APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his date of rank for promotion to pay grade E-6 be changed from 1 July 1997 to 1 June 1997.
APPLICANT STATES: That he made the cutoff scores for promotion to pay grade E-6 for 1 June 1997, however, his name did not appear on the promotion selection list. Since he also met the promotion cut off score of 1 July 1997, he was promoted on that date.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 April 1990 and has remained on active duty thru continuous reenlist- ments.
In an advisory opinion to the Board (COPY ATTACHED), the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) advised, in effect, that Army Regulation 600-8-19 provides that soldiers are eligible for promotion to pay grade E-6 against monthly promotion scores. Those scores become effective the first day of the third month following the selection month. The applicants promotion points of 688 was inputted into the system in April 1997. Therefore, the applicant became eligible for promotion 3 months later, when he met the promotion cut off score for 1 July 1997. PERSCOM recommended denial of the applicants request.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded:
1. For the applicant to have been promoted to pay grade E-6 effective 1 June 1997, his promotion point score of 688 had to be in the system by March 1997. He has not provided any documentation that this was the case.
2. Based on the evidence of record, the applicants promotion point score of 688 was inputted into the system in April 1997, making him eligible for promotion to pay grade E-6 on 1 July 1997.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicants request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
Karl F. Schneider
Acting Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709755
APPLICANT REQUESTS : That his date of rank for promotion to pay grade E-6 be changed from 1 July 1997 to 1 June 1997. In an advisory opinion to the Board (COPY ATTACHED), the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) advised, in effect, that Army Regulation 600-8-19 provides that soldiers are eligible for promotion to pay grade E-6 against monthly promotion scores. Based on the evidence of record, the applicant’s promotion point score of 688 was inputted into the system in April 1997, making...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710074C070209
APPLICANT STATES: That had the Personnel Services Battalion (PSB) properly credited his DD 3355 (Promotion Point Worksheet), with 10 points for educational improvement, he would have met the promotion cut off score for 1 March 1997. An initial DA Form 3355, dated 6 November 1996 awarded the applicant 728 promotion points. In an advisory opinion to the Board (COPY ATTACHED), the Total Army Personal Command (PERSCOM) advised that Army policy provides that the addition of points not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710074
APPLICANT STATES : That had the Personnel Services Battalion (PSB) properly credited his DD 3355 (Promotion Point Worksheet), with 10 points for educational improvement, he would have met the promotion cut off score for 1 March 1997. An initial DA Form 3355, dated 6 November 1996 awarded the applicant 728 promotion points. In an advisory opinion to the Board (COPY ATTACHED), the Total Army Personal Command (PERSCOM) advised that Army policy provides that the addition of points not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013316
The applicant's military personnel records show that he enlisted in the United States Army Reserve for a period of 8 years on 23 December 1983. The Court dismissed the applicants claim insofar as he requested that the Court order his retroactive promotion because the Court does not have jurisdiction to review and order military promotion decisions. The period of time (i.e., 3 months) from initial computation and/or recomputation of promotion points to the effective date of promotion point...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066582C070402
This office recommended that the applicant’s request to adjust his date of rank and effective date for promotion to SSG from 7 September 2000 to 1 June 1999, be denied. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded: The applicant was conditionally promoted to the rank of SSG/pay grade E-6 with a date of rank and effective date...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710531C070209
The applicant requests, in effect, retroactive reevaluation of his promotion points and promotion to pay grade E-5 effective 1 September 1997. He was granted 575 promotion points on his July 1997 DA Form 3355. Had the PSNCO timely processed the promotion paperwork in June 1997 the applicant would have met the promotion point cut-off score for promotion to pay grade E-5 for 1 September 1997.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710531
He was granted 575 promotion points on his July 1997 DA Form 3355. The Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) in a comment to the Board advised, in effect, that their review of the case confirms the applicant’s contentions and recommended granting the applicant’s request. Had the PSNCO timely processed the promotion paperwork in June 1997 the applicant would have met the promotion point cut-off score for promotion to pay grade E-5 for 1 September 1997.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711009
The applicant requests, in effect, retroactive promotion to pay grade E-5 effective 1 April 1997 and adjustment of his selective reenlistment bonus (SRB). His DA Form 3355, dated 1 January 1997 awarded the applicant 465 promotion points. Apparently, during a subsequent review, it was determined that the applicant’s DA Form 3355 was not accompanied with the proper paperwork to support the promotion points awarded for ranger training and the Ranger Tab and he in fact did not meet the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711760
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant’s military records show that he received a promotion points reevaluation in July 1996 which changed his promotion points from 639 to 635 promotion points. Consequently, the applicant was denied promotion to the pay grade of E-6 on 1 December 1996.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015805
He states: * he wasnt promoted in a timely manner due to administrative errors * he made cut-off promotion points score of 350 on 8 August 1999, 1 October 2007, and 1 January 2009 in MOS 92Y (Unit Supply Specialist) * his Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) shows his promotion points was 350 on 8 August 1999 * Installation Management Command (IMCOM) reviewed his records and didnt see any flags, adverse actions or a promotion bar 3. His service record does not indicate he was recommended for...