APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to honorable.

APPLICANT STATES:  In effect, that he has paid for the mistakes which lead to his discharge and submits more than 40 letters from family members and friends attesting to his character.  He notes he never intended to desert the Army but left on both occasions because of extreme pressures and stress which were causing him to experience severe nervous problems.  He regrets accepting the plea bargain which lead to his discharge and has “always known that [he] made a terrible mistake doing that, because [he] did not desert the Army.”  He states he “went absent without leave with full intent to go back.”

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  With the exception of some finance records, the applicant’s military records are not available. However, information reconstructed from his 1958 court-martial shows:

He enlisted on 6 April 1954 at the age of 18 and was discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment in June 1956.  

In January 1958, while at Fort Hood, Texas the applicant departed AWOL “because his request for a transfer was denied.”  He was apprehended in April 1958, returned to military control and court-martialed.

On 18 June 1958, while at Fort Lewis, Washington, he again departed AWOL.  He was apprehended by civilian authorities on 11 November 1958.

During his general court-martial, which took place in December 1958, the applicant noted “he had no particular reason for committing the instant offense” and that he had “no particular desire to return to duty because he [was] anxious to marry his fiancee….”  He also noted, however, that he realized the foolishness of his conduct and was confident he could “soldier effectively” if he were restored to duty.  As a result of the court-martial the applicant was ultimately sentenced to a bad conduct discharge, 9 months confinement at hard labor, and total forfeiture of pay and allowances.

His bad conduct discharge was effective 25 March 1959.

The Manual for courts-martial, then in effect, Table of Maximum Punishments authorized dishonorable discharge, confinement for 3 years, and total forfeitures for the offense of desertion.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1.  Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offense charge.  Conviction and discharge were effected n accordance with applicable laws and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.  In particular it is noted that the applicant had two periods of desertion, the second longer than the first.

2.  The applicant’s contention that his desertion periods were the result of serious medical problems is not supported by any evidence in available records nor furnished by the applicant.  The applicant’s nearly four years of successful service before his first period of desertion demonstrated his ability for honorable service.

3.  Although his post-service accomplishments are noted they do not outweigh the seriousness of the offense and do not provide an adequate basis upon which the Board would grant relief.  These factors do, however, demonstrate his capacity for proper behavior.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE;

_______	______	______  Grant__________

_______	______	______  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_______	______	______  DENY APPLICATION

						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director