AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01227
It is unclear why no medical documentation was provided or why the case was not completed. In this case, he is not eligible for active duty orders. We note that the Air Force offices of primary responsibility state the applicants medical condition was not found to be in the line of duty; therefore no eligibility for active duty orders or pay exists.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01228
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01228 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect his active duty service commitment (ADSC) date as of December 2009 when he originally submitted his Post-9/11 GI Bill transfer of educational benefits (TEB) request. The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01237
In an undated letter the applicant states that he has had numerous positive accomplishments after his discharge from the Air Force. The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: While JAJM states his application is untimely, the changes in his life over the last 13 years show a greater impact, than if he filed within three 3 years. We considered upgrading the discharge on the basis...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01241
Since his discharge from the Air Force 33 years ago, he has been a decent law-abiding citizen. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the characterization of the applicants discharge based on clemency; however, after considering his overall record of service, the infractions which led to his administrative separation and lack of post-service documentation, we are not persuaded that an upgrade is warranted. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 7 Nov 13 Exhibit D. Email,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01250
Completion of the RTDP does not guarantee return to duty, it only requires airmen returned to duty be allowed to serve at least one year before separation. While the applicant successfully completed the RTDP, there was no error or injustice in her case. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of actionable material error or injustice; that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01260
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01260 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He notes that because the operation was top...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01266
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01266 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect the following: a. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01274
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01274 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be changed to honorable. For a full list of the offenses, see the commanders notification letter at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01278
The applicants DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to reflect the correct RE code of 2C unless otherwise directed by the Board. We also note the RE code the applicant received at separation was technically incorrect and his records will be administratively corrected to reflect the RE code 2C, which accurately reflects he received an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01278 was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01292
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01292 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He would like his discharge upgraded based on his military personnel file and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01294
On his last duty day, his commander issued him an Article 15 without any warning. On 17 Aug 98, the applicants commander issued him nonjudicial punishment under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCJM) for being absent from his place of duty without authority in violation of UCMJ Article 86 from on about 2 Jul 98 through on or about 23 Jul 98. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01297
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 May 13...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01309
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The lack of information on this program at the time of his retirement caused an injustice. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends granting the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01337
_______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He converted his military time to civil service time for the purpose of drawing civil service retirement pay and will not receive military retired pay. In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of SF Form 310, Federal Employee Retirement System Retirement Application, letter from spouse declining SBP, a personal statement and various other documents associated with his request. We took...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01347
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01347 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be amended to show she was awarded the Good Conduct Medal. The Good Conduct Medal is awarded to enlisted members who have honorably completed three continuous years...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01348
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01348 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)," be changed to 1XY [sic] to allow his reentry into the military. On 16...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01354
A1Y states that the applicant did not apply for the transfer of benefits via the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) system and there is no application on file. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01359
The AFCAM may be awarded for qualifying service from Sept. 11, 2001 to a date to be determined. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial stating the applicant has not exhausted all administrative avenues for award of the AFCAM; the applicant may request...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01364
Subsequent to the file being found legally sufficient, the discharge authority approved the request for discharge and directed the applicant be discharged with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. Furthermore, we do not find clemency is appropriate in this case since the applicant has not provided any evidence concerning his post- service activities. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 27 March 2012
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01367
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01367 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge. He was sentenced to a BCD, confinement for 16 months, and reduction in grade to airman basic. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01371
AFBCMR BC-2013-01371 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01379
Due to the delay in receiving guidance from his servicing Force Support Squadron, he spent 16 days of leave, from 8 Mar 12 through 23 Mar 12, that should be restored. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01386
He read in the Air Force Times that individuals in similar situations were applying to the Board to have their records corrected. While we note the actions the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicates were taken to inform eligible personnel of this new benefit, it appears that through no fault of the applicant he was not timely made aware of his eligibility for TEB and the steps necessary to transfer his benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01406
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-01406 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01408
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPALO recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. His officer performance report (OPR) for the period closing 4 Mar 12, which includes part of the timeframe in question, reflects his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01420
