Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014161
Original file (AR20100014161.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/04/21	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he is currently enrolled in Sanford-Brown College to further his education in the medical field. He needs some help with his monthly bills so he can continue to attend and graduate. He has received a PELL Grant and Stafford Loan that will  pay for his school, but it will not be enough to take care of his families needs to maintain his house hold. He is hoping to upgrade his discharge so it will help open up doors for him to apply for loans, grants and scholarships.  

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 990901
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 990927   Chapter: 14-12b       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKA   Unit/Location: 401st Military Police Company, Task Force Eagle Base, Bosnia and Herzegovina 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 990706, being posted as a rear BUB guard, he was found sleeping upon his post on or about (990610), reduction to Private (E-1), forfeiture of $484.00 pay per month for two months, extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG)

Article 15, 990507, disobeyed a lawful order from a LTC, his superior commissioned officer on or about (990322), dereliction of duty, in that he negligently failed to properly maintain awareness by falling asleep while on duty as a gunner convoy, as it was his duty to do on or about (990411), reduction to Private (E-2), forfeiture of $251.00 pay, restriction and extra duty for 14 days (CG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  20
Current ENL Date: 980108    Current ENL Term: 5 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	1 Yrs, 8 Mos, 20 Days ?????
Total Service:  		1 Yrs, 8 Mos, 20 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 95B10 Military Police   GT: 107   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Bosnia and Herzegovina   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: The applicant stated in his issue that he is currently enrolled in Sanford-Brown College to further his education in the medical field.



VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 28 August 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he has been counseled for disobeying an officer, dereliction of duty, sleeping on guard duty, which conduct has caused him to receive two Article 15's within a two month period, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. 
       
       The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On 10 September 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.  

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance. 
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he is currently enrolled in Sanford-Brown College to further his education in the medical field and that he needs some help with his monthly bills so he can continue to attend and graduate.  He has received a PELL Grant and Stafford Loan that will  pay for his school, but it will not be enough to take care of his families needs to maintain his house hold. 
       
       The analyst acknowledges the applicant’s accomplishment since separation from active duty.  The applicant is to be commended for his efforts.  However, this accomplishment does not provide the Board a basis upon which to grant relief.  Further, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.  Additionally, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 14 January 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 29 March 2010.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change

















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100014161
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110007840

    Original file (AR20110007840.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 25 May 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019098

    Original file (AR20090019098.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 28 October 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he engaged in numerous acts of misconduct that has included being drunk on duty on more than one occasion; numerous failures to report to work, failure to follow lawful orders, occasional absenteeism, and substandard...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009249

    Original file (AR20060009249.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Current ENL Service: 05 Yrs, 09 Mos, 07 Days ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. On 21 May 2004, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005147

    Original file (AR20080005147.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060017849

    Original file (AR20060017849.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKA (i.e., misconduct-pattern of misconduct). That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12b by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct, with...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000203

    Original file (AR20100000203.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010003

    Original file (AR20090010003.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 3, Section IV, establishes policy and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge; and provides that a Soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial; and that the appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100019316

    Original file (AR20100019316.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 September 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for failure to report to his designated place of duty on several occasions, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 13 April 2005, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver request, waived further...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100022924

    Original file (AR20100022924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120002537

    Original file (AR20120002537.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? While the applicant's misconduct is not condoned, the analyst determined that the overall length and quality of the applicant's service, to include the combat service, and the supporting independent medical documents; to include his medical care while on active duty, mitigated the discrediting entries in the service record. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment...