Y
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH:mh
Docket No: 8662-98
2 June 1999
From:
To:
Subj:
Ref:
Encl:
Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy
HM2
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
USN,
(4
(1)
(2)
(3)
Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
DD Form 149 w/attachments
BUPERS memorandum 1160
Subject’s naval record
NPC-815 of 19 April 1999
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to expunge a reenlistment.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Goldsmith, and Ivins, reviewed Petitioner
allegations of error and injustice on 2 June 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
’s
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice, finds as follows:
’s allegations
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies
available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
In correspondence attached as enclosure
(2), the office having cognizance over the
b.
subject matter addressed in Petitioner ’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
contents of enclosure
following corrective action.
(2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the
Docket No: 8662-98
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a. The reenlistment executed on or about 11
reverts to 8 June 2000. Member was erroneously
him to a Selective Reenlistment Bonus.
March 1998 is null and void. EAOS
informed this reenlistment would entitle
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner
’s naval record.
4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
%Q (JQ--- L
G. L. ADAMS
Acting Recorder
Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
5.
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
2 June 1999
Executive
Direc
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 02775-98
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAW ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH: tj Docket No: 2775-98 29 June 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01374-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish increased entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for NEC 5342. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Kastner, and Milner, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 April 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808798
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEB:tj Docket No: 8798-98 29 June 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased zone "B"...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Oct 18 08_15_11 CDT 2000
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reenlistment in paygrade E4 vice E3. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Mathews, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 June 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05684-98
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Y 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:mh Docket No: 5684-98 2 June 1999 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: Encl: FCC(SS) REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD : USN,Docket No: 5684-98 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808056
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone "A" Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the AMS rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Kastner, Ms. Hare, and Ms. Wiley, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 July 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9807860
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH: tj Docket No: 7860-98 29 June 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: (eee REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08448-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the RM rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Kastner, Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08787-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to void a reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Kastner, Mr. Mazza, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08346-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone CM rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Kastner, Mr. Mazza, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...