ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023138
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023165
On 1 October 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 20 October 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 7 September 2010.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023194
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 090202 Discharge Received: Date: 090223 Chapter: 14-12c AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct (Serious Offense) RE: SPD: JKQ Unit/Location: E Company, 2nd Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division, Fort Hood, TX Time Lost: AWOL x 3 from (080709-080713) for 5 days, AWOL from (080902-080916) for 15 days, the applicant returned to his unit from both periods of AWOL. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023207
Applicant Name: ????? Although the applicant did not properly annotate the DD Form 149 requesting a review of his record for a possible upgrade of his discharge; he was given the benefit of this review as instructed in pertinent part (E.3.1.3.2) by Department of Defense Instruction 1332.28 which stipulates that a request for review from an applicant without an honorable discharge shall be treated as a request for a change to an honorable discharge unless the applicant requests a specific...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023232
Applicant Name: ????? They correct dates of AWOL are 070622-070730 as described in the supporting documents and in the applicants request for a Chapter 10 discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023238
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 January 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, abuse of illega drugs; in that he was punished by a Summary Court-Martial for using an illegal drug, missing formations and disobeying orders from superiorspattern of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023282
Applicant Name: ????? On 7 March 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023321
Applicant Name: ????? On 31 July 2007, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023364
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, paragraph 13-2f by reason of physical standards, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, paragraph 13-2f by reason of physical standards, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023407
Applicant Name: ????? I made some bad choices and still pay to this day and regret it all. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Chnage RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023411
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "I was discharged from reserve unit with honorable status. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of MBK (i.e., completion of required active service). Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023442
Applicant Name: ????? Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue of changing the narrative reason for discharge to medical disability; however, the narrative reason for separation is governed by specific directives. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: None Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 with a self-authored statement, VA disability documents and a DD Form 214.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023446
Applicant Name: ????? On 12 August 2010, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023453
The evidence of record indicates the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. After a thorough review of the applicants records, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023469
Applicant Name: ????? On 28 November 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-9, Section II, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct- conviction by a civil court in a foreign country, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, the issue and document submitted with the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023531
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023579
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with defense counsel, and voluntarily in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023586
Applicant Name: ????? On 3 June 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. This isolated incident of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of the applicant's service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023589
Applicant Name: ????? On 8 February 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023592
Applicant Name: ????? On 29 December 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023620
Applicant Name: ????? On 31 May 2002, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023638
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "I want to rejoin the Army to help my family and serve my country the way I should have the first time. The analyst noted the applicant's issue that his MOS was changed to a 92Y without any consideration or input from him; however, the analyst is unable to determine whether this contentions have merit because the appropriate documents are not in the available record and no evidence...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023655
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 January 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he went AWOL from (081005-081015), failed to go to his appointed place of duty x 2 (080923), (081003), failed to obey an order from a noncommissioned officer (080617), and broke restriction (080509). Board Action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023686
Applicant Name: ????? On 6 February 2001, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023692
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, the issue and document submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023695
Applicant Name: ????? On 25 June 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023699
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023705
Applicant Name: ????? On 8 December 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023780
Applicant Name: ????? On 27 April 1998, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023830
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 20 August 2010 and a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period of service ending 13 December 2000.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023834
Applicant Name: ????? On 11 March 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 19 April 2010, the applicant again consulted with legal counsel and waived consideration of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023851
Applicant Name: ????? Post Service Accomplishments: The applicant states, in his issue that he is employed with Johnstons Port-Muskogee and has been there for 3 1/2 + years. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 August 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he received a Field Grade Article 15 for using...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023878
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023892
On 5 May 2010, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 20 May 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023913
Applicant Name: ????? Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online application and DD Form 214 for the period of service under reviews. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: "Physical Standards" with the corresponding separation (SPD) code of "JFT" under provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023921
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 11 December 2007, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023940
On 3 August 2006 the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of personality disorder, after having been diagnosed by a competent medical authority, which was of such severity as to interfere with his being able to adequately serve in the U.S. Army; and for making threatening statements toward the company commander. The regulation also directs that commanders will not take action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023942
Applicant Name: ????? On 26 September 2001, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 4 January 2002, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023952
Applicant Name: ????? On 26 May 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023953
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 080310 Discharge Received: Date: 080409 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Company B, 2nd Battalion, 13th Infantry Regiment, Fort Jackson, SC Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (070126-080224) for 393 days. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial and the separation code is "KFS."
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023960
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he did on (040206) received an Article 15 for failing to obey the Battalion Policy Letter #10, received another Article 15 on (041027), for two specifications of damaging military property through neglect, the said damage being a value of about $16,196.00 and $...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023962
My unit returned to Ft Eustis in May, 2009 and the command initiated action on 21 May 2009, the day before my retirement, to rescind my medical retirement and further initiated action to discharge me under other than honorable conditions. The unit commander recommended separation from the Army with an under honorable conditions discharge and advised the applicant of his rights. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023969
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 080702 Discharge Received: Date: 080815 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: E Company, 2nd Battalion, 19th Infantry Regiment, Fort Benning, GA Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (080201-080526) for 116 days. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023997
Applicant Name: ????? On 10 October 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024048
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 September 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for being unable to meet the military standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of a lack of motivation and his inability to adapt to the military, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024092
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024148
Applicant Name: ????? On 27 February 2006, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board even though he was not entitled to a board and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024168
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, submitted a statement in his own behalf requesting that an administrative separation board hear his case, because he had over 6 years of active military service at the time of the initiation of the separation action. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: Misconduct (Serious Offense)...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024286
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 August 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for wrongfully using cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 23 August 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024289
Careful consideration was given to his entire service record, to include his prior service, and the analyst found that this service was not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an upgrade of the discharge under review. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and...