NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 00352-98
... he was placed in an appellate leave status while undergoing disciplinary action and ultimately a GCM.... when his GCM was completed, he had been reduced in rank to private and given a general discharge .... the GCM findings and sentence were overturned on 29 January 1998. In consideration of the above facts, we recommend that Petitioner's records be corrected to show that he was not given a general discharge on 9 March 1998; and that he was transferred to the E'MCR in the rank of staff...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 00460-99
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-51 00 LCC: tj Docket No: 4640-99 11 August 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 00999-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Apparently, no action was taken on your request for discharge because of the unauthorized absence and because even with the new date of birth, you would have been 17 years old on 11 July 1943. The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 01067-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. While there is no evidence that an Axis I psychiatric condition rendered Subject unfit for duty, there is adequate evidence that a personality disorder rendered him unsuitable.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 01657-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct'and especially...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 01725-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by giving him retirement point credit for his Naval Reserve participation during the period 10 August 1959 to 12 March 1962. The Board, consisting of Ms. Davies and Messrs. McCulloch and Molzahn, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5 August 1999, and pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 01747-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your military record shows that on 1 January 1992 you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 01771-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application,on 23 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 02618-98
The Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB in finding that your contested adverse fitness report should not be removed. Regardless, the report under Sub j : MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY LIEUTENAN SE OF FIRST USMC consideration is the official report of record and the one to which the petitioner responded. (7) ~ajor- advocacy letter of 23 November 1998 claims he was not aware that the petitioner 'was involved...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 02643-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Any adverse reenlistment code may be waived and reenlistment or reserve affiliation authorized in the appropriate circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 02775-98
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAW ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH: tj Docket No: 2775-98 29 June 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 02792-98
At that time, Petitioner told CID that he had placed SGT D f s pistol in the ceiling of the casual barracks and requested that CID go with him to get the pistol. After reviewing the facts, the CO noted that Petitioner's wife not only had an affair with SGT D, but also with three other Marines. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing all references in both the service record book and the OMPF to the NJP of 28 July 1995, including, but not limited to, the Offenses and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 02832-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Further, an individual separated by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure must receive an RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 03150-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board carefully considered your contention that your disabilities did not exist prior to your enlistment in the Marine Corps; however, in the absence of evidence which substantiates that contention and demonstrates that your dysthymic disorder was incurred in or agmvated by your naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 03177-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to reimbursement for travel to Narita, Japan. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 03188-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to your six disciplinary actions, one of which was a special court-martial for absences totalling nearly three months. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 03241-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 1999. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge, given the four disciplinary actions and more than a month of unauthorized absence. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 03368-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected to show a better characterization of service than the undesirable discharge issued on 4 June 1970. The Board, consisting of Mr. Kastner, Ms. Hare and Ms. Wiley, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 July 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 03415-98
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 03618-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As you have not explained your failure to report for required examinations, or presented any evidence which demonstrates that the removal of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 03747-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 03785-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade.. 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Dunn, and Ms. Taylor, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 July 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 03817-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repeated misconduct,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 03933-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitkd in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In any event, as you were discharged from the Marine Corps on 23 October 1970, by reason of unfitness, you would not have been entitled to disability evaluation even if you had suffered from a condition considered disabling by the Department of the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 03990-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04002-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the frequency of your misconduct and especially the last two periods of absences which resulted in the general court-martial conviction. Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04010-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your former husband's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. He received an undesirable discharge on 29 December 1975. In this regard, there is no evidence that he received a general discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04067-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 1999. An RE-30 reenlistment code may be assigned to career Marines who receive PCS orders but refuse to extend or reenlist in order to obtain sufficient obligated service to carry out those orders. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04069-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You have submitted a 1996 action in which this Board corrected your record to allow payment of BAQ and VHA from 28 October 1988, the date of birth of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04125-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 1999. On 25 November 1969, a medical board gave you a diagnosis of spondylolisthesis, L-5 on S-1, and recommended that you be discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04225-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Na-1 Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04366-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was assigned to Patrol Squadron 62 in a drill pay status when he enlisted in the Navy Reserve. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Mathews, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 July 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04461-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04583-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. There is no evidence in the record, and you have submitted none, to show that you had medical problems while in the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04695-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 1999. The record further reflects two periods of UA from 2-10 June and 22-23 June 1971, for which no disciplinary action is shown in the record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04778-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a retired officer in the United States Marine Corps Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to establish entitlement to retired pay at age 60. On 10 August 1998 he was informed that he was not eligible for retired pay because he had only been credited with 17 years of qualifying service. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04848-98
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters, Marine Corps, copies of which are attached. d. It is also important to note that Petitioner's battalion commander, not his company commander or company gunnery sergeant, referred his charge to a special court-martial and approved the sentence. We conclude that Petitioner's special court-martial did not result in an error or injustice and should not be removed from his record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04850-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 1999. You received the bad conduct discharge on 15 July 1983. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05047-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the orders assigning him Temporary Duty under Instruction were modified to assign him PCS to Pensacola, FL. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Tew and Ms. Moidel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 August 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05172-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. To have been eligible,- been on active duty and a participant in VEAP on 9 Oct 96.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05195-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05214-98
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 12 and 16 April 1999, copies of which are attached. Until 1 September 1995, as a member of the Ready Reserve, and as such, W= be considered by promotion - - selection boards. A complete review of Lieutenant Commander record reveals that there were no properly considered during either failure of selection per reference (c).
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05353-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05583-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1001/ 1 MMEA-6 of 17 February 1999, a copy of which is attached. - On 7 April 1997, u r n t e His current reenlistment was r enlistment contract was a probationary reenlistment contract.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05586-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner, Mazza, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05613-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 11 August 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from the Headquarters Marine Corps Officer Assignment Branch, Personnel Management Division (MMOA-4), dated 10 August 1998, a copy of which is attached, and the Master Brief Sheets, providrd by MMOA-4, of officers considered by the FY 1996 and 1997 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Boards (five selectees...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05640-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. VIRGINIA 22 134-5 104 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1400/3 MMPR-2 19 Jul 99 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF STAFF SERGEANT- - . He then transferred to the Selected Marine Corps Reserve (SMCR) where he was considered for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05722-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 1999. On 6 April 1948 the Secretary of the Navy mitigated the dishonorable discharge to a bad conduct discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05732-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The member's requested a letter supplement be the promotion recommendation. Only the reporting senior who signed the original fitness report may submit supplementary material for file in the member's record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05737-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board c~nsisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...