ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100029833
Applicant Name: ????? On 13 June 2003, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100029915
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 April 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11-3a, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for his inability to adapt to a military lifestyle and lack of respect for authority, with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030025
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 100430 Chapter: 14-12b AR: 635-200 Reason: Pattern of Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: 3rd Infantry Battalion, Honor Guard, Military District of Washington, Fort Myer, VA Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. However, these efforts do not provide the Board a basis...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030028
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 15 May 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he tested positive for hashish during a urinalysis on (080226), and violated a lawful general regulation by wrongfully consuming alcoholic beverages while on deployment to JRTC on (061111), with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030033
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 February 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he received a Company Grade Article 15 for disrespecting a noncommissioned officer, a Field Grade Article 15 for failing to be at his appointed place of duty, disrespecting a noncommissioned officer, disobeying a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030053
Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2010/12/16 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 September 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he tested positive for marijuana on (100713), and to include any other misconduct, with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030081
It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. Furthermore, notwithstanding the propriety of the applicant's discharge, the analyst found that someone in the discharge process erroneously entered on the applicant's DD Form 214, block 24 characterization of service as general, under honorable conditions. In view of the foregoing, the analyst...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030084
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 December 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance in that he was counseled on numerous occasions for failing the Army Physical Fitness Tests, unsatisfactory performance and lack of motivation, failing to be at his appointed place of duty, failing to manage his finances and to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030134
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. This single incident of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of the applicant's service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030181
Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. However, this is not a reason for the Board to change the characterization or reason for the discharge under review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030185
Applicant Name: ????? On 27 October 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030188
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. The burden of proof remains with the applicant to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030201
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 December 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11-3a, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for not meeting the physical fitness standards required to graduate basic combat training and was in the STRIKE program for over 5 weeks and was unable to do the bare minimum. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030205
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030257
Applicant Name: ????? On 3 December 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030317
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 May 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduc-commission of a serious offense; in that he went AWOL from (080205-080304), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 27 May 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030355
On 16 April 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in her own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an uncharacterized separation of service. The analyst found that at the time of discharge the applicant had completed a total of 6 months and 6 days of active military service and was no longer in an entry level...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030356
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030427
Applicant Name: ????? On 10 December 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030428
The evidence of record indicates the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. After a thorough review of the applicants records and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030446
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 July 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13-2a, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance in that he continued to have financial difficulty with his creditors even after seeking financial counseling with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 29 July 2003, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030447
Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030453
Applicant Name: ????? On 24 August 1999, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030454
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 081204 Discharge Received: Date: 090128 Chapter: 14-12c (1) AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct (AWOL) RE: SPD: JKD Unit/Location: 571st Military Police Company, 504th Military Police Battalion, Fort Lewis, WA Time Lost: AWOL x 2 from (080604-080617) for 14 days, the applicant returned to his unit, and military confinement from (080812-080903) for 22 days as part of his punishment imposed from a Summary Court-Martial. On 4 December...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030490
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. Each case is decided on its own merits when an applicant submits a DD Form 293 requesting a change in discharge or reentry eligibility code.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100107842
Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | ar20100017943
Applicant Name: ????? On 5 June 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: The Board voted to direct ARBA Promulgation Team- Arlington to administratively correct block 27, reentry eligibility (RE)...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | ar20100024130
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 080721 Discharge Received: Date: 080730 Chapter: 7-15 AR: 635-200 Reason: Erroneous Entry RE: SPD: JFC Unit/Location: HHC, 43rd AG Bn, Fort Leonard Wood, MO Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 July 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of...