Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023834
Original file (AR20100023834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/09/16	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he would like an upgrade of his discharge in order to receive his veterans benefits and medical care at the Fayetteville VA Medical Center.   

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 100311
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 100617   Chapter: 14-12c (2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: HQ & Support Company, 5th Psychological Operations Battalion (Airborne), Fort Bragg, NC 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 100120, wrongfully used marijuana between on or about (091107-091207), reduction to Private (E-1), forfeiture of $723.00 pay per month for 2 months, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (100719), extra duty and restriction for 30 days and an Oral Reprimand (FG)

091209, failed to go to his appointed place of duty x 3 (091116), (091117), (091123), reduction to Private First Class (E-3), suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (090207), forfeiture of $409.00 pay, extra duty and restriction for 14 days and an Oral Reprimand (CG)

The suspension of the punishment of reduction of Private First Class (E-3) and forfeiture of $409.00 pay imposed on (091209) was vacated, effective (091223) based on the applicant's offense of wrongfully possessing an unknown quantity of marijuana on (091216).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 070717    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	2 Yrs, 11 Mos, 1 Days ?????
Total Service:  		2 Yrs, 11 Mos, 1 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 91B10 Wheeled Vehicle Mech   GT: 92   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: GWOTSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.




VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 9 March 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he wrongfully used marijuana (091207), wrongfully possessed marijuana (091216), absence without leave x 3 (091209), failed to go to his appointed place of duty x 3 (091116), (091117), (091123), and resisted lawful apprehension by the military police.  The unit commander recommended separation with an under other than honorable discharge.  He was advised of his rights. 
       
       On 11 March 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  On 5 April 2010, the separation approving authority disapproved the conditional waiver and referred the applicant's case to an administrative separation board. 
       
       On 19 April 2010, the applicant again consulted with legal counsel and waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, to include a personal appearance before such a board.  On 23 April 2010, the separation authority approved the unconditional waiver and directed that the applicant be discharged with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.  

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he would like to receive his veterans benefits and medical care at the Fayetteville VA Medical Center.  Eligibility for veteran's benefits to include medical, and educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 20 May 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: na 

Exhibits Submitted: dd Form 293 dated 7 September 2010.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change

















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100023834
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005943

    Original file (AR20130005943.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 October 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did not submit a statement on his behalf. In an undated memorandum, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver request, waived further rehabilitation and directed...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110020093

    Original file (AR20110020093.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 16 December 2010, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130014052

    Original file (AR20130014052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 5 February 2010 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial, AR 635-200 Chapter 10, KFS, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: A Co, 2-8 Inf Bn, 2nd BCT, 4ID, Fort Carson CO f. Enlistment Date/Term: 6 March 2007, 4 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 2 years, 8 months, 25 days h. Total Service: 2...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100010074

    Original file (AR20100010074.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 December 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition, not a disability for being diagnosed by competent medical authority with depression on (091123), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110005158

    Original file (AR20110005158.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 February 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; in that he abused illegal drugs and received multiple charges for drinking while under the legal age of 21, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 5 April 2010, the separation authority waived...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100016889

    Original file (AR20100016889.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 June 2009, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100016552

    Original file (AR20100016552.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 August 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he failed to report for duty on (070526), AWOL from (070526-070529), wrongfully consumed alcohol under the age of 21 and did not attend a motorcycle riders safety course and obtain a valid motorcycle drivers license, with a...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028449

    Original file (AR20100028449.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 January 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(1), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct in the he tested positive for marijuana (091008 and 091104), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. However, in review of the applicant’s entire service record, the analyst found that these accomplishments did...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015886

    Original file (AR20110015886.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024825

    Original file (AR20110024825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 February 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for receiving numerous Article 15s for misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 24 February 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge...