Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014296
Original file (AR20100014296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/05/05	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, "I received a Chapter 5, AR 635-200, and Chapter 13 for unsatisfactory performance with characterization of service, General under Honorable, for being unable to pass the physical fitness test.  I would like to request a change in my discharge status due to the following: During my service I was assigned to the same unit, as a mental health specialist.  I was assigned to work in the division medical clinic and not at my unit.  I believe that my assignment to the clinic did not give my Unit Commander, who was newly assigned, adequate time to evaluate my service performance.  PT was the only time that my commander had the opportunity to observe my performance.  My NCOIC was required to recommend that I be chaptered due to my inability to pass the PT test.  I was counseled multiple times that I would be recommended for promotion due to my satisfactory performance as a soldier and mental health specialist, once I was able to pass the PT test.  During my time in service of 4 years and 11 months, I was on profile more time than not, due to being pregnant twice.  As a permanent party soldier I was off profile for 11 months after my first pregnancy before being put back on it because of my second pregnancy.  Then I was off of that profile approximately 9 months before my commander started my chapter proceedings.  Therefore, I believe that my characterization of service should be changed from General under Honorable to Honorable".  

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 020920   Chapter: 13-2f       AR: 635-200
Reason: Physical Standards	   RE:     SPD: JFT   Unit/Location: E Co, 704th DSB, DISCOM, Ft Hood, TX 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  18
Current ENL Date: 971002    Current ENL Term: 6 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	4 Yrs, 11Mos, 19Days ?????
Total Service:  		4 Yrs, 11Mos, 19Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 91X10 Mental Health Specialist   GT: 115   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Seaside, CA
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted



VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13-2f, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for failure to pass the last three record APFTs, indebtedness and failure to report with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  She was advised of her rights.  
       
       On 30 April 2002, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The applicant was not transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the requirements and procedures for administrative discharge of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 13-2e of this regulation, states in pertinent part, that separation proceedings will be initiated for Soldiers without medical limitations who have two consecutive failures of the Army Physical Fitness Test.  The reason for discharge will be shown as unsatisfactory performance/physical standards.  Service of Soldiers separated because of unsatisfactory performance/physical standards for failure of the Army Physical Fitness Test will be characterized as honorable or general, under honorable conditions.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as well as the incidents of unsatisfactory performance.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of the service was not consistent with the Army’s standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  By the unsatisfactory performance, the applicant diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable characterization of service.  
       
       Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant issue that her commander did not have a chance to observe her performance; however, the analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command.  The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 21 January 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 214

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

























Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100014296
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008012

    Original file (AR20080008012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    I received my Discharge papers a few weeks later and I seen that I had been discharged “General, Under Honorable Conditions”. I was in the military a total of nine years and six months, and in that time I failed two consecutive Physical Training test not more than forty-five days apart. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004930

    Original file (AR20090004930.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    I do not feel that difficulty maintaining my run time at the end of my military career should characterize all of my time in the military as anything less than honorable. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 July 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for failure to meet the minimum standards on two consecutive record Army Physical...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013557

    Original file (AR20080013557.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Service of soldiers separated because of unsatisfactory performance for failure of the Army Physical Fitness Test will be characterized as honorable or general, under honorable conditions. By the unsatisfactory performance, the applicant diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable characterization of service. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023364

    Original file (AR20100023364.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, paragraph 13-2f by reason of physical standards, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, paragraph 13-2f by reason of physical standards, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015274

    Original file (AR20080015274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 December 1995, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for her lack of potential for continued Army service and rehabilitation efforts are no longer practical, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010825

    Original file (AR20080010825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 October 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for consecutive failures of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. Service of Soldiers separated because of unsatisfactory performance for failure of the Army Physical Fitness...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000046

    Original file (AR20100000046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13-2f, AR 635-200, by reason of physical standards, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 14 December 2009.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012450

    Original file (AR20090012450.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001878

    Original file (AR20080001878.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for receiving an Article 15 for AWOL (001127-001219); counseled for disrespect towards NCOs; stealing phone services; missing equipment; taking unauthorized passes and unsatisfactory PT performance, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100026905

    Original file (AR20100026905.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the Board that the narrative reason for separation on the DD Form 214 be changed to "Physical Standards" with the corresponding separation code of "JFT." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: "Physical Standards" under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, with the corresponding separation code of "JFT."