D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAW ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JLP: tj
Docket No: 56-99
10 August 1999
USN
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1133 Ser 334J06287 of 8 July 1999, a copy of
which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. AcwrJingly, your application has bwn denied. The mmcs and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND
8 7 2 0 INTEGRITY DR.
MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 3 8 0 5 4 - 5 0 5 7
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1133
Ser 334106287
8 J u l 9 9
From: Commander, Navy Recruiting Command
To :
Executive Director, Board for Correction of Naval
Records
Subj : BCNR REQUEST ICO SN I., USN,
Ref:
(a) COMNAVCRUITCOM ltr 1130 Ser 21C/000980 of 30 Oct 97
(b) COMNATJCRUITCOMINST 113 0.8E (CRUITMAN-ENL)
Encl: (1) BCNR Docket Nr. 00056-99
1. Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1) . Per reference (a) ,
Marine OSVETS discharged in paygrade E-3 or above who do not have
skills directly convertible to ratings listed in reference (b)
will be enlisted in paygrade E-3. SN-
he does meet the necessary criteria to warrant the advanced
paygrade E-3, but does not warrant paygrade E-4.
record indicates
2. This is
Correction o
an advi
f Naval
ory memorandum ,for use by the Board for
Records onlv. /hnclosure (1) i
returned.
-
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01103-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered ,your application on 10 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02907-99
A threemember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Original record indicates HT3-signed was aware that his request to enlist in paygrade E5 was disapproved due to being overmanned at the E5 paygrade and he acknowledge that his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01740-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00795-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07937-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a) , OSVETS will be enlisted in paygrade E-1 unless they meet reference (b) criteria for enlistment in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04161-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03950-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07207-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER 1999, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00137-99
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E NAVY FOR C0RRECTK)U OF NAVAL REcoRoS 2HAwAWmX WAGHINQTO(3 DC 201tOQlOo JLP: tj Docket No: 137-99 10 August 1999 USN Dear SEAMAN APPRENTICE -: naval -rd pursuant to the This is in reference to your application for correction of provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 155 1 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ecords, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Documentary material considered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00094-02
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 .I LP: yrj Docket No: 94-02 18 June 2002 This is i n reference to your application t'or correction of your naval record p~rsuant to tlie provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, scctiori 1552. A three-memhel- panel of the 13oarcl for ('orrection of Naval Keco~ds, sitting in executive session, considered your application o...