ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024290
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he has been separated from the Army for 4 years, and he is ready to continue with his life in a positive direction. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024353
Applicant Name: ????? On 22 October 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024428
Applicant Name: ????? The evidence of record shows that the applicant consulted with legal counsel and had over 6 years of total active and reserve military service at the time of initiation of separation action and was entitled to an administrative separation board. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: Secretarial Authority under the provisions of Chapter 5-3, AR 635-200, with a corresponding...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024457
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024465
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Each case is decided on its own merits when an applicant submits a DD Form 293 requesting a change in discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024477
Applicant Name: ????? In view of the foregoing, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024482
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024492
Further, the record does not support the applicants contention, and no evidence to support it has been submitted by the applicant, that the discharge was the result of any medical condition. However, the evidence of record contains a counseling statement from the first sergeant, dated 19 May 2004, which indicates that the unit commander ordered the test based on a witnessed drug use by the applicant. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024552
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024554
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 090805 Discharge Received: Date: 091103 Chapter: 13 AR: 635-200 Reason: Unsatisfactory Participation RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: Co B, 405th Combat Support Hospital, West Hartford, CT Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 August 2009, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024559
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 060909 Chapter: 14-12c (2) AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse) RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: 655th Transportation Company, 406th Corps Support Battalion, Base Camp Adder, Iraq Time Lost: The applicant was confined by the military authorities for 15 days as part of his punishment imposed from a Summary Court-Martial; however, the inclusive date is not in the file. The DD Form 214 indicates the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024566
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states "I did 7 years in the Army, enlisting in the Army while in high school. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024570
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024572
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, documents and the issues submitted, the analyst found no mitigating...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024724
Applicant Name: ????? On 29 September 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024726
Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2010/10/04 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. On 25 March 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024768
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 November 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-serious offense for being AWOL (060714-060906), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024806
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he received a Field Grade Article 15 on (041216 for failing a urinalysis on (041004), for wrongful use of marijuana, and then failed another urinalysis on (041102), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 4 March 2005, the separation authority...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024824
On 11 March 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 25 March 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024827
Applicant Name: ????? The analyst recommends that block 24, "Character of Service" be administratively corrected to "fully honorable" as approved by the separation approving authority. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: Correct block 24 "Character of Service" to "fully Honorable."
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024829
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024884
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 030422 Discharge Received: Date: 030502 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: E Company, 159th Aviation Brigade (Provisional), Fort Campbell, KY. Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (010321-030218) for 695 days. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024895
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-200, paragraph 5-8 by reason of parenthood, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024940
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 970506 Discharge Received: Date: 970611 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Service Battery, 1st Battalion, 82nd Field Artillery, 1st Cavalry Division, Fort Hood, TX Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (960830-970309) for 192 days. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024977
It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while consulting with his legal counsel prior to his separation from the Army was informed that there is no automatic upgrading or automatic review of a less than honorable discharge by any Government agency or the Army Board for the Correction of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025007
Applicant Name: ????? On 17 March 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025042
Applicant Name: ????? The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025054
Applicant Name: ????? While the applicant's misconduct is not condoned, the analyst determined that the overall length and quality of the applicant's service, to include her two tours of combat service in Iraq, the successful completion of her two day Army Substance Abuse classes and the unit commanders recommendation to retain the applicant in the Army mitigated the discrediting entry in the service record. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025124
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 080722 Discharge Received: Date: 080827 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Company C, 369th Signal Battalion, Fort Gordon, GA Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (070905-080624) for 292 days. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025127
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025130
Applicant Name: ????? On 23 November 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025185
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 January 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he was found guilty by a Summary Court-Martial for being AWOL from (070402-070813), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025222
Applicant Name: ????? On 17 April 2007, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", and the separation code is "JKK."
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025224
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025227
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 August 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition for being diagnosed by competent medical authority with bilateral foot pain, left ankle stress fracture, not resolving with conservative treatment for the past 5 weeks; which, she did not have prior to service. Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025237
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 December 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; in that he wrongfully used marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025381
Applicant Name: ????? A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. The analyst noted the applicant's issue requesting that his discharge be changed to general, under honorable conditions so that others will not question his characterization of service, based on information reflected on his DD Form 214.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025493
Applicant Name: ????? On 20 August 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 22 August 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025538
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he requests an upgrade of his discharge to fully honorable. On 25 October 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025603
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 7 November 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025612
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025634
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he requests an upgrade of his discharge to fully honorable, and a change to the narrative reason for separation, separation (SPD) code, and the reentry eligibility (RE) code. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025684
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025694
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. The applicant's DD...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025696
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025701
Applicant Name: ????? On 29 July 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025702
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 June 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct, for lying to an NCO (040907), consuming alcoholic beverages while under the age of 21 on two occasions (040120, 050117), and for breaking restriction (050120), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025708
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025712
Facts and Circumstances: On 16 February 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition for being diagnosed by competent medical authority with a bipolar disorder which was incompatible with military service and recommended the applicants discharge with an entry level uncharacterized separation of service. The applicants service was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025714
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 September 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he went AWOL for over thirty days, with a entry level uncharacterized discharge. The analyst noted the applicant's issue that his discharge was improper because it was less than 180 days of active service and he needs an...