Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 00352-98
Original file (00352-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
D E P A R T M E N T  O F  T H E  N A V Y  
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 

2 NAVY A N N U  

WASHINGTON DC  20370-51 00 

TJR 
Docket No:  352-98 
20 May  1999 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records 
To: 

Secretary of the Navy 

Ref:  (a)  10 U.S.C. 

Encl:  (1) DD Form 149 with attachments 

(2) Case summary 
(3) Subject 's naval record 

1.  Pursuant to the provisions of reference  (a) , Petitioner, a 
former member of the United States Marine Corps, filed enclosure 
(1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record 
be corrected by showing he was transferred to the Fleet Marine 
Corps Reserve  (FMCR) on 30 November 1995 as a staff sergeant/ 
( E - 6 ) ,   instead of being discharged on 9 March 1998. 

2.  The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Ms. Nofziger, and Mr. 
Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's  allegations of error and injustice 
on 18 May  1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that 
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the 
available evidence of record.  Documentary material considered by 
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and 
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. 

3.  The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining 
to Petitioner's  allegations of error and injustice finds as 
follows: 

a.  Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all 

administrative remedies available under existing law and 
regulations within the Department of the Navy. 

b.  Enclosure  (1) was filed in a timely manner. 

c.  Petitioner reenlisted in the Marine Corps on 11 November 

1990 after 15 years of prior honorable service. 

d.  Subsequently, Petitioner submitted a written request for 

transfer to the Fleet Marine Corps Reserve  (E'MCR)  to be effective 
30 November 1995.  However, his request was held in abeyance 
pending disciplinary action. 

e.  On 7 October 1995 Petitioner was convicted by general 

court-martial  (GCM) of distribution of marijuana and conspiracy. 
The sentence was approved by the convening authority on 10 May 
996.  He was sentenced to reduction in rank to  private/(^-l), 
confinement for six months, and a back conduct discharge.  On 26 
August  1996, Petitioner was placed on appellate leave pending 
further appellate review. 

f.  Subsequently, a GCM supplemental order of 9 March 1998 

noted that the findings and sentence of the GCM had been set 
aside on 29 January 1998 by the Navy-Marine Corps Court of 
Criminal Appeals, and that Petitioner would be issued a general 
discharge. 

g.  Accordingly, on 9 March 1998, Petitioner was issued a 

general discharge. 

h.  An advisory opinion  (AO) from Headquarters, Marine Corps 

(HQMC), recommends that Petitioner's  record be corrected to show 
that he was not discharged from the Marine Corps but transferred 
to the FMCR. 

The A0 notes in part, as follows: 

(Member) requested a transfer to the Fleet Marine Corps 
Reserve  (FMCR) to be effective 30 November 1995 .... his 
transfer was held in abeyance pending the completion of 
disciplinary action. ... he was placed in an appellate leave 
status while undergoing disciplinary action and ultimately a 
GCM....  when his GCM was completed, he had been reduced in 
rank to private and given a general discharge .... the GCM 
findings and sentence were overturned on 29 January 1998. ... 
charges were subsequently dismissed prior to his discharge 
from the Marine Corps. 

In consideration of the above facts, we recommend that 
Petitioner's  records be corrected to show that he was not 
given a general discharge on 9 March 1998; and that he was 
transferred to the E'MCR  in the rank of staff sergeant, with no 
lost time, effective 30 November 1995 as he had originally 
requested.  We further recommend that his retired pay account 
be established and adjusted accordingly. 

CONCLUSION: 

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the 
Board concludes that Petitioner's  request warrants favorable 
action. 

The Board substantially concurs with the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion and concludes that since the findings and 

sentence of the GCM  were set aside, the record should be 
corrected to show Petitioner transferred to the E'MCR  on the date 
originally approved by HQMC. 

In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an 
injustice warranting the following corrective action. 

