Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014026
Original file (AR20100014026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/04/28	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, "I am a very strong willed, determined to doing great things with my life. My discharge is under honorable conditions, but I lost my G.I. Bill that I risked my life for every day of an entire year in Iraq. I failed 1 urinalsys when we got back from deployment, as a Sergeant, with absolutely nothing else bad on my record for the prior 4 years. My new Battalion Commander told me he was going to make an example of me, even though the rest of my chain of command stood up for me and requested to retain me. I do not deny smoking marijuana, but they kicked me out so fast I didn't even have a chance to try to rehabilitate what so ever. I would like to go to college, and spent the past for years of my life knowing that once I finished my service that I would be able to go get my degree, now that is gone. I am a very strong working, smart man that would like to continue my education and get this "drug abuse" discharge cleared up so I can move on with my life to do good things. Please take this request into strong consideration, I will not let you down!"

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 100308
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 100329   Chapter: 14       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: NIF   Unit/Location: C Co, 3/21 Inf, Ft Wainwright, AK 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 100208, wrongfully use marijuana (091212-100111); reduction to E4, forfeiture of $1047 pay per month for two months, extra duty and restriction for 45 days and oral reprimand (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  22
Current ENL Date: 060413    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  16 weeks
Current ENL Service: 	3 Yrs, 11Mos, 17Days ?????
Total Service:  		3 Yrs, 11Mos, 17Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E5		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 11B10 Infantryman   GT: 116   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Alaska, SWA   Combat: Iraq (080920-090920)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAM, ACGM, NDSM, GWOTSM, ICM w/CS, ASR, OSRx2

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Davison, MI
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted





VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 24 February 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—abuse of illegal drugs with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  
       
       On 3 March 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 11 March 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
       
       The record contains a CID report dated 2 February 2010 citing the applicant with controlled substance violation, use of marijuana. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  The applicant by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the special trust and confidence placed in a non-commissioned officer (NCO).  The applicant, as a NCO, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and the misconduct diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       Furthermore, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.
       
       Further, the analyst noted the applicant's contention that his commander was going to make an example of him, however, the analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command.  The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  
       
             The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he was not allowed time to rehabilitate.  However, AR 600-85 states that action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however; a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 21 January 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 214

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100014026
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007524

    Original file (AR20090007524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001571

    Original file (AR20090001571.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 6 October 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for misconduct, abuse of illegal drugs, with a recommendation to retain her in the United States Army. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090014539

    Original file (AR20090014539.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 27 June 1996, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018945

    Original file (AR20070018945.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 6 September 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014022

    Original file (AR20100014022.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 June 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003732

    Original file (AR20080003732.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 13 July 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015573

    Original file (AR20070015573.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 12 January 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for being counseled numerous times for substandard performance; received a Summarized Article 15 for disobeying a lawful order (980925); and received a Field Grade Article 15 for driving drunk (981221), with a...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012060

    Original file (AR20060012060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 20 May 2006, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005610

    Original file (AR20080005610.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 6 June 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern of misconduct for being derelict in the performance of his duty (040908), failing to go to his prescribed appointed place of duty X 4 (040927, 050212, 050212, and 050412), disrespectful in deportment towards a noncommissioned officer (040927), writing...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008986

    Original file (AR20090008986.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? If my discharge could in anyway be changed from General under honorable to Honorable it would assist in the furthering of my success which wouldn't be possible without my military experiences." On 12 October 2007 , the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.