ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709653C070209
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: On 14 June 1967 the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years at the age of 17. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: 1.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709657
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709657C070209
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709665
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The record also contains...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709665C070209
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD). The record also contains documented evidence that on 30 May 1974 the applicant voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of chapter 10 of AR 635-200. Chapter 10 of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709670
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709670C070209
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD). EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: On 7 May 1963 the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States for 2 years at the age of 18. The conviction by civil authorities,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709683
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709683C070209
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board considered the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709685
On 14 November 1978, the applicant accepted NJP under Article 15, UCMJ for failing to go to his appointed place of duty and for disobeying a lawful order. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. A general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions of an individual whose military record is not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709685C070209
On 26 March 1979, the applicants commander initiated separation proceedings under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 5-31, Expeditious Discharge Program. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. A general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions of an individual whose military record is not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709686
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant’s military records are not available. He had no prior record of any disciplinary actions. On 25 June 1954, the U.S. Army Board of Review affirmed the sentence.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709686C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his dishonorable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. He had no prior record of any disciplinary actions. On 25 June 1954, the U.S. Army Board of Review affirmed the sentence.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709691
His bad conduct discharge was effective 25 March 1959. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The applicant’s contention that his desertion periods were the result of serious medical problems is not supported by any evidence in available records nor furnished by the applicant.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709691C070209
His bad conduct discharge was effective 25 March 1959. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: 1. In particular it is noted that the applicant had two periods of desertion, the second longer than the first.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709694
He was sentenced to receive a bad conduct discharge, to forfeit all pay and allowances, and to confinement at hard labor for 3 months. He regained his memory in the Temple City Jail on 5 July 1953. On 6 August 1953, the applicant was released from the Army with a bad conduct discharge
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709694C070209
On 23 July 1953, the suspended sentence was vacated. On 6 August 1953, the applicant was released from the Army with a bad conduct discharge There is no evidence that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board when it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709699
On 2 March 1983 the applicant entered a rehabilitation program for drug abuse at the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) at Fort Lewis. On 25 October 1983 the applicant acknowledged that he had been recommended for separation due to controlled substance abuse rehabilitation failure. On 12 July 1985 the Army responded to the Assistant Secretary and reported that 76,314 positive urinalysis specimens were reviewed, and a total of 46,032 notification letters were...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709699C070209
On 2 March 1983 the applicant entered a rehabilitation program for drug abuse at the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) at Fort Lewis. On 25 October 1983 the applicant acknowledged that he had been recommended for separation due to controlled substance abuse rehabilitation failure. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION Loren G. Harrell Director INDEX CASE...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709707
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709707C070209
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to a general/under honorable conditions discharge (GD). Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709717
APPLICANT REQUESTS : In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge and that his “good” service time be shown on his discharge papers. On 19 October 1955, the applicant completed a separation physical and was found qualified for separation. On 20 October 1955, the applicant was discharged in the pay grade of E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-638 for unfitness - traits of character rendering retention in the Service undesirable.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709717C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge and that his good service time be shown on his discharge papers. On 19 October 1955, the applicant completed a separation physical and was found qualified for separation. On 20 October 1955, the applicant was discharged in the pay grade of E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-638 for unfitness - traits of character rendering retention in the Service undesirable.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709728
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show that he enlisted for a term of 3 years. Based on the evidence of record, it appears that it was the applicant’s intent to enlist in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years. RECOMMENDATION :That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the DD Form 4/3 to show that he enlisted for 3 years.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709728C070209
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show that he enlisted for a term of 3 years. His Form 4/3 shows that he enlisted for 3 years and 22 weeks. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the DD Form 4/3 to show that he enlisted for 3 years.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709729
At the time he submitted his application he was serving in pay grade E-3. However, paragraph 2-20e of the cited regulation requires 30 or more semester hours for enlistment in pay grade E-2. Even if the applicant had enough credit hours to qualify for enlistment at a higher pay grade, it would only have been effective the day he presented it to his unit commander.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709729C070209
However, paragraph 2-20e of the cited regulation requires 30 or more semester hours for enlistment in pay grade E-2. As provided by the relevant regulation, the applicant would have been eligible for enlistment at a higher pay grade had he successfully completed 30 or more semester hours. Even if the applicant had enough credit hours to qualify for enlistment at a higher pay grade, it would only have been effective the day he presented it to his unit commander.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709731
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show that he enlisted for a term of 3 years vice 8 years. Based on the evidence of record, it appears that it was the applicant’s intent to enlist in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years. RECOMMENDATION :That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the DD Form 4/3 to show that he enlisted for 3 years.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709731C070209
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show that he enlisted for a term of 3 years vice 8 years. His DD Form 4/3 shows that he enlisted for 8 years. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the DD Form 4/3 to show that he enlisted for 3 years.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709733
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show that he enlisted for a term of 4 years vice 8 years. His DD Form 4/3 shows that he enlisted for 8 years. RECOMMENDATION :That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the DD Form 4/3 to show that he enlisted for 4 years.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709733C070209
