Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023364
Original file (AR20100023364.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/09/08	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that his discharge is improper because he was not tested the right way for the PT test.  It was given to soon of each other for him to prepare for the next one.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 021125   Chapter: 13-2f       AR: 635-200
Reason: Physical Standards	   RE:     SPD: JFT   Unit/Location: B Battery, 1st Battalion, 3rd AD, Fort Stewart, GA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  17
Current ENL Date: 000607    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	2 Yrs, 5 Mos, 19 Days ?????
Total Service:  		2 Yrs, 5 Mos, 19 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-2		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 14R10 LOS-F-H Crewmember   GT: 97   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the discharge from the Army.  However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  
       
       The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, paragraph 13-2f by reason of physical standards, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  
       
       Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JFT (i.e., physical standards) with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3."  On 15 November 2002, DA, HQ, 3rd Infantry Division (Mechanized) ort Stewart, GA, issued Orders 319-0020 discharging the applicant from the Regular Army, with an effective date of: 25 November 2002. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the requirements and procedures for administrative discharge of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 13-2e of this regulation, states in pertinent part, that separation proceedings will be initiated for Soldiers without medical limitations who have two consecutive failures of the Army Physical Fitness Test.  The reason for discharge will be shown as physical standards.  Service of Soldiers separated because of unsatisfactory performance for failure of the Army Physical Fitness Test will be characterized as honorable or general, under honorable conditions.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records, the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge.  
       
       The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the applicant's discharge from the Army.  However, the applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.  
       
       The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, paragraph 13-2f by reason of physical standards, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  
       
       The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, the analyst is unable to determine whether these contentions have merit because the facts and circumstances leading to the discharge are unknown.  The burden of proof remains with the applicant to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration.  If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will still be his responsibility to meet the burden of proof since the evidence is not available in the official record.
       
       Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 13 May 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 1 September 2010.






VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change





























Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100023364
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000751

    Original file (AR20120000751.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214, indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13-2f, AR 635-200, by reason of physical standards, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: ?????

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000046

    Original file (AR20100000046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13-2f, AR 635-200, by reason of physical standards, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 14 December 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110002231

    Original file (AR20110002231.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 October 1996, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, paragraph 13-2f, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for failing three consecutive Army Physical Fitness Tests (APFTs), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Yes No Counsel: [ redacted ] Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated (110126); IDVA Form...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008012

    Original file (AR20080008012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    I received my Discharge papers a few weeks later and I seen that I had been discharged “General, Under Honorable Conditions”. I was in the military a total of nine years and six months, and in that time I failed two consecutive Physical Training test not more than forty-five days apart. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014296

    Original file (AR20100014296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "I received a Chapter 5, AR 635-200, and Chapter 13 for unsatisfactory performance with characterization of service, General under Honorable, for being unable to pass the physical fitness test. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010825

    Original file (AR20080010825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 October 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for consecutive failures of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. Service of Soldiers separated because of unsatisfactory performance for failure of the Army Physical Fitness...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100015993

    Original file (AR20100015993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, paragraph 13-2e by reason of physical standards, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 14 May 2010 and a DD Form 149 dated 14 May 2010.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006382

    Original file (AR20090006382.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 April 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for failure to meet the minimum standards on two consecutive record Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) (061031) and (070509), the characterization of service is not in the file. The analyst noted that on the applicant's DD Form 214 block 24, "Character of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100017846

    Original file (AR20100017846.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 March 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for failing eight consecutive Army Physical Fitness Tests with an honorable discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: "Physical...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080018397

    Original file (AR20080018397.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application Receipt Date: 2008/11/13 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 submitted by the Applicant in which Applicant states, "Current job requires a security clearance for advancement, current employer requires personell to have an honorable discharge and nothing less." Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable and...