RECOMMENDATION: 

a.  That Petitioner's  naval record be corrected by showing 

that he was transferred to the E'MCR  on 30 November 1995 in the 
rank of SSGT/(E-6) vice issued the general discharge actually on 
9 March 1998. 

b.  That Petitioner's  naval record be further corrected to 
show no lost time from 29 September 1995 to 21 February 1996. 

c.  That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating 

to the Board's  recommendation be corrected, removed, or 
completely expunged from Petitioner's  record and that no such 
entries or material be added to the record in the future. 

d.  That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's 

naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of 
this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file 
maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a 
part of Petitioner's  naval record. 

4.  It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's 
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and 
complete record of the Board's  proceedings in the above entitled 
matter. 

ROBERT D.  ZSALMAN 
Recorder 

ALAN  E . GOLDSMIT~ 
Acting Recorder 

5.  Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 
(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of 
Naval Records  (2 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6 (e) ) 
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby 
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the 
authority of reference  (a), has been approved by the Board on 
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy. 

Executive d 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06136-01

    Original file (06136-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by setting aside the dishonorable discharge of 19 January 1999. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing all references to the GCM conviction of 23 August 1996. That the record be further corrected by removing all references to the dishonorable discharge of 19 January 1999.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06245-00

    Original file (06245-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a retired enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) awarded him on 6 May 1998 and the competency review board proceedings that reduced him in rank. CONCLUSION: The Board concurs with the advisory opinion that the NJP In this regard, there is Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07091-99

    Original file (07091-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his memorandum of that date, the SJA set forth Petitioner's record of service and noted that the CG could either approve the recommendation of the ADB and retain Petitioner or recommend to the Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) that Petitioner be discharged notwithstanding that recommendation. SECNAVINST administrative separations in the Navy and Marine Corps. Although Petitioner received NJP for violating SECNAVINST 5300.26B between 1 December 1997 and 31 January 1998, he could not, as a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02064-00

    Original file (02064-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record , From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps submitted an application to this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 15 April 1998 but was retained in the Marine Corps until he qualified to retire. "has an alternate weight standard The fitness report 68" At that time, he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08229-01

    Original file (08229-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner and Rothlein and Ms. Schnittman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 January 2002, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) removed 1996 weight control entries relating to Petitioner from the Marine Corps Total Force System after he had been considered and not selected by the CY 1999 and not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07260-06

    Original file (07260-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 October 1994, the U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence as approved (copy attached). Finally, the authority of the BCNR and the Secretary under 10 U.S.C. has a court martial conviction that was upheld on appeal was reduced to Private E-l by a court-martial (not administratively) pursuant to his free and voluntary guilty plea regarding his “own misconduct.” There are no cases under Title 10 section 6334 or 6336 that override a final...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03494-02

    Original file (03494-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board questing, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by setting aside his reduction from staff sergeant (pay grade E-6) to sergeant (pay grade E-S) effected on 21 February 2001, which was the result of competency review board proceedings. with the greatest dispatch consistent with prudence and professionalism, Marine and the Marine Corps." Following...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01483-01

    Original file (01483-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    period from 20 December 1958 to 28 January 1965 you were a member of the Marine Corps Reserve and earned about four years and six months of qualifying service for reserve retirement. Therefore, the Board substantially T.he Board also considered whether your record could or should be corrected to show that you are eligible for reserve retirement and retired pay at age 60. retirement, an individual must have 20 years of qualifying service and the last eight years must be in the reserve...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05425-01

    Original file (05425-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records indicate that b. Board for Correction of Naval Records for remedial consideration for promotion. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner will be given remedial consideration for paygrade E-8 for CY 98 and CY 99 by the Active promotion to Reserve Staff Noncommissioned Officer Selection Board.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0321 14

    Original file (NR0321 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his RE-2C (transferred to the Fleet Marine Corps Reserve (FMCR) at maximum service limitation for grade) reentry code, issued on 12 April 2012, be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Clemmons, Mr. Tew, and Ms. Henkel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 March 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations,...