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01420 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to include his Vietnam service. We took careful notice of the applicants complete submission in support of his request and the evidence of record in judging the merits of the case...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01425
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01425 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed Family Servicemembers Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) premiums for the period covering 1 Oct 10 to 31 Mar 12, in the amount of $90.00. On 9 Mar 12, the applicant indicated on a SGLV 8286A, Family Coverage Election and Certificate, part...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01426
The second instructor was not informed of what the first instructor had observed. Through counsel, the applicant asserts that disenrollment was due to the USAFA assessing him a failing grade during the summer 2012 Math 142 (Calculus II) course after being accused of cheating on the final exam. The applicant received a personal hearing with the decision authority, who explained to him that the preponderance of the evidence was sufficiently compelling to find that he had cheated on the final exam.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01436
The pain started spontaneously without injury. On 6 Apr 10, an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) found the applicant unfit for duty due to his back injury, that his back injury was combat related due to his being involved in a the terrorist bombing, and recommended discharge with severance pay and a disability rating of ten percent. In the applicants case, his FPEB noted: The Board considered the current functionality and degree of impairment and concluded his back condition is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01439
His narrative reason for separation is Request for Discharge in Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial. He had 13 years, 6 months and 8 days of active service. The complete Medical Consultants evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The advisory opinions rely heavily on the fact of the absence of military and medical records in this case to recommend denial of the applicants requested...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01440
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01440 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for misconductdrug abuse be upgraded to Honorable. The reason for the Article 15 was the applicant did, on diverse occasions between 1 Apr 79 and 1 Apr 80, wrongfully use marijuana. In the interest...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01443
Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include his narrative reason for separation was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01452
AFBCMR BC-2013-01452 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01455
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01455 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be change to honorable {sic}. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01467
It was determined the applicants date of rank to senior airman was 16 July 2009, which, in itself, made him eligible for promotion consideration to staff sergeant for cycle 10E5. In this instance, the applicant requests retroactive promotion to E-6; however, he is not yet eligible for promotion consideration to E-6. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01469
Upon the final Board decision, administrative correction of his official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01471
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01471 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the United States Air Force Recruiting Ribbon. The Air Force Recruiter Ribbon is retroactive for any individual who has successfully completed 36 months of duty as an Air Force recruiter and is currently on active duty or a member of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01488
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial stating the upgrade training requirements for 3S371 include duty position tasks, core tasks, a minimum time requirement, and competition of craftsman course. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01495
On 22 May 85, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) reviewed the applicants request to upgrade his discharge, but denied the request because the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01497
As of this date, this office has not received a response. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01497 in Executive Session on 10 Dec 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Feb 2013, w/atch. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Apr 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01502
Members of the Board , , and considered this application on 15 January 2014. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, NGB/A1PS, dtd 13 Aug 13 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-01502 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01508
On 22 Dec 88, the applicant was discharged for Misconduct Drug Abuse with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions) in the grade of airman. On 14 Oct 93, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicants appeal for upgrade of her discharge to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01514
On 9 June 2009, his commander notified him that he was recommending him for discharge under the provisions of Air Force Policy Directive (AFPD) 36-32, Military Retirements and Separations and Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3208 Administrative Separation of Airmen, paragraph 5.26.3. for failure to progress in military training required to be qualified for service with the Air Force or for performance of primary duty. The AFDRB concluded that the discharge was consistent with the procedural...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01521
He was not informed by the DVA or the Air Force of the need to transfer the benefits. Had the applicant gone onto the Air Forces website to transfer benefits - he would have been approved and would have found out about the ADSC he would have incurred as a result of the transfer of benefits. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 May 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01529
After a thorough review of the applicant's official military personnel record, DPSID was able to verify award of the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA). Upon the final Board decision, administrative correction of his official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice regarding the applicants request for entitlement to the VSM and the Republic of Vietnam Service...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01539
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. While the deceased member was a POW from 31 Jan 45 to 29 Apr 45, the applicant did not submit documentation which verifies the deceased...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01541
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating the applicant did not provide adequate justification or documentation to substantiate approval of his request. Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, eligible for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01546
On 29 May 86, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) reviewed the applicants request to upgrade his discharge, but denied the request because the facts of record in his case did not warrant changing the type of discharge. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01547
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time he served with the Air Force, the AFCAM had not been established. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01556
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Air Force Reserves. At the time of retirement, the applicant had completed 9 satisfactory years of service. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility that since the applicant did not meet the requirements of the Post-9/11 GI Bill program at the time of his retirement, he is not eligible to transfer...