Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023960
Original file (AR20100023960.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/10/18	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states "To Who It may Concern, I would like my dicharge changed so I can become gainfully employed.  I would also like to add the my discharge was for artice 15's and I was not court martialed. 

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 050219   Chapter: 14-12b       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKA   Unit/Location: 226th Signal Company, 307th Signal Battalion, Korea, APO AP 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 040206, failing to obey a lawful order issued by a LTC on (031231), (the continuation sheet-DA Form 2627 is not in of the available record), forfeiture of $340.00 pay, extra duty and restriction for 14 days (CG)

041120, without proper authority, through neglect damaged by wrecking a HMMWV of a value of about $16,196.00, military property of the US on (040826), through neglect damaged by wrecking a Generator Set of a value of about $1,630.00, military property of the US on (040826), and unlawfully struck a SPC on (040906), reduction to Private (E-1), forfeiture of $621.00 pay per month for 2 months, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (050520), extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 021002    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	2 Yrs, 4 Mos, 18 Days ?????
Total Service:  		2 Yrs, 4 Mos, 18 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 25Q10 Multichannel Trans Sys Oper/Maint   GT: 101   EDU: GED Cert   Overseas: Korea (030515-050219)   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, KDSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.




VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he did on (040206) received an Article 15 for failing to obey the Battalion Policy Letter #10, received another Article 15 on (041027), for two specifications of damaging military property through neglect, the said damage being a value of about $16,196.00 and $ 1,630.00, and a third specification for assaulting a fellow Soldier.  Also, he received numerous negative counseling statements for various misconduct. 
       
       The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  
       
       The record contains a Military Police Report in reference to the applicant's offenses of; assault and aggravated assault using a glass bottle dated 6 September 2004. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he would like his dicharge changed so that  he can become gainfully employed.  In review of the applicant’s entire service record, the analyst found that this issue did not overcome the reason for discharge and the characterization of service granted.  Further, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities. 
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
       
       
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 10 June 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: Online application dated 12 October 2010.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change
















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100023960
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001878

    Original file (AR20070001878.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 11 Mos, 28 Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 21 September 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001878aC071031

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 13 February 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense (for disrespect toward an NCO and illegal use of marijuana), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100022924

    Original file (AR20100022924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001746

    Original file (AR20090001746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 29 January 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100009000

    Original file (AR20100009000.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 30 January 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009443

    Original file (AR20060009443.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 00 Mos, 13 Days ????? Also, the separation authority directing the issuance of a general, under honorable conditions discharge is not part of the available records and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008659

    Original file (AR20090008659.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003015

    Original file (AR20090003015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 February 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for receiving a Field Grade Article 15 for destroying property other than military x 3, assault on a fellow Soldier, and drunk and disorderly (040827); and a Company Grade Article 15 for adultery (030715); with an general,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020572

    Original file (AR20090020572.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Serious Offense) and the separation code is "JKQ." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003339

    Original file (AR20080003339.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...