ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013514
Applicant Name: ????? On 7 January 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. On 26 January 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013516
Applicant Name: ????? With this said, she is asking that the board upgrade her discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013521
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013522
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "I was released for medical reasons, and I feel the service I gave was honorable. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013529
On 23 June 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, other designated physical or mental conditions, by reason of diagnosis with an adjustment disorder with depressed mood, occupational and family stressors; the severity of his conditions results in significant impairment in his ability to function in a military environment, with an honorable discharge. On 24 June 2009, the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013534
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 6 August 1996, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for failing the Army Physical Titness Test (APFT) on (960502) and (960726) with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The evidence of record shows that the applicant consulted with legal counsel and requested consideration of his case by an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013535
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The Board found that the length and quality of the applicant's service to include her combat service, and her post service accomplishment, mitigated the discrediting entries in her service record. Board Action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013537
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 September 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense for testing positive for marijuana (080229), and that he be retained. On 24 June 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013567
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 May 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct for committing a series of disciplinary actions, to include failing a command urinalysis, absent without leave, and being dropped from the unit and military rolls, with a general, under honorable conditions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013575
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 October 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for failing to be present and on time for formations on numerous occasions and failing to obey lawful orders from commissioned officers, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013592
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: ?????
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013597
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 March 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for his inability to adapt to the military environment and his continued enlistment will adversely impact on military discipline, good order and moral with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013638
Applicant Name: ????? On 24 November 2004, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Further, the analyst noted that on 28 June 2006, the Army Discharge Review Board upgraded the applicants discharge to a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013785
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 12 November 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c(1), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for AWOL (081022-081111),received a Company Grade Article 15 for failure to report a total of six times, and willfully disobeying a lawful order from a SFC, with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013895
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended approval of the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013910
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the board that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. However, the board determined that the reason for discharge was fully supported by the record and voted not to change it.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013912
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 April 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for being unable to meet the minimum standards for successful completion of Basic Combat Training due to his inability to adapt to the military environment, his refusal to train, and his stating that he no longer wanted to be in the Army, with an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013914
On 23 January 2003 the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013917
Applicant Name: ????? On 11 February 2010, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013978
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014022
On 20 June 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014026
Applicant Name: ????? By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and the misconduct diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014028
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of a pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014060
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 September 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconductabuse of illegal drugs, for wrongfully importing and using cocaine, wrongful using marijuana, and for failing to report to his designated place of duty, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014071
On 27 July 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The analyst found the length of the applicant's service to include his combat service, mitigated the discrediting entries in his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014074
Applicant Name: ????? On 23 February 2005, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived his right to an administrative separation board contingent upon receiving a discharge no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 3 March 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014078
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 000810 Discharge Received: Date: 000929 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: 46th Chemical Company, 2nd Chemical Battalion, Fort Hood, TX Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (990323-000423) for 398 days. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014093
Applicant Name: ????? On 15 February 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014106
Applicant Name: ????? On 4 August 1998, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: The Board voted to administratively change block 27, reentry code to 3."
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014131
Applicant Name: ????? On 12 January 1999, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014146
Applicant Name: ????? A Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014161
Applicant Name: ????? On 10 September 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014177
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. The analyst noted...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014181
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 April 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he had multiple offenses of failing to report to his appointed place of duty, apprehended for driving while intoxicated, for which he received a General Officer's Memorandum of Reprimand, his driving privileges was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014200
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 July 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for testing positive for cocaine and marijuana (090528), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014219
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014225
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 27 December 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for receiving a Field Grade Article 15 on (071020) and a Company Grade Article 15 on (071215) with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014226
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014230
Applicant Name: ????? On 17 April 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and submitted a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014256
Applicant Name: ????? On 22 December 2009, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) reviewed the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014277
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Even though the applicant did not state a type of characterization of service on her DD For 149 that she submitted, the Army Discharge Review Board looks at the narrative reason for separation and the characterization of service granted, which falls under the purview of this board.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014282
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 061208 Discharge Received: Date: 061219 Chapter: 14-12b AR: 635-200 Reason: Pattern of Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: HHC, 4th Avn Bn (ASSLT), Fort Hood, TX Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 060901, Failing to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty (060825), derelict in the performance of his duties (060825), disobeying a lawful command from a superior commissioned officer (060825),...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014296
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "I received a Chapter 5, AR 635-200, and Chapter 13 for unsatisfactory performance with characterization of service, General under Honorable, for being unable to pass the physical fitness test. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014302
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014306
Facts and Circumstances: On 3 December 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition for being diagnosed by competent medical authority with an adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood and exercise-induced asthma which were incompatible with military service and recommended the applicants discharge with an honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014311
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014317
The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014320
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 June 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that she wrongfully used marijuana between on or about (081130-081230), and wrongfully had sexual intercourse with a married man who was not her husband between on or about (070800-070900), with a general,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014334
Applicant Name: ????? On 17 December 2005, the separation authority waived the applicant's rights to a hearing before an administrative separation board, waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014345
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NA Discharge Received: Date: 960701 Chapter: 3 AR: 635-200 Reason: Court Martial RE: SPD: JJD Unit/Location: B Company, 2nd Battalion, 16th Infantry Regiment, Fort Riley, KS Time Lost: Military confinement from (950504-950930) for 159 days; as a part of the punishment imposed from his special court martial. After a thorough review of the applicants records and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause...