the reporting senior’s action or that the reporting senior acted for an illegal or improper purpose.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Feb 27 09_53_35 CST 2001
1552 End: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC Memo Pers 913 of 15 Jan 00 (3) Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve with eligibility for retired pay at age 60. RTB program, as they apply to this case, allow retirement with eligibility for pay at age 60 for individuals...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Jan 09 10_10_55 CST 2001
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:lc Docket No: 2099-99 26 May 1999 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: LCPL -~ ~ USMC, 1~ REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Jan 30 13_41_54 CST 2001
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of commander she would have been assigned had she been confirmed in the expected time for an officer selected by the Fiscal Year 98 Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Caron, Hogue and Neuschafer reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Jan 30 14_44_25 CST 2001
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 28 September 1999 3638-99 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj Ref: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF juu.turar (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing...