Y
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
ELP
Docket No. 195-99
28 May 1999
Dear
I
This is in reference to your
naval record pursuant to the
States Code, Section 1552.
’
application for correction of your
provisions of Title 10, United
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 1999.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and
procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and injustice
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found you enlisted in the Navy on 30 July 1991 for four
years at age 18.
SA (E-2) on 16 May 1992 and served without any disciplinary
actions.
On 30 June 1994, you were honorably released from
active duty by reason of "reduction in
Naval Reserve, and assigned an
The record reflects that you were advanced to
force", transferred to the
RX-4 reenlistment code.
Regulations provide that individuals who are released from active
duty in pay grades E-l and E-2 are not authorized reenlistment
and assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code is required.
Your
contention that the reenlistment code is wrong is without merit
since an honorable characterization of service does not preclude
the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code.
treated no differently than others similarly separated, the Board
Since you have been
The names and votes of the members of the panel
Accordingly, your application has
The Board concluded that the reenlistment code was proper
could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment
code.
and no change is warranted.
been denied.
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
that
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05850-01
A You were marked 3.0 ("meets The reporting senior noted The evaluation for the period ending 15 July 2000 showed you were now promotable and meeting standards in all categories. discharged from your second enlistment, you had not advanced Therefore, you met the criteria for reenlistment when For the first reenlistment, an However, at the time you were 2 Since you The Board found beyond E-3 and were not recommended for advancement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02390-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 1999. Since you have been treated no differently than others separated under similar circumstances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Sep 25 09_32_57 CDT 2000
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The career planner noted that although you were recommended for reenlistment in June You were recommended for reenlistment. the current CO recommended you for reenlistment and assignment of a RE-3C reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 09321-97
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Y 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 203704100 TRG Docket No: 22 April 1999 9321-97 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. executive,'session, considered your A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in application on 20 April 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01921-99
An RE-4 reenlistment code means that the individual is ineligible for reenlistment without prior approval from Commander, Naval Personnel Command. Absent evidence to the contrary, a presumption exists that action by the Navy to discharge you by reason of "failed physical standards" was both appropriate and proper. Since you received the most favorable reenlistment code authorized by regulation, the Board could find no error or injustice in the assigned reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02295-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02800-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 1999. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01316-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05106-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Bpard consisted Board. Reenlistment beyond the HYT limit of 10 years was not authorized and assignment of an RE-6 reenlistment code was required. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01644-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3G or an RF-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder.