Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014060
Original file (AR20100014060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/05/03	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states:  "I was told that I could have my Discharge changed to a General Discharge 6 months after being seperated from the Army. I believe I wasnt properly evaluated by mental health services. If you look through my medical file you will see that I was being treated for PTSD, Clinical Depression and Bi-Polar disorder. After my tour to Afghanistan I was having alot of problems fitting back into normal military discipline, and civilian life. I belive if I would have been given the opportunity to have taken in-patient rehilibation. I could have gotten my self back on track, to the good soilder that I was before. I believe they made an example of me. As you can see by my ARTICLE 15 BEING POSTED ON THE WALL FOR ALL OTHER SOILDERS TO SEE. AND THE ARTICLE 15 IS STILL ON THE WALL AT THE POST. Any Help I can receive through you as a board is greatly appreciated."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 090901
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 091002   Chapter: 14-12c(2)    AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: HHC, 2d EN Bn, Fort Bliss, TX 

Time Lost: 13 days, military confinement (090915-090927).

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 090915, wrongfully used marijuana on divers occasions (090728-090828), wrongfully used cocaine (090510-090520), wrongfully introduced some amount of cocaine onto the installation (090519), failed to report to his designated place of duty on six occasions between 20 February 2009 and 10 August 2009.  Reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $500, confinement for 15 days (SCM).

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  26
Current ENL Date: 060330    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	03 Yrs, 05Mos, 20Days ?????
Total Service:  		03 Yrs, 05Mos, 20Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 21B10/Combat Engineer   GT: 97   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: SWA   Combat: Afghanistan (070310-080525)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, MUC, NDSM, ACM, OSR, NATO MDL

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 1 September 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—abuse of illegal drugs, for wrongfully importing and using cocaine, wrongful using marijuana, and for failing to report to his designated place of duty, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  
       
       On 9 September 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 25 September 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issues submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service his below that meriting a general, under honorable conditions or a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant’s issue about his request for an automatic upgrade.  However, the U.S. Army does not have, nor has it ever had, a policy to automatically upgrade discharges.  Each case is decided on its own merits when an applicant submits a DD Form 293 requesting a change in discharge.  Changes may be warranted if the Board determines that the characterization of service or the reason for discharge or both were improper or inequitable.
       
       The applicant contends that he did not receive any help from his chain of command.  However, the analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command.  The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  
       
       Additionally, the record does not support the issue that the applicant suffers from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and no evidence to support it has been submitted by the applicant, that the discharge was the result of any medical condition.  
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 10 December 2010         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 214.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA


















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100014060
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007193

    Original file (AR20100007193.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? My discharge was inequitable because I have been diagnosed with PTSD and ADD and I am taking medications for these mental illness conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008984

    Original file (AR20090008984.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004713

    Original file (AR20080004713.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The Board found that the overall length and quality of the applicant's service to include his combat service, mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090005777

    Original file (AR20090005777.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? I had/ have over 13 years in the military, and all of it went up in smoke with this one, although serious, infraction. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel from the United States Army Reserve.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009998

    Original file (AR20090009998.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003036

    Original file (AR20090003036.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007770

    Original file (AR20080007770.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The Applicant states, "I SERVED THREE YEARS HONORABLY WITHOUT BEING IN ANY TROUBLE. On 5 November 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of other than honorable conditions discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012691

    Original file (AR20110012691.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ???? By abusing illegal drugs, he knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013155

    Original file (AR20060013155.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007043

    Original file (AR20100007043.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 February 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense for use and possession of illegal drugs in that he tested positive for cocaine at a unit urinalysis (080104) and received an Article 15 for cocaine (080131), with an entry level separation, uncharacterized discharge. ...