Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709729C070209
Original file (9709729C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  The applicant requests, in effect,  correction of his military records to show that he enlisted in pay grade E-2.

APPLICANT STATES:  When he enlisted he was unaware that by presenting his college transcripts he could enlist at a higher pay grade.  In support of his application he submits a copy of his transcripts from Arizona Institute of Business and Technology which shows that he earned 26 credit hours.  

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 July 1996 for 4 years in pay grade E-1.  At the time he submitted his application he was serving in pay grade E-3.

In an advisory opinion to the Board (COPY ATTACHED), the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), advised that in accordance with Army Regulation 601-210, paragraph 2-201(5), soldiers who lack documentation at the time of enlistment will be promoted only on the date they provide that information to the unit commander.  The applicant enlisted with 28 (sic) semester hours from an accredited institution. However, paragraph 2-20e of the cited regulation requires 30 or more semester hours for enlistment in pay grade E-2.  PERSCOM recommended denial of the application.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded:

1.  As provided by the relevant regulation, the applicant would have been eligible for enlistment at a higher pay grade had he successfully completed 30 or more semester hours.  The college transcripts provided shows successful completion of only 26 credit hours.

2.  Even if the applicant had enough credit hours to qualify for enlistment at a higher pay grade, it would only have been effective the day he presented it to his unit commander.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709729

    Original file (9709729.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time he submitted his application he was serving in pay grade E-3. However, paragraph 2-20e of the cited regulation requires 30 or more semester hours for enlistment in pay grade E-2. Even if the applicant had enough credit hours to qualify for enlistment at a higher pay grade, it would only have been effective the day he presented it to his unit commander.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076037C070215

    Original file (2002076037C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. PERSCOM stated that a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710070

    Original file (9710070.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    PERSCOM recommended correcting her records to show that she was promoted to pay grade E-2 effective 18 August 1997, the date she submitted her application to the Board. Paragraph 2-20f of the cited regulation provides for enlistment in pay grade E-3 upon completion of 60 or more credit hours. The applicant would have only been eligible for enlistment in pay grade E-3 had she successfully completed 60 or more semester hours.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710070C070209

    Original file (9710070C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    In an advisory opinion to the Board (COPY ATTACHED), the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), advised, in effect, that in accordance with Army Regulation 601-210, paragraph 2-20l(5), soldiers who lack documentation at the time of enlistment will be promoted only on the date they provide that information to the unit commander. PERSCOM recommended correcting her records to show that she was promoted to pay grade E-2 effective 18 August 1997, the date she submitted her application to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610703C070209

    Original file (9610703C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In effect, the applicant requests that her military records be corrected to show that she was enlisted in the Army Reserve on 12 March 1996 in pay grade E-2 or higher. The applicant states she enlisted in the Regular Army from the delayed entry program on 22 April 1996, and during her initial processing for enlistment in the Army Reserve, she provided a diploma and certificate showing that she had 72 college credits, believing her enlisted grade would be E-2 or E-3. The applicant did not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610769C070209

    Original file (9610769C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, the applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show that he was enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 February 1996 in pay grade E-3. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: The applicant enlisted in the Army in pay grade E-1 on 2 February 1996. The applicant submitted a copy of two college transcripts with his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609631C070209

    Original file (9609631C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-20f states, in effect, that an applicant who has successfully completed 60 or more classroom semester hours of an accredited college or university will be enlisted in pay grade E-3. The applicant should have been promoted to pay grade E-3 on 16 June 1995, the date she entered basic training, under the provisions of Army Regulation 601-210, paragraph 2-20l. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081743C070215

    Original file (2002081743C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted in the Army Reserve on 12 October 2001 for a period of 8 years, in the pay grade of E-1. The applicant's DD Form 1966/1 (Record of Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States) shows she enlisted in the DEP on 12 October 2001 in the pay grade of E-1. PERSCOM stated that a review of the records indicated that the applicant enlisted on 3 January 2002 in the pay grade of E-1.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140012915

    Original file (AR20140012915.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military record to show a pay grade higher than E-1 at the time of his entry on active duty. The applicant's Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), in Section VII (Civilian Education) contains an entry which states he completed 3 years of college (60 or more semester hours) in 2010; however, his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) is void of any record of college transcripts, and there is no indication in his OMPF as to when transcripts may...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008656

    Original file (20080008656.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He had completed 101 credit hours which entitled him to enlist in pay grade E-3. The applicant was entitled to submit documentation to his personnel officer within 6 months of his enlistment for advancement to a higher pay grade than E-3; however, there is no evidence and the applicant has provided none, to show that he did so.