Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01228
Original file (BC-2013-01228.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-01228
		
			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His record be corrected to reflect his active duty service 
commitment (ADSC) date as of December 2009 when he originally 
submitted his Post-9/11 GI Bill transfer of educational benefits 
(TEB) request. 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He applied for the Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB in December 2009 while 
deployed to Afghanistan.  The message he received after 
submitting the online application indicated the transfer had 
been completed.  However, nearly three years later, he received 
an email informing him that an audit had detected that he needed 
to sign and send in a statement of understanding (SOU) for the 
Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB to be complete.  He did that, but the ADSC 
was based on the recent date he signed the SOU.  He requests the 
Board correct the ADSC so that it is based on the date the 
application was created in December 2009.  

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of an 
email message pertaining to his TEB, a 1 March 2013 letter of 
approval for the TEB, and recognition documents pertaining to 
his deployment.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of Colonel, O-6.  

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends approval.  DPSIT states during the period 
from 1 August 2009 to 1 July 2010, there was no “banner” in the 
virtual Military Personnel Flight (vMPF) which allowed members 
to verify their email and phone numbers prior to continuing.  It 
is possible with the applicant’s temporary duty (TDY) assignment 
and this lack of verification, that he did not receive 
notification.   

The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 22 March 2013, for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit D).  To date, a response has not been received.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.  

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice.  After a 
thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s 
complete submission, we are persuaded that relief is warranted.  
In this respect, we note the applicant has provided 
documentation substantiating he applied for the Transfer of 
Educational Benefits (TEB) for his dependents.  We also note the 
comments of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
indicating it is possible that with the applicant’s temporary 
duty (TDY) assignment and a lack of verification in the virtual 
Military Personnel Flight (vMPF), he did not receive 
notification.  In view of this and noting the applicant did take 
affirmative action to transfer his educational benefits, we find 
a sufficient basis to conclude that he has been the victim of an 
injustice and therefore, recommend the records be corrected as 
indicated below.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
	a.  On 4 December 2009, he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 
GI Bill Educational Benefits (TEB).

	b.  His three-year Active Duty Service Commitment be 
reflected as 4 December 2009 through 3 December 2012 rather than 
current ADSC.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 16 December 2013, under the provisions 
of AFI 36-2603:

			, Panel Chair
			, Member
			, Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-01228 was considered:  

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 9 March 2013, w/atch.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 15 March 2013.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 March 2013.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03064

    Original file (BC 2013 03064.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted the application to transfer the Post-9/11 GI Bill on 18 January 2011. The SOU was never received. The applicant was sent an email on 19 January 2011 requesting his signature on the SOU.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03062

    Original file (BC 2013 03062.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He submitted an application for the TEB on 13 March 2011 at which point he thought the application process was complete. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. Without the signing of an SOU there is no way the TFSC has any idea the applicant wants the obligated four year ADSC that goes along with the transfer of the benefit.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03973

    Original file (BC 2013 03973.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03973 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) for transfer of his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational benefits to his dependents be corrected to 9 Apr 2018 [sic]. Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05700

    Original file (BC 2013 05700.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05700 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits (TEB) to his dependents while on active duty. He was presented with a message on the MilConnect website indicating his transfer request would not be final until he digitally signs an Air Force Form 4460, Post 9/11 GI Bill...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01734

    Original file (BC-2012-01734.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He knew there was a four year ADSC with the transfer but was completely unaware there was a form to sign at the time of submission for approval. He was sent an email on 13 Jun 2011 requesting he sign and return the SOU. He has served 17 years of service in the United States Air Force and as an officer takes integrity very seriously.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02517

    Original file (BC 2013 02517.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He registered for the Post 9/11 GI Bill and Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) in Nov 2009 but unfortunately, was not aware he was required to sign a Statement of Understanding (SOU) concurring with the 4 year Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) required for TEB. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03459

    Original file (BC 2014 03459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The message states in part: "Within 72 hours you will receive an Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) email with "TEB INCIDENT" in the subject line, stating that your AF Form 4406 is ready for signature. The date on the SOU provided by the applicant reads “9/6/2011”. The applicant did not complete the TEB SOU and therefore his 20 May 11 TEB application could not be approved.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04681

    Original file (BC 2013 04681.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04681 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His active duty service commitment (ADSC) extension from the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) begin January 10, the month he originally transferred his educational benefits to his family. STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to the applicant’s military personnel records he was serving on active...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03316

    Original file (BC 2013 03316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the time, there was no indication of any other required steps to complete. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 10 Jul 2009, he signed a Statement of Understanding to start his four year Active Duty Service Commitment for transfer of his Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to his dependents. Exhibit C. Letter,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03131

    Original file (BC 2014 03131.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no record the member signed his SOU on 18 Feb 10. DPSIT recommends the member’s date of TEB application be changed to 18 Feb 10 and the ADSC date be adjusted to 17 Feb 11, due to the fact that he did not receive emails instructing him to sign the SOU. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03131 in Executive Session on 11 May 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member All members voted to correct the records as recommended.