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show that he enlisted for a term of 4 years vice 8 years. His DD Form 4/3 shows that he enlisted for 8 years. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the DD Form 4/3 to show that he enlisted for 4 years.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709734
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he enlisted for a term of 5 years vice 8 years. All related documents correctly show enlistment for 5 years. RECOMMENDATION :That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the DD Form 4/1 to show that the individual concerned enlisted for 5 years on 27 August 1997.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709734C070209
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he enlisted for a term of 5 years vice 8 years. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 August 1997 for 8 years. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the DD Form 4/1 to show that the individual concerned enlisted for 5 years on 27 August 1997.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709735
The applicant, in his application dated 4 September 1997, states that he was advanced to pay grade E-4 while a member of the Michigan Army National Guard (MIARNG), so he should have been enlisted in the higher pay grade. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 September 1997 in pay grade E-3. As the applicant’s advancement was unknown at the time of his enlistment, PERSCOM recommended correcting his records to show that he was promoted to pay grade E-4 effective 4 September 1997, the date he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709735C070209
The applicant, in his application dated 4 September 1997, states that he was advanced to pay grade E-4 while a member of the Michigan Army National Guard (MIARNG), so he should have been enlisted in the higher pay grade. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 September 1997 in pay grade E-3. As the applicants advancement was unknown at the time of his enlistment, PERSCOM recommended correcting his records to show that he was promoted to pay grade E-4 effective 4 September 1997, the date he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709737
However, his DD Form 4/1 shows that he enlisted on 28 July 1997. PERSCOM recommended approval of the applicant’s request by amending his DD Form 4/1 to show that he enlisted on 9 September 1997. RECOMMENDATION :That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the DD Form 4/1, item 5, dated 28 July 1997 to show that he enlisted on 9 September 1997.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709737C070209
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show that he enlisted on 9 September 1997 vice 28 July 1997. However, his DD Form 4/1 shows that he enlisted on 28 July 1997. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the DD Form 4/1, item 5, dated 28 July 1997 to show that he enlisted on 9 September 1997.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709738
He was reinstated to the April 1993 selection list, and would be promoted upon successful completion of ANCOC with a date of rank and effective date the date of his graduation from ANCOC. On 11 March 1997 the applicant was again conditionally promoted to Sergeant First Class, effective and with a date of rank of 1 February 1997. That official stated that the applicant could not fully document his failure to attend ANCOC, because he did not pass the physical training test; however, he gave...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709738C070209
He was reinstated to the April 1993 selection list, and would be promoted upon successful completion of ANCOC with a date of rank and effective date the date of his graduation from ANCOC. On 11 March 1997 the applicant was again conditionally promoted to Sergeant First Class, effective and with a date of rank of 1 February 1997. An official of that command stated that the applicant was promoted to Sergeant First Class effective 27 February 1997 upon successful completion of ANCOC.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709739
APPLICANT REQUESTS : Correction of his military records by adding his new social security number (SSN), and then referring his file to a Stand-by Advisory Board (STAB). In an advisory opinion to the Board (COPY ATTACHED), the Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center (EREC) advised that EREC has corrected the SSN in the applicant’s record. Notwithstanding EREC’s recommendation, there is no evidence, either of record or presented by the applicant, that material error or injustice occurred that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709739C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records by adding his new social security number (SSN), and then referring his file to a Stand-by Advisory Board (STAB). As his records may have contained either SSN he feels that his corrected records should go before a STAB for possible promotion. In an advisory opinion to the Board (COPY ATTACHED), the Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center (EREC) advised that EREC has corrected the SSN in the applicants record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709752
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. At the time the MOR was imposed, the applicant was no longer assigned to the Recruiting Command and there is no evidence in the available records to show that the MOR was actually referred to the applicant for rebuttal or comment. Not only was the applicant not under the command of the imposing officer at the time the MOR was issued (had departed 5 months prior), there is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709755
APPLICANT REQUESTS : That his date of rank for promotion to pay grade E-6 be changed from 1 July 1997 to 1 June 1997. In an advisory opinion to the Board (COPY ATTACHED), the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) advised, in effect, that Army Regulation 600-8-19 provides that soldiers are eligible for promotion to pay grade E-6 against monthly promotion scores. Based on the evidence of record, the applicant’s promotion point score of 688 was inputted into the system in April 1997, making...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709755C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his date of rank for promotion to pay grade E-6 be changed from 1 July 1997 to 1 June 1997. For the applicant to have been promoted to pay grade E-6 effective 1 June 1997, his promotion point score of 688 had to be in the system by March 1997. Based on the evidence of record, the applicants promotion point score of 688 was inputted into the system in April 1997, making him eligible for promotion to pay grade E-6 on 1 July 1997.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709756
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The evidence of record...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709756C070209
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board considered the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709770
APPLICANT REQUESTS : Release from the Retired Reserve and assignment to an active Reserve unit. In effect, the applicant is requesting that the Board assist him in finding an USAR Reserve unit APPLICANT STATES : When his reserve unit underwent a reorganization, his food service warrant officer position was phased out. He feels that his unit or other active Reserve units need a food service warrant position.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709770C070209
In effect, the applicant is requesting that the Board assist him in finding an USAR Reserve unit APPLICANT STATES: When his reserve unit underwent a reorganization, his food service warrant officer position was phased out. He feels that his unit or other active Reserve units need a food service warrant position. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709777
Three of the individuals provided statements to the CID which implicated the applicant. However, this Board also notes that the applicant had a very good record prior to the charges that led to his discharge and apparently continued to work well during the time his case was pending disposition. It notes that the primary accuser was overheard “confessing” she had falsely accused the applicant of these charges.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709777C070209
Three of the individuals provided statements to the CID which implicated the applicant. It notes that the primary accuser was overheard confessing she had falsely accused the applicant of these charges. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing: a. that the individual concerned was given an honorable discharge from the Army on 18 December 1996, under the provisions of Chapter 14, Army Regulation 635-200, for misconduct; b. that the...