RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01488
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, be corrected to reflect her Air Force Specialty Code
(AFSC) as 3S371 rather than 3S351.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She successfully completed the Manpower Craftsman Course and all
upgrade training in October 2005.
In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of her
DD Form 214 and a copy of her AF IMT 910, Enlisted Performance
Report (AB thru TSGT).
Her complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant retired from the Regular Air Force on 31 Mar 06
after serving 20 years and 5 days on active duty.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
_
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial stating the upgrade training
requirements for 3S371 include duty position tasks, core tasks,
a minimum time requirement, and competition of craftsman course.
The member met minimum time requirements; however, a
determination cannot be made without the training records and
proof of recommendation by the supervisor (completion of AF Form
2096, Classificaiton/On-the-Job Training Action). The applicant
may submit additional documentation for reconsideration, if
available.
The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 5 Aug 13 for review and comment within 30 days. As
of this date, this office has received no response.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. However, should
the applicant posses the documentation cited by AFPC/DPSIT, the
applicant may apply for reconsideration. In the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-01488 in Executive Session on 14 Nov 13, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2013-01488 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Mar 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 17 Jul 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Aug 13.
ANTHONY P. REARDON
Panel Chair
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
4
2
This document contains information which must be protected IAW AFI 33-332 and DoD Regulation
5400.11; Privacy Act of 1974 as Amended Applies, and it is For Official Use Only (FOUO).
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05307
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05307 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect that he was awarded a 7-skill level in Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 2A5X1 (Aircraft Maintenance). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest level of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03959
According to an SAF/MRBR Action Request, dated 31 Jul 14, the applicants DD Form 214, Block 15b, Commissioned through ROTC Scholarship, will be administratively corrected to reflect Yes. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPSIT recommends denial of the applicants request to add the Space and Missile Intelligence Formal Training course to her DD Form 214. The Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) for the DD Form 214, using the regulatory guidance for the DD Form 214 content at the time of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-04574
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00137
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01377 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to show she transferred her Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits to her daughter while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01119
On 19 Aug 2013, the applicant was again requested to sign the addendum and no response was received within the allotted time. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03096
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03096 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be updated with the following: Removal of Mid-East Crypto Linguist Craftsman Arabic (advanced) course (3ME), dated Jan 1993; (Administratively corrected) Award of Joint Meritorious Unit Award (JMUA) with two Bronze Oak Leaf Clusters (w/2BOLC);...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-04574
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04057
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibilities (OPRs) which are included at Exhibits C, D, E and F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAF/A3O-AIF recommends denial of the applicants request for the award of the Aeronautical Badge because she did not have at least 36 months of operational flying to be permanently awarded the Aircrew Member Badge. In accordance with Air Force Instruction 36-3203,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05445
Since the applicant served on active duty since 11 Sep 01, he was entitled to Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits in his own right and was otherwise eligible to transfer said benefits to his dependents, provided he met the prescribed active duty service commitment (ADSC) of four years. Had the applicant successfully transferred his benefits on the date requested (3 Apr 10), he would have incurred a four-year ADSC requiring him to serve until at least 2 Apr 14. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02984
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02984 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 3A (First-term airman who separates before completing 36 months on current enlistment and who has no known disqualifying factors or ineligibility conditions except grade, skill level, and insufficient Total Active...