NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05839-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05891-98
In addition, it is a surgery that is frequently performed in the event of graft impingement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, when a patient fails to return to full extension, as in this case. On 9/20, the patient underwent the procedure, a right knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. His motion at that time was 0-100 degrees of flexion.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05917-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) is the performance evaluation directive governing submission of the report.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05938-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Mathews, and Ms. Madison, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 February 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06037-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 29 December 1981. Petitioner became 60 years old on 30 July 1997. d. At enclosure (2) is an advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps which states, in part, as follows: This Branch would have no...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06102-98
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To : Secretary of the Navy TRG Docket No: 6102-98 24 August 1999 D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 2 NAVY ANNEX Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF - Ref: (a) Title 1 0 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the United States Naval Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his previous general discharge and RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06170-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You acknowledged that if you did not reenlist or extend as required, you would not be recommended for reenlistment and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06443-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Enlistment Bonus (EB) entitlement. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Swarens, Dunn, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 August 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06553-98
Since Petitioner was in good standing in the Marine Corps Reserve and would have been retired if he requested it prior to discharge, the Board concludes that his record should be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve in the grade of MGYSGT. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand his status in the Retired Reserve. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06583-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 January 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Given his request he is not entitled to any further pay from the U.S. Government.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06586-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WAVY P E R I O W W U C O Y Y A N D 5720 IWTE9RWY DRIVE MILLIWOTON I N 38055-0000 1830 Pers823 Ser 45 1 1 Jun 1999 Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO - Ref: (a) Pers-OOXCB ltr of 3 1 March 1999 NAVAL RECORDS Encl: (1) BCNR File with Microfiche Service Record MEMORANDUM...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06695-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (I), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by granting him two more days of service, so that he will have a total of 24 years, rather than 23 years, 11 months and 28 days. Each month, all active duty service members receive a leave and earnings statement (LES) which shows their pay entry base date (PEBD). That Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06956-98
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY . Y o u a r e a d v i s e d t h a t r e c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e c a s e w i l l b e g r a n t e d o n l y u p o n t h e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f n e w a n d m a t e r i a l e v i d e n c e n o t p r e v i o u s l y c o n s i d e r e d b y t h e B o a r d a n d t h e n , o n l y u p o n t h e r e c o m m e n d a t i o n o f t h e B o a r d a n d a p p r o v a l b y t h e A s s i s t a n t S e c r e t a r y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY RECORDS 18 1. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06988-98
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No: 6988-98 23 August 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL REC-RD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bartlett, Ensley and Schultz, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 August 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07189-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your application on 19 August 1999. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your discharge was erroneous or unjust, and shows that you were unfit by reason of physical disability at that time, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07190-98
The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Tew and Ms. Moidel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 August 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand Petitioner status in the Retired Reserve. That Petitioner's naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07204-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 January 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 140013 MMPR-2 of 8 December 1998, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07213-98
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has modified the contested report by changing the mark in item 14a ("endurance") from "above average" to "not observed. " Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE N A W HEADQUARTERS U N I T E D STATES M A R I N E CORPS 3280 R U S S E L L ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 1 3 4 - 5 1 0 3 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1610 MMER/PERB 5 Oct 98 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07267-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he I~ad at least 14 nionths of active service beyond his new shore rotation date to establish entitlement to Continuous Submarine Pay (CONSUB). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Cali, and Ms. Madison, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 08 June 1999...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07309-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Since you have been treated no differently than others who have been similarly detached, the Board finds no basis for removing the NJP...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07383-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 1999. The Board concluded that the foregoing factors and contentions were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of two NJPs, three summary courts-martial convictions, and a special court-martial conviction. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07460-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Given all the circumstances of your case the.Board concluded your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07464-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 24 October 1973 you submitted a written request for immediate execution of the BCD. veterans1 benefits after being discharged with a BCD.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07500-98
The evaluation from Fitzsimons Medical Center was forwarded to the discharge authority as enclosure (10) to the commanding officer's letter of 3 May 1988, which recommended your discharge. In addition, the commanding officer stated in his endorsement to your letter of 21 June 1988, in part, as follows: I Subject member was properly informed of his rights concerning his administrative discharge, and he signified his understanding of those rights on the "Notice of an Administrative Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07511-98
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 22 February 1999, a copy of which is attached. Per MCO 1610.11B, the Performance Evaluation Review Board, with three members present, met on 12 February 1999 to consider Staff sergean- Removal of the fitness report for the period 971001 to 971231 (AN) was requested. His primary duty was that of a "recruiter" and the overall evaluation documents his performance in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07563-98
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAW ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP: tj Docket No: 7563-98 22 June 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07639-98
The new statements at enclosures (2) through (4) of your current application, among these a statement from the reviewing officer who acted on your fitness report at issue, did not persuade them that this report should be removed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, Major Performance Evaluation Review Board for removal from the record of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07647-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E3 based on the completion of the required number of college credit hours.. 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Dunn, and Ms. Taylor, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 July 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07664-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. D C 2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 ~ 1 3 0D1/ 148-99 11 AUG 99 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF - NAVAL RECORDS Encl: (1) BCNR File # 07664-98 with Microfiche Service Record 1. N130 recommends deny receive an Enlistment Bonus (EB) .
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07734-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code given your refusal to reenlist.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07754-98
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:mh Docket No: 7754-98 30 March 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show continuous service. The Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07823-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable .. statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07848-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant commander he would have been assigned had he been confirmed in the expected time for an officer selected by the Fiscal Year 98 Lieutenant Commander Line Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs....
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07865-98
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. b. Petitioner complains that his platoon commander was the "judge" of his competency review board. MARINE CORPS serve on Petitioner's competency review board, no matter how much or how little he knew about Petitioner's case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07911-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board was not persuaded that you lacked mental responsibility at the times you committed the offenses which resulted in your discharge, or that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07915-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of commander he would have been assigned had he if confirmed in the expected time for an officer selected by the Fiscal Year (FY) 98 Commander Line Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McCulloch and Molzahn...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07929-98
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAW ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC: tj Docket No: 7929-98 23 June 1999 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07937-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a) , OSVETS will be enlisted in paygrade E-1 unless they meet reference (b) criteria for enlistment in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07938-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07956-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 1999. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07991-98
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP: tj Docket No: 7991-98 22 June 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD - - Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Cali, and Ms. Madison, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 08 June 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07995-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The fitness report itself represents the opinions of the reporting senior. The reporting senior stated in his reclama her fitness report was based purely on the member's performance for this reporting period.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08083-98
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Cali, and Ms. Madison, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 08 June 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board's review and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08115-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. -is not entitled to both NCF and EB, and therefore is no longer eligible for EB.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08116-98
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-51 00 JLP: tj Docket No: 8 1 16-98 22 June 1999 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD - - - Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (I) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08202-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure ( I ) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that on 16 September 1998, date of transfer from ship to shore, he had at least 14 months of active service beyond his new shore rotation date to establish CONSUB Pay entitlement.. 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Cali, and Ms. Madison, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08214-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08224-98
The Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB in finding that no correction of your fitness report record was warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, he unsuccessfully petitioned the Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) for removal of the fitness report for the period 970125-970731 and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08271-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was separated or retired by reason of physical disability. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Milner and Molzahn and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 July 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08285-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Quarters (BAQ) at the with dependent rate. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Carlson, and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 March 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...