Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023194
Original file (AR20100023194.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/09/09	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he would like another opportunity to show the military his commitment to them, his family and country.  He was previously discharged for going AWOL, because of fear of getting deployed overseas.  He further states that if he is given the chance to reenlist with a different MOS, he feels that he has matured to an understanding that will once again help him achieve his highest potential as a Soldier.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 090202
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 090223   Chapter: 14-12c       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Serious Offense)	   RE:     SPD: JKQ   Unit/Location: E Company, 2nd Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division, Fort Hood, TX 

Time Lost: AWOL x 3 from (080709-080713) for 5 days, AWOL from (080902-080916) for 15 days, the applicant returned to his unit from both periods of AWOL.  AWOL from (080923-081017) for 25 days, the applicant was apprehended by the civilian authorities. Civil confinement from (081018-090106) for 80 days. Total time lost was 125 days. 

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 090121, AWOL x 2 from (080902-080916), and AWOL from (080923-090106), reduction to Private (E-1), forfeiture of $699.00 pay per month for two months, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (090601), restriction and extra duty for 45 days (FG)

080919, AWOL x 1 from (080709-080713), reduction to Private (E-2), forfeiture of $352.00 pay, restriction and extra duty for 14 days (CG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  17
Current ENL Date: 070426    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  16 weeks/The applicant required a medical waiver at the time of enlistment, which was approved on (070412).
Current ENL Service: 	1 Yrs, 5 Mos, 27 Days ?????
Total Service:  		1 Yrs, 5 Mos, 27 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 21B10 Combat Engineer   GT: 96   EDU: GED Cert   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant. 



VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 2 February 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he had multiple absences without leave (AWOL's), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  On 2 February 2009, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. 
       
       The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On 2 February 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 
       
       The record contains a Military Police Report in reference to the applicant's offense of AWOL, dated 26 September 2008

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. 

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that if he is given the chance to reenlist with a different MOS, he feels that he has matured to an understanding that will once again help him achieve his highest potential as a Soldier.  The analyst found that the applicant met entrance qualification standards to include age.  The analyst further found no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.
       
       If the applicant desires to reenlist, he should contact the local recruiter to determine his eligibility to reenlist.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes. 
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 13 May 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 25 August 2010.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change

















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100023194
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090014498

    Original file (AR20090014498.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 214 for period under review. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010374

    Original file (AR20090010374.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 28 January 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he wrongfully and without authority wear upon his uniform the rank of Private (E-2), physically controll a vehicle while drunk, consummed alcohol while under the age of 21, failed to report on time to extra duty twice...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020251

    Original file (AR20090020251.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110021356

    Original file (AR20110021356.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011262

    Original file (AR20090011262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 April 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 24 April 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090014156

    Original file (AR20090014156.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 18 February 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022238

    Original file (AR20110022238.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 February 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, serious offense for receiving two DUIs (080713 and 090117), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 20 February 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003699

    Original file (AR20120003699.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 December 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense for going AWOL (081028-081103 and 080902-080909) stealing the cell phone of another Soldier, punching her in her jaw, and failure to report to his appointed place of duty on several occasions,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007594

    Original file (AR20090007594.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 August 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, for commission of serious offense in that he tested positive for marijuana on two different occasions, went AWOL on three different occasions, and failed to report to duty on three different occasions with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 18 August 2008,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023655

    Original file (AR20100023655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 January 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he went AWOL from (081005-081015), failed to go to his appointed place of duty x 2 (080923), (081003), failed to obey an order from a noncommissioned officer (080617), and broke restriction (080509). Board Action...