NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00010-99
p a y g r a d e E - 2 . T h e r e d u c t i o n w a s s u s p e n d e d f o r s i x m o n t h s . W A ) .
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00017-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00020-99
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 28 December 1998, a copy of which is attached. The Board is quick to point out that performance counseling and the official recording of counseling sessions via Page 11 SRB entries are separate and distinctly different Subj : MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISOR SERGEAN N THE CASE OF STAFF SMC administrative actions. What he goes on to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00023-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per MCO 1610.11B, the Performance Evaluation Review Board, with three members present, met on 18 December 1998 to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00030-99
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removal of your contested fitness report for 1 March to 30 September 1993. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice warranting removal of the remaining contested fitness report, for 1 March 1991 to 26 April 1992. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00032-99
p a y g r a d e E - 2 , c o n f i n e m e n t a t h a r d l a b o r f o r a y e a r , f o r f e i t u r e 1 8 1 d a y s . Y o u w e r e s e n t e n c e d t o r e d u c t i o n t o & a n d f o u r p e r i o d s o f u n a u t h o r i z e d a b s e n c e ( U A ) t o t a l l i n g w r o n g f u l a p p r o p r i a t i o n . Y o u w e r e s e n t e n c e d t o c o n f i n e m e n t a t h a r d l a b o r ' f o r a m o n t h a n d f o r f e i t u r e s t o t a l l i n g $ 2 0 0 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00035-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 23 December 1998, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00037-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 11 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00039-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00056-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00080-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00085-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 1999. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00087-98
states that he signed a "Concurrent" on 14 November 1997, of "Early Promote"; however, report from his regular reporting senior, "Periodic Regular" which he received a promotion recommendation of "Progressing". comments in block 43 of the report in question, that the evaluation being submitted is based on the input from the member's TAD command. The reporting senior d. Based on our review, we feel the reporting senior assigned the member a promotion recommendation of "Progressing" due to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00090-99
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH: tj Docket No: 90-99 17 August 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone "B"...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00091-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was authorized Basic Allowance Quarters (BAQ) at the with dependent rate for dependent child. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Milner, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 August 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00093-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00095-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00101-99
Milner, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6 April 1999 that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's b. naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00102-99
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Y 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 203704100 JLP: ddj Docket No: 102-99 22 April 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: S A REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD USN, Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Dunn, and allegations of error and injustice on 30 March 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00105-97
NCPB LEGAL OPINION SUBJ: BCNR ISSUES ICO 8 Dee 98 Address Petitioner's contentions concerning his entitlement 1. to disability rating for his conditions and particularly his contention that the PEB is required to rate all conditions which contribute to an unfitting condition. CODE UNFIT FOR DUTY WITH A 302 7319, V.A. CODE TOTAL RATING TXE TEMPoRAB~ 0~ DLBABrLITY so#, A ND CAbE RETIREMENT AVAILABLE TO THE PANEL WERE THE F,ILB, EVZDENCE HEALTH: RECOR,D> HEALTH RECORD ENTRIES AND A LETTER...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00118-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. performance...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00120-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 14 April 1999, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00130-99
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. S u b j : MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) HE CASE OF USMC The case is forwarded for final action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00137-99
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E NAVY FOR C0RRECTK)U OF NAVAL REcoRoS 2HAwAWmX WAGHINQTO(3 DC 201tOQlOo JLP: tj Docket No: 137-99 10 August 1999 USN Dear SEAMAN APPRENTICE -: naval -rd pursuant to the This is in reference to your application for correction of provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 155 1 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ecords, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Documentary material considered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00148-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (a) BCNR memo Pay of 11 Feb 99 (b) General Accounting Office (GAO) Act of 1974 Per reference (a), recommend the BCNR...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00156-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. J * request to remove reference (b) from his officer rence (a) requested an advisory opinion in response to permanent personnel record due to a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00159-99
in your record. Regulations required the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged command due to substandard performance or by reason of inability to adapt to military service." The Board noted that you have applied for the Navy The Board also noted that the commanding and that your contention that You contend that you NJPs in only 16 months of service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00165-99
disciplinary action during two enlistments and he was not recommended for retention only because he exceeded body fat standards at the expiration of his enlistment. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code, assigned on 18 October 1992, to RE-3T. 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00169-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Na-1 Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 1999. The Board concluded that the foregoing factor and contention were insufficient to warrant recharacterizaton of your discharge given your record of two NJPs and a conviction by a special court-martial in only 14 months of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00172-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant he would have been assigned had he been confirmed in the expected time for an officer selected by the Fiscal Year 99 Lieutenant Line Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ensley, Goldsmith and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00177-99
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC :ddj Docket No: 177-99 1 April 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy K U V I C W Ur N A V A L KELUKU - Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00186-99
You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for six months, forfeitures of $44 per month for six months, and a bad conduct discharge. On 25 March 1957 you waived your right to restoration to duty and requested execution of the bad conduct discharge. Thereafter, the Navy Board of Review approved only a finding that found you guilty of unauthorized absence from 28 December 1956 to 1 February 1957.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00187-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner enlisted on 2 January 1997. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bartlett, Whitener, & Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 June 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00193-99
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. - Petitioner requests the reenlistment contract of 20 Mar 1998 reflect a STAR reenlistment and the automatic advancement benefit under the STAR program for the AN/BQQ-SE Advanced Maintenance and Operations Training at NAVSUBSCOL, Groton, CT. (l), the STS rating had no schools on the CSL at - Per enclosure However, in reference (b)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00195-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. treated no differently than others similarly separated, the Board Since you have been The names and votes of the members of the panel Accordingly, your application has The Board concluded that the reenlistment code was proper could find no error or injustice in your assigned...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00198-99
Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You were ordered to The The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 26 August 1991 for eight years at age 20. active duty for a period of two years on 4 December 1991. record reflects that you were advanced to SN (E-3) and served without incident until...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00200-99
f. Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3E or RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment. The Board believes that if these juvenile offenses committed eight years ago are no longer disqualifying when properly disclosed to National Guard recruiting authorities, he should not have the most restrictive reenlistment code. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code, assigned 21 April 1997, to RE-3E.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00210-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone OS rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Goldsmith, and Ivins, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 2 June 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00211-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 20 January 1999, a copy of which is attached. In his letter appended to reference (a), the Reporting Senior states that the Section C comments reflect a true...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00217-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the CTA rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Kastner, Mr. Mazza, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00230-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 11 January 1999, a copy of which is attached. Certainly poor management of his supply account, as concluded in the investiga- tion and correctly recorded by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00235-99
Y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHtNGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 235-99 1 April 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00239-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Milner, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Madison, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 March 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00242-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A fourth special...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00244-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E3 based on three years participation in the JROTC. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Cali, and Ms. Madison, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 08 June 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00251-99
251-99 1 June 1999 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Secretary of the Navy Naval Records Subj: REVIEW OF OF' Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 5 July 1960. He...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00277-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E2 based on the completion of the required number of college credit hours.. 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Cali, and Ms. Madison, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 08 June 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00280-99
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. servicemembers reenlisting for SRB may receive only However, per - NPC 815 cannot advise petitioner to reenlist at a later date FC(OOO0) rating was "C") because per reference (c), the (for zone not eligible for a zone "C" SRB. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by Enclosure 3. the Board for correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00288-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the correct EAOS. The Board, consisting of Mr. Mathews, Mr. Reid, and Ms. Brown, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 March 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00316-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...