APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his dishonorable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that prior to the incident he had never been in any trouble in his entire life. He served two years in prison for tire theft, which he admitted. He knows this was wrong and he apologizes. For 43 years hes endured the burden of a dishonorable discharge as a Black man in the Army in 1952. He feels the punishment did not fit the crime. His mother is 90 years old and he is 63. Before either one dies, they would like to see him eligible for an American flag to be draped over his casket. He provides letters of support from his brother, a retired Air Force Master Sergeant, and two cousins. The Memorandum of Consideration is not available and the case is reviewed de novo.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicants military records are not available. The information contained herein was obtained from alternate sources:
He enlisted in the Army on 29 May 1952.
He had no prior record of any disciplinary actions.
In a sworn statement made 5 April 1954, the applicant stated he was in a jeep with two of the defendants when one of them sold the jeeps spare tire to a German for Deutschmark 35. Soon thereafter he asked the other defendant Where is my cut? and took Deutschmark 5.
On 19 May 1954, the applicant pleaded guilty to and was convicted by, in a joint trial with three other defendants, a general-court martial of theft of four tires, tubes and wheels; wrongful appropriation of a 2 ½ ton truck; and selling without proper authority three tires, tubes and wheels. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, to confinement at hard labor for 2 years and to a forfeiture of all pay and allowances (maximum possible confinement time was 13 years). This was a lesser sentence than that given two of the other defendants.
On 25 June 1954, the U.S. Army Board of Review affirmed the sentence.
On 26 August 1954, the U.S. Court of Military Appeals determined the applicant was not entitled to a grant of review.
On 30 September 1954, the applicant was discharged, with a dishonorable discharge, pursuant to his court-martial sentence.
On 17 April 1961, this Board denied the applicants request for an upgrade.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, as amended, precludes any action by this Board which would disturb the finality of a court-martial conviction.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.
2. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations. The applicants good previous record was considered in his sentencing. The discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicants request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
Loren G. Harrell
Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709686
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant’s military records are not available. He had no prior record of any disciplinary actions. On 25 June 1954, the U.S. Army Board of Review affirmed the sentence.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006315
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065427C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020642
The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, Subject: Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, U.S. Code, provides policy guidance for Service Discharge Review Boards (DRBs) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NRs) to follow when taking action on applications from former service members discharged under DADT...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019610
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 615-364, in effect at the time, stated an enlisted person would be dishonorably discharged pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general court-martial imposing dishonorable discharge. His conviction and sentence by general court-martial were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000777
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 September 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140000777 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence of record shows that during the period of service under review the applicant was AWOL for more than 1 year and 6 months, he had two prior convictions by court-martial, and he was convicted by general court-martial and issued a bad conduct discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075192C070403
On 22 March 1955, at Camp Schimmelpfennig, Honshu, Japan, APO 201, the applicant pled guilty and was found guilty by a general court-martial for willfully disobeying a lawful order from his superior NCO to shovel snow. On 26 April 1955, the sentence was approved as adjudged, except that, in accordance with the pre-trial agreement, confinement at hard labor was reduced to 1 year. After a thorough review of the applicant’s record and any issues submitted, the Board found no cause for clemency.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607857C070209
He was convicted by three summary courts-martial, one special court-martial, and one general court-martial. All of his convictions appear to have been for different offenses. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION Loren G. Harrell Director INDEX CASE ID AR1998012413 SUFFIX RECON DATE BOARDED 1999/02/18 TYPE OF DISCHARGE BCD DATE OF DISCHARGE 1954/11/18 DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR615-364 DISCHARGE...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027641
The applicant's military records are not available for review. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Republic of Korea War Service Medal is awarded to members of the U.S. Armed Forces who served in Korea and adjacent waters between 25 June 1950 and 27 July 1953. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605588C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his dishonorable discharge be upgraded. He was found guilty of both charges and sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, 3 years confinement at hard labor and a total forfeiture of pay and allowances. The Board notes his contention of good post-service conduct; however, his record as compiled by the FBI indicates arrests since his separation from